In Trump's world, law and order means to hell with the Constitution
So why don't we try practical examples?
Trump makes note of weak interior immigration enforcement, and sanctuary cities. The woman murdered in San Francisco, by an illegal immigrant, roaming freely.
Which part of the Constitution would he be violating, in dealing more seriously with borders, criminals, etc.?
Likewise what part of the Constitution would he be violating, in getting more serious about admitting muslim "refugees?"
Can you show the Constitutional violations he is proposing to make?
Does the Constitution force us to allow the illegal immigrant murderer back into our country, or the cities to give them free reign? Or force us to allow more, and more young muslim men to enter?
Nixon and Reagan ran very much on Law and order themes.
Between Nixon, Reagan and Trump stating they intended to protect and serve decent citizens with law and order, or Hillary with her stated intention of scolding whites, and curtailing the 2nd Amendment, you come down with Clinton?