Author Topic: How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11  (Read 462 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 384,785
  • Let's Go Brandon!
How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11
« on: April 18, 2016, 01:46:35 pm »
http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/how-us-covered-up-saudi-role-in-911/



News
How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11

By Paul Sperry

April 17, 2016 | 6:00am

In its report on the still-censored “28 pages” implicating the Saudi government in 9/11, “60 Minutes” last weekend said the Saudi role in the attacks has been “soft-pedaled” to protect America’s delicate alliance with the oil-rich kingdom.

That’s quite an understatement.

Actually, the kingdom’s involvement was deliberately covered up at the highest levels of our government. And the coverup goes beyond locking up 28 pages of the Saudi report in a vault in the US Capitol basement. Investigations were throttled. Co-conspirators were let off the hook.

Case agents I’ve interviewed at the Joint Terrorism Task Forces in Washington and San Diego, the forward operating base for some of the Saudi hijackers, as well as detectives at the Fairfax County (Va.) Police Department who also investigated several 9/11 leads, say virtually every road led back to the Saudi Embassy in Washington, as well as the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles.

Yet time and time again, they were called off from pursuing leads. A common excuse was “diplomatic immunity.”

Those sources say the pages missing from the 9/11 congressional inquiry report — which comprise the entire final chapter dealing with “foreign support for the September 11 hijackers” — details “incontrovertible evidence” gathered from both CIA and FBI case files of official Saudi assistance for at least two of the Saudi hijackers who settled in San Diego.

Some information has leaked from the redacted section, including a flurry of pre-9/11 phone calls between one of the hijackers’ Saudi handlers in San Diego and the Saudi Embassy, and the transfer of some $130,000 from then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar’s family checking account to yet another of the hijackers’ Saudi handlers in San Diego.

continued
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Re: How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2016, 03:27:15 pm »
I've thought we shouldn't have had anything to do with Saudi Arabia since the first Gulf War, though, I'm not saying we should not have acted in 1990.

 It's unfortunate when errors made can be traced down to the side one is on.

Offline WAC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,904
Re: How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2016, 01:29:24 am »
As we know the size alone of the Saudi family is huge and there are throughout that vast array of meebrs many in conflict with their own

families regarding the associations with our government. It would not be at all surprising they would be involved with supporting

and assisting in the 9/11 attacks.  Also considering that the Saudi family itself is having difficulty holding onto power in their country.. they

sure don't want any more flack from the US creating issues they certainly don't want to contend with. Add in Yemen and Iran and Syria 

conflicts...along with the drop in oil prices for so long.....these guys are squirming no doubt.

Offline ArneFufkin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,579
Re: How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2016, 02:32:21 am »
My memory is hazy but I think it was ALWAYS known that low level members of the Saudi Royal Family were involved in funding the terrorists.

The bin-Laden family was intimately connected to the Royals and they ran the construction "racket" in SA and a lot of the Emirates during their ridiculous building spree in the 70s-90s.

But, the House of Saud entails over 15,000 people and nothing I've ever read or seen indicates the King or any senior leaders and their associates were involved in any way.

This is just more crap to fuel silly, dangerous and counter-productive isolationism.