Author Topic: Just How Badly Do Psychologists Misunderstand Conservatives?  (Read 357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Just How Badly Do Psychologists Misunderstand Conservatives?
« on: April 12, 2017, 06:13:06 am »
Jonathan Haidt is a social psychologist who has been in the, news sharing his erroneous theory of morality in a mistitled book, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion.  Dr. Haidt bases his theory of morality on the atheist assumption that evolution is a non-purposive mechanism, driven by random mutations selected for survival functionality.  From that spiritual void, Dr. Haidt tells us morality is an artifact of evolutionary sociobiology.  "Evolution shaped human brains[, resulting in] evolved psychological mechanisms that work together to suppress selfishness and make social life possible."

Social life is the universal human condition, with or without morality.  Two murderers in a cell are a social group, yet if one doesn't slit the other's throat, it is not necessarily because of morality.  But in Professor Haidt's functionalist understanding, any suppression of selfishness in a group is an example of morality.  In this godless model, a terrorist who suppresses a wish to kill his sex slave and instead lets another terrorist rape her is displaying morality.  In truth, morality operates to suppress selfishness not merely for social order, but for the possibility of divinely inspired existence.

More: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/04/just_how_badly_do_psychologists_misunderstand_conservatives.html

American Thinker, once more proving that Truth in Advertising doesn't apply to magazine names.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink