Christine Blasey Ford’s High School Yearbook Scrubbed to Hide Environment of Racism, Binge Drinking

[SirLinksALot]

SOURCE: GATEWAY PUNDIT

URL: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/christine-blasey-fords-high-school-yearbook-was-scrubbed-to-hide-environment-of-racism-binge-drinking-by-minors-and-elitism/

by Jim Hoft


The Holton girls school promoted binge drinking and promiscuity.

The yearbook clearly portrays the young girls as the sexual predators of younger men.

The Cult of the First Amendment posted an extensive analysis of Christine Blasey’s elitist high school where faculty promoted an environment of binge drinking, promiscuity and elitism.

The yearbook was recently scrubbed after Christine Blasey Ford made headlines over her allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

On Monday Sept. 17th, Christine Blasey Ford’s high school yearbooks suddenly disappeared from the web. I read them days before, knew they would be scrubbed, and saved them. Why did I know they would be scrubbed? Because if roles were reversed, and Christine Blasey Ford had been nominated for the Supreme Court by President Trump, the headline by the resistance would be this:

CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD AND THE DRUNKEN WHITE PRIVILEGED RACIST PLAYGIRLS OF HOLTON-ARMS.

And it would be an accurate headline. That’s why the yearbooks have been scrubbed. They are a testament to the incredible power these girls had over their teachers, parents and the boys of Georgetown Prep, Landon and other schools in the area. In the pages below, you will see multiple photos and references to binge drinking and the accompanying joy of not being able to remember any of it.

These yearbooks are, therefore, relevant to the national investigation now being conducted in the media, in homes, and in the halls of Congress. And they should not have been scrubbed. If Brett Kavanaugh’s yearbooks are fair game, so are these.

And you will wonder while reading them, why the hell did the faculty approve of these yearbooks? Why did the parents take out paid ads in these yearbooks? Animal House had nothing on the infamous “Holton party scene”.

(EXCERPT) CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE REST...

[SirLinksALot]

For those interested, read more here:


https://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html?m=1

TITLE: WHY CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOKS WERE SCRUBBED: Faculty Approved Racism, Binge Drinking and Promiscuity

[kevindavis007]

Sorry, I need to see this elsewhere besides the Gateway Pundit.

[Frank Cannon]

Sorry, I need to see this elsewhere besides the Gateway Pundit.

American Thinker has articles on this too. This is going viral.

[SirLinksALot]

[SirLinksALot]

Sorry, I need to see this elsewhere besides the Gateway Pundit.

Elsewhere as in where? The New York Times or the Washington Post or MSNBC?

Why can't the article stand on its own especially when it is SOURCED from the yearbook itself?

[SirLinksALot]

[SirLinksALot]

Sorry, I need to see this elsewhere besides the Gateway Pundit.

Will this other article help?

Fast times at Holton-Arms High when Christine Blasey Ford was a student there


by Thomas Lifeson

Since high school keg parties at the elite prep schools attended by Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey are now a matter of consuming interest to the Democrat-media complex, it is perhaps telling that the high school yearbooks of Holton-Arms, the school attended by Blasey, have been scrubbed from the web. The blog Cult of the First Amendment says:

Those who are interested can examine the many pages that are claimed to come from the yearbooks and make their own judgments. I am not familiar with the blog or blogger, but the veracity of the pages is certainly subject to investigation and verification.

(Excerpt) Read more at this link: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/fast_times_at_holton_arms_high_when_christine_blasey_ford_was_a_student_there_.html...

[austingirl]

No wonder the accuser wants to limit what she can be asked. She also wants witnesses to be heard- who would that be since she says she never spoke of the incident (if there was one) until 2012.

[Applewood]

Sorry, I need to see this elsewhere besides the Gateway Pundit.

A number of stories going around about Ms. Ford have been found to be misleading or flat out lies. 

Yes, this is the New York Times, but read how many legitimate sources spread these stories around with fact checking.  Gateway Pundit was one of those outlets.  One should always be skeptical if a story originates on Twitter or any other social media.  Looks like several major news outlets failed to fact check.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/19/us/politics/christine-blasey-ford-kavanaughs-fact-check.html

[Wingnut]

A number of stories going around about Ms. Ford have been found to be misleading or flat out lies. 

Yes, this is the New York Times, but read how many legitimate sources spread these stories around with fact checking.  Gateway Pundit was one of those outlets.  One should always be skeptical if a story originates on Twitter or any other social media.  Looks like several major news outlets failed to fact check.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/19/us/politics/christine-blasey-ford-kavanaughs-fact-check.html

So the reported facts that she was a teenage alcoholic and a promiscuous cum guzzler were not true?  However will she get her reputation back?

[SirLinksALot]

A number of stories going around about Ms. Ford have been found to be misleading or flat out lies. 

Yes, this is the New York Times, but read how many legitimate sources spread these stories around with fact checking.  Gateway Pundit was one of those outlets.  One should always be skeptical if a story originates on Twitter or any other social media.  Looks like several major news outlets failed to fact check.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/19/us/politics/christine-blasey-ford-kavanaughs-fact-check.html

If anyone bothers to read the article, it basically says claims 2, 4 and 5 are true but don’t matter, but don't they?

Let's look at what the NY Times wrote:

* “Yes, Kavanaugh’s mother did rule on a foreclosure against her parents, but the ruling gave the parents enough breathing room actually helped then avoid foreclosure in the end”

Like liberals are going to have an ounce of gratitude?

* “Yes, Blasey is a democratic donor with a long history of activism but she doesn’t have enough money to be a MAJOR donor.”

Therefore, what follows?  she must be completely objective, with no political motivations?

In other words, to the Times, she is not a MAJOR donor like Soros, and that claim is true.  So, because of that,  we should ignore the fact that she has donated to democrats, and she has participated in left wing, anti-Trump activities, such as marches?

* “Yes, Blasey’s brother works for the law firm that hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the DNC, but her brother isn’t personally linked to the fajw Russia scandal yet.”

One cannot help but ask --- It’s just a coincidence that the people involved in these things always have ties back to the same small circle of people in a nation of 320 million people.

Even claim number 3, that she has made these same claims about others is not false, just not definitely proved yet.

Only the claim about her negative Rate-My-Professor reviews seems to be a case of mistaken identity.