Author Topic: As Trump Unmuzzles the American Economy, Rosy Scenario Will Become Economic Reality  (Read 1141 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SirLinksALot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,417
  • Gender: Male
SOURCE: NATIONAL REVIEW

URL: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/445192/business-tax-cuts-make-4-percent-growth-realistic

by Larry Kudlow



Virtually the whole world is beating up on the Trump administration for daring to predict that low marginal tax rates, regulatory rollbacks, and the repeal of Obamacare will generate 3 to 3.5 percent economic growth in the years ahead.

In a CNBC interview last week, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin held the line on this forecast. He also argued the need for dynamic budget scoring to capture the effects of faster growth. Good for him.

But what’s so interesting about all the economic-growth naysaying today is that President Obama’s first budget forecast roughly eight years ago was much rosier than Trump’s. And there was nary a peep of criticism from the mainstream-media outlets and the consensus of economists.

Strategas Research Partners policy analyst Dan Clifton printed up a chart of the Obama plan that predicted real economic growth of roughly 3 percent in 2010, near 4 percent in 2011, over 4 percent in 2012, and nearly 4 percent in 2013.

But it turned out that actual growth ran below 2 percent during this period. Was there any howling about this result among the economic consensus? Of course not. It seems they’ve saved all their grumbling for the Trump forecast today.

And what’s really interesting is that the Obama policy didn’t include a single economic-growth incentive. Not one. Instead, there was a massive $850 billion so-called spending stimulus (Whatever became of those spending multipliers?), a bunch of public-works programs that never got off the ground, and finally Obamacare, which really was one giant tax increase.

Remember when Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts ruled that the health-care mandate was in fact a tax? But it wasn’t just a tax. It was a tax hike. And added to that were an 3.8 percent investment tax hike, a proposed tax hike on so-called Cadillac insurance plans, and yet another tax increase on medical equipment.

So eight years ago tax-and-spend was perfectly okay. And the projection that it would produce a 4 percent growth rate perfectly satisfied the economic consensus.

Make sense? No, it does not.

So here’s President Trump reaching back through history for a common-sense growth policy that worked in the 1960s, when JFK slashed marginal tax rates on individuals and corporations, and again in the 1980s, when Ronald Reagan slashed tax rates across-the-board and sparked a two-decade boom of roughly 4 percent real annual growth.

But the economic consensus won’t buy Trump’s plan.

One after another, Trump critics argue that because we’ve had 2 percent growth over the past ten years or so, we are doomed to continue that forever. This is nonsense.

Most of the Trump critics point to the decline in productivity over the past 15 years. They say, unless productivity jumps to 2.5 percent or so, and unless labor-force participation rises, we can’t possibly have 3 to 4 percent growth.

So I invite your attention to the below chart from Stanford University economics professor John Taylor, who’s also a research fellow at the Hoover Institution. Taylor, one of the nation’s top academic economists, shows that productivity declines can be followed by productivity increases, which unfortunately can be followed again by productivity declines. Look at the chart:



In his widely read blog, Economics One, Taylor writes, “Take off the muzzle and the economy will roar.” He notes that bad economic policy leads to slumping productivity, living standards, real wages, and growth.

“Huge swings in productivity growth in recent years,” Taylor writes, “are closely related to shifts in economic policy, and economic theory indicates that the relationship is causal.”

He concludes, “To turn the economy around we need to take the muzzle off, and that means regulatory reform, tax reform, budget reform, and monetary reform.”

Well, aren’t those exactly the reforms that President Trump is promoting?

Get rid of the state-sponsored barriers to growth. Then watch how these common-sense incentive-minded policies turn rosy scenario into economic reality.

– Larry Kudlow is CNBC’s senior contributor. His new book is JFK and the Reagan Revolution: A Secret History of American Prosperity, written with Brian Domitrovic.

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,322
  • Gender: Male
If we finally get our first year of 3% or greater growth under Trump, it will be interesting to see how the Obamaites and media spin it
I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,386
  • Gender: Male
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
If we finally get our first year of 3% or greater growth under Trump, it will be interesting to see how the Obamaites and media spin it
It will be even more interesting, how the #nevertrumps spin it. Watch for it here.

"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline the_doc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,171
All of the pro-Trump economists overlook disaster scenarios that would be completely beyond Trump's control--for example an international banking collapse, race riots, and, perhaps worst of all, massive jihadist attacks on American soil. 

I honestly do wish our POTUS well--and I generally applaud what he is doing--but the folks who trust Trump so confidently need to read The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn.  We are by no means out of the woods of our spiritual arrogance as a nation--the same arrogance that got Republicans to nominate Trump over a better man.   

Offline montanajoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,324
If we finally get our first year of 3% or greater growth under Trump, it will be interesting to see how the Obamaites and media spin it

What will be interesting is how much government spending will be necessary to get that 3% and how the formally "fiscally" conservative GOP will spin it..and pay for it.. :shrug:

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,322
  • Gender: Male
What will be interesting is how much government spending will be necessary to get that 3% and how the formally "fiscally" conservative GOP will spin it..and pay for it.. :shrug:

@montanajoe

Agreed. We will have to see. Here's to hoping that doesn't become the case.

But in the chance we do see real, sustained economic growth under his watch, the Democrats are going to have a tough time explaining it away
« Last Edit: February 28, 2017, 07:38:18 pm by LMAO »
I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

Offline LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,322
  • Gender: Male
All of the pro-Trump economists overlook disaster scenarios that would be completely beyond Trump's control--for example an international banking collapse, race riots, and, perhaps worst of all, massive jihadist attacks on American soil. 

I honestly do wish our POTUS well--and I generally applaud what he is doing--but the folks who trust Trump so confidently need to read The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn.  We are by no means out of the woods of our spiritual arrogance as a nation--the same arrogance that got Republicans to nominate Trump over a better man.

Not to mention things like our debt and deficits continuing to rise along with unsustainable entitlement programs
I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them.

Barry Goldwater

http://www.usdebtclock.org

My Avatar is my adult autistic son Tommy

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
All of the pro-Trump economists overlook disaster scenarios that would be completely beyond Trump's control--for example an international banking collapse, race riots, and, perhaps worst of all, massive jihadist attacks on American soil. 

I honestly do wish our POTUS well--and I generally applaud what he is doing--but the folks who trust Trump so confidently need to read The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn.  We are by no means out of the woods of our spiritual arrogance as a nation--the same arrogance that got Republicans to nominate Trump over a better man.

And let's not forget.... the ability of the Feds to up interest rates (after almost a decade of propping up the Obama administration) to the point that the economy collapses under (gasp!).... yet another Republican.   If they can do it, they will do it.  Bank on it.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline r9etb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,467
  • Gender: Male
What bothers me about this article (which is remarkably information-free, btw) is Kudlow's premise, which seems to be that "unmuzzling the American economy" is Trump's to do or not do. 

But it's really only his to sign or veto; and to make a cogent case  to the American public for why Congress ought to pass such legislation.

Unfortunately, the likelihood of Trump making a cogent case for anything has yet to be demonstrated.

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,253
So is Trump not going to go ahead with the economic nationalism thing?


Cause Bannon was all about that stuff in CPAC.

Wingnut

  • Guest
If we finally get our first year of 3% or greater growth under Trump, it will be interesting to see how the Obamaites and media spin it

See The Little Trollish Fellows anwser below for a hint.

So is Trump not going to go ahead with the economic nationalism thing?


Cause Bannon was all about that stuff in CPAC.

geronl

  • Guest
Not to mention things like our debt and deficits continuing to rise along with unsustainable entitlement programs

trillions in new "stimulus" won't help