Ten Reasons Vindman’s Testimony Was Bad for Democrats

[Fishrrman]

https://pjmedia.com/trending/ten-reasons-vindmans-testimony-was-bad-for-democrats/

Ten Reasons Vindman’s Testimony Was Bad for Democrats
BY MATT MARGOLIS
NOVEMBER 19, 2019

Forget the Democrats' talking points. Forget the media spin. If you watched Lt. Col. Vindman's testimony today it was a total dud for the Democrats and their impeachment witch hunt. Need proof? I've compiled ten reasons that the show today did not advance the Democrats' narrative one bit.

10. Vindman admitted that the president, not unelected bureaucrats, sets U.S. policy
9. Vindman admitted he never had contact with President Trump
8. Vindman admitted having no firsthand knowledge of aid or an investigation and was just “following news accounts”
7. Vindman admitted Trump was “well within his rights” to ask Ukraine for help in an investigation
6. Vindman admitted that putting the transcript of the Ukraine call on a secure server was “definitely not unprecedented”
5. Vindman admitted the Trump-Zelenksy transcript was “very accurate”
4. Vindman admitted he has never used the term “bribery” to describe the president’s actions
3. Vindman said he couldn’t recall Ukrainians feeling pressured to do investigations
2. Vindman said, "As far as I can tell," Hunter Biden was not qualified to serve on Burisma’s board
1. Vindman said there was an appearance of a conflict of interest with Hunter Biden being on the Burisma board

More at URL above...

[PeteS in CA]

For some reason, I doubt any Dem elicited these admissions from Vindman.

[LegalAmerican]

https://pjmedia.com/trending/ten-reasons-vindmans-testimony-was-bad-for-democrats/

Ten Reasons Vindman’s Testimony Was Bad for Democrats
BY MATT MARGOLIS
NOVEMBER 19, 2019

Forget the Democrats' talking points. Forget the media spin. If you watched Lt. Col. Vindman's testimony today it was a total dud for the Democrats and their impeachment witch hunt. Need proof? I've compiled ten reasons that the show today did not advance the Democrats' narrative one bit.

10. Vindman admitted that the president, not unelected bureaucrats, sets U.S. policy
9. Vindman admitted he never had contact with President Trump
8. Vindman admitted having no firsthand knowledge of aid or an investigation and was just “following news accounts”
7. Vindman admitted Trump was “well within his rights” to ask Ukraine for help in an investigation
6. Vindman admitted that putting the transcript of the Ukraine call on a secure server was “definitely not unprecedented”
5. Vindman admitted the Trump-Zelenksy transcript was “very accurate”
4. Vindman admitted he has never used the term “bribery” to describe the president’s actions
3. Vindman said he couldn’t recall Ukrainians feeling pressured to do investigations
2. Vindman said, "As far as I can tell," Hunter Biden was not qualified to serve on Burisma’s board
1. Vindman said there was an appearance of a conflict of interest with Hunter Biden being on the Burisma board

More at URL above...

 


Why does NO ONE talks about the  1998 TREATY WITH UKRAINE...where either president, can check on corruption..first?  Making sure our humanitarian aid does not go into CORRUPT HANDS?  OUR TAX DOLLARS?  IT DID!

Pelosi son, Kerry son, Romney son & BIDEN'S SON!  Money laundering & everybody gets a cut. This is what demon-rats are afraid of, Being found out!  WHY, they want to 'impeach' an innocent man.