Connecticut socialite mom admits to secretly filming minors in her mansion

[Kamaji]

Connecticut socialite mom admits to secretly filming minors in her mansion

By Patrick Reilly
February 14, 2022

A voyeuristic Connecticut socialite pleaded guilty to secretly recording three people, including a child, in a sexual situation in her multi-million dollar Greenwich mansion.

Hadley Palmer, a mother of four, pleaded guilty to three counts of voyeurism and risk of injury to a minor– all committed in 2017 – on Jan. 19 in state superior court. As part of the plea bargain, the two most serious charges levied against her were dropped – employing a minor in an obscene performance, which is a Class A felony, and possession of child pornography.

The charges allege she filmed someone either naked or in their underwear with the “intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desire of such person (defendant) or any other person.”

Palmer, 53, could face between 90 days and 60 months in prison. She will also be required to register as a sex offender.

However, in an unusual move, her criminal case has been sealed from the public. Judge John Blawie ordered in Stamford on Thursday, limiting most of the details and criminal proceedings surrounding her crimes.

*  *  *

Source:  https://nypost.com/2022/02/14/connecticut-socialite-mom-admits-to-secretly-filming-minors-for-sexual-pleasure/

[Kamaji]

Money talks:  one wonders how much it cost her to get the case sealed.

[mountaineer]

However, in an unusual move, her criminal case has been sealed from the public. Judge John Blawie ordered in Stamford on Thursday, limiting most of the details and criminal proceedings surrounding her crimes.

That's BS.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Palmer, 53, could face between 90 days and 60 months in prison. She will also be required to register as a sex offender.

However, in an unusual move, her criminal case has been sealed from the public. Judge John Blawie ordered in Stamford on Thursday, limiting most of the details and criminal proceedings surrounding her crimes.

Doesn't this court order beome moot once she registers?

[Kamaji]

Doesn't this court order beome moot once she registers?

Not according to the article.  Also, what she wants sealed are the salacious details, not merely the fact of her conviction and requirement to register.