Author Topic: Climate Model Bias 3: Solar Input  (Read 237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 176,780
Climate Model Bias 3: Solar Input
« on: March 04, 2024, 10:29:49 am »
Climate Model Bias 3: Solar Input
17 hours ago Andy May 106 Comments

By Andy May

In part 2 we discussed the IPCC hypothesis of climate change that assumes humans and our greenhouse gas emissions and land use choices are the climate change “control knob.”[1] This hypothesis underpins their attempts to model Earth’s climate. But the model output fails to match many critical observations and in some cases the model/observation mismatches are getting worse with time.[2] Since these mismatches have persisted through six major iterations of the models, it is reasonable to assume the flaw is in the assumptions, that is within the hypothesis itself, as opposed to being in the model construction. In other words, it is likely the IPCC conceptual model should be scrapped, and a new one using different assumptions constructed. In this post we examine their underlying assumption that the Sun has not varied significantly, at least from a climate perspective, over the past 150-170 years.

As well-explained by Bob Irvine,[3] there are only two things that contribute to the thermal energy content of a planet, the amount of incoming energy and the energy residence time within the system. These two things, along with the climate system heat capacity, determine the surface temperature. Arrhenius assumed and the IPCC still assumes the Sun delivers a nearly constant amount of energy to Earth over periods of a few hundred years, constant enough that it has no impact on our climate. In addition, they work with annual averages to avoid seasonal and orbital changes. In AR6, the base period is 1750 to 2019. The IPCC assumes the Sun is invariant, at least on an annual basis, over this period and volcanic activity is just slightly negative, as shown in figure 2.[4] AR6 summarizes their views as follows:

“Changes in solar and volcanic activity are assessed to have together contributed a small change of –0.02 [–0.06 to +0.02] °C since 1750 (medium confidence).”

AR6 p. 962.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/03/03/climate-model-bias-3-solar-input/
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth.  George Washington - Farewell Address

Online DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,224
  • Gender: Male
Re: Climate Model Bias 3: Solar Input
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2024, 10:49:51 am »
Science nerds, what about the "Year Without A Summer" in 1816 after the eruption of Mount Tambora in 1815?

Also, what about 536 A.D., the worst year to be alive?
https://www.science.org/content/article/why-536-was-worst-year-be-alive

So, ancient societies were wrong to worship the sun and offer sacrifices to volcanoes?

Me thinks they are selecting statistical averages of averages to fit their hypothesis than acutally basing science on the data, not statistical manipulation of the data.


"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview