What I referred to above:
Personally, I think the Boise decision is fundamentally flawed. It should not be a city's responsibility - ultimately, taxpayers' - to provide free housing to bums just because the bums choose to infest the city.
1. Cities are trying to comply, by getting suitable housing. Property owners nearby are blocking the sites, along NIMBY lines.
2. The subject homeless, are considered "disabled," by the criteria of GHW Bush's "landmark ADA rules.
I have followed this topic, and you would be surprised how many of OUR neighbors are sympathetic.
GHW Bush was the fellow behind "Compassionate Conservatism," if you remember.
Involuntary commitment & confinement, is one obvious answer, which recalls a time when adults were still running the asylum.
Or, Make America Great AGAIN.