Author Topic: U-2 Versus Global Hawk: Why Drones Aren't Always The Best Solution For Warfighters  (Read 588 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
U-2 Versus Global Hawk: Why Drones Aren't Always The Best Solution For Warfighters

Loren Thompson , Contributor


Unmanned aircraft ("drones") have captured the popular imagination. Hardly a day goes by without a story appearing somewhere about how unmanned aircraft will revolutionize everything from commercial logistics to air combat.

It's a seductive idea, and probably true to some extent. In the unforgiving world of military planners, though, what matters most is how the available options for conducting missions perform today, not what might unfold tomorrow. One such mission is intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance -- what the military calls ISR. Detailed, timely information about tactical conditions is indispensable in deterring or defeating enemies, so much of contemporary military debate revolves around how best to collect, analyze and share such information.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2018/02/05/u-2-versus-global-hawk-why-drones-arent-always-the-best-solution-for-warfighters/#4aaeac344d7e
« Last Edit: February 06, 2018, 10:35:19 am by rangerrebew »