The Briefing Room

General Category => National/Breaking News => Topic started by: rangerrebew on July 31, 2014, 01:38:16 pm

Title: Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
Post by: rangerrebew on July 31, 2014, 01:38:16 pm
Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
 
By Valerie Richardson
 
The Washington Times

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

 

DENVER — The Climate Reality Project brought its “I’m Too Hot” trucks and offers of free ice cream to this week’s Environmental Protection Agency hearings on power-plant emissions, but the climate wasn’t cooperating.

The plan was to tout the EPA’s emissions proposal as a solution for hot weather brought on by global warming, but when the hearings began at 9 a.m. Wednesday in Denver, the temperature was a chilly 58 degrees. Plus, it was raining.
 
The other cities hosting the hearings Wednesday were also hit by cooler-than-usual temperatures. The high in Atlanta was forecast at 82 degrees, while it was a pleasant 70 degrees in Washington, D.C., when the hearings began at 9 a.m.

The Climate Reality Project, founded by former Vice President Al Gore, launched its “I’m Too Hot” campaign last week as “a rallying point for action in the face of rising temperatures driven by climate disruption,” according to the press release.

“These EPA hearings are a crucial opportunity for people to let the EPA know they support the agency’s efforts to reduce harmful carbon pollution, and we’ll be there to make sure our supporters don’t get too hot,” said project president and CEO Ken Berlin in a statement.

There was no danger of that in Denver, where the locals were more interested in procuring umbrellas than ice cream.

Pittsburgh will host the last of the two-day hearings on the proposed regulations starting Thursday.

 
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/30/al-gores-climate-changers-epa-hearings-foiled-cool/#ixzz393LYDbhI
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Title: Re: Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
Post by: Relic on July 31, 2014, 01:47:58 pm
True leftists are undeterred by obvious failures in logic or theory. Leftists are so convinced of their superiority that they can't possibly conceive they are wrong on any substantial point. This is why, in spite of the numerous, and at times horrific failures of socialism, the left sees socialism as the solution to the human condition.

Man caused global warming is fact to the left. No debate, they will not hear anything that doesn't agree with their view. It could snow in July in Ecuador and the alarmists would say it's just weather not climate, global warming is fact, end of story.
Title: Re: Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
Post by: musiclady on July 31, 2014, 02:06:03 pm
The strategy of changing the term 'Global Warming' to 'Climate Change' allowed these religious zealots to support any aberrant weather to man-made-global-warming.

In a way, it was brilliant, because, as transparent as it was, it allowed the dupes of the world to say, "Oh, yeah.......it's really cold because of global warming."

Who would have thought people would ever be so utterly stupid to fall for this leftist crap?
Title: Re: Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
Post by: GourmetDan on July 31, 2014, 02:26:27 pm
True leftists are undeterred by obvious failures in logic or theory. Leftists are so convinced of their superiority that they can't possibly conceive they are wrong on any substantial point. This is why, in spite of the numerous, and at times horrific failures of socialism, the left sees socialism as the solution to the human condition.

Man caused global warming is fact to the left. No debate, they will not hear anything that doesn't agree with their view. It could snow in July in Ecuador and the alarmists would say it's just weather not climate, global warming is fact, end of story.

I have debated a few and they actually insist that cooler temperatures are caused by global warming.

As you said, it is impossible to reason with logic like that...