I thought this part of the article was odd:
"Looking ahead to the midterms, it doesn’t look like Nunes’s new notoriety will cost him electorally back home in Central California’s heavily Republican 22nd district. Nunes’s main challenger in this November’s election, Democratic prosecutor Andrew Janz, reportedly raised more than $110,000 on Thursday and Friday thanks to the memo controversy. But Politico reported on Saturday that while Janz’s campaign may be energized and trying to capitalize on Nunes’s bad press, the candidate still faces long odds. Nunes already has a $3.8 million campaign war chest, and, unlike many other California Republicans, his seat is not being aggressively targeted by ambitious Democrats this fall.
"The New York Times checked in with random voters in Nunes’s district on Friday and found that people either weren’t aware of the memo controversy or didn’t much care about it. Then again, as Ed Kilgore argued on Thursday, an upset this fall isn’t out of the question, and “no matter how this all turns out, Nunes is attracting an astonishing amount of attention to himself, and is out on a political limb that looks less stable every day.â€
California...