I would think so.
Expanded Panama Canal reduces travel time for shipments of U.S. LNG to Asian markets
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=26892
JUNE 30, 2016

The newly expanded Panama Canal will be able to accommodate 90% of the world's current liquefied natural gas (LNG) tankers with LNG-carrying capacity up to 3.9 billion cubic feet (Bcf). Prior to the expansion, only 30 of the smallest LNG tankers (6% of the current global fleet) with capacities up to 0.7 Bcf could transit the canal. The expansion has significant implications for LNG trade, reducing travel time and transportation costs for LNG shipments from the U.S. Gulf Coast to key markets in Asia and providing additional access to previously regionalized LNG markets....
Wow. Unbelievable this is more economic to get from USA rather than Qatar or Western Australia to Pakistan.
Am suspecting this is not much of technical reasons related to economics such as capital + opex but simply the onerous royalties demanded by the host governments sending the gas.
If so, they are really screwing themselves, as the USA has a hellavu lot of LNG growth ahead of it, and we will be the winners and they will be the losers.