The Briefing Room
State Chapters => Arizona => Topic started by: Elderberry on November 19, 2022, 02:10:55 pm
-
WND By Randy DeSoto, The Western Journal 11/18/2022
Video footage of a drop box location in Arizona's Maricopa County during the 2022 election appears to show numerous people potentially engaging in illegal ballot harvesting.
What's interesting is that for many of the people captured on camera, the stacks they are placing into the drop box appear to have roughly the same amount of ballots.
Some were captured on video taking pictures of the multiple ballots they were depositing in the drop box.
Also, some of the people wore medical masks in their car, and one man even had a coat hood drawn tight over his head. He pulled a box of ballots out of his trunk.
Another man wore what looked like a bigfoot suit.
According to the time stamp shown on the video, which does match the format of the surveillance footage on the Maricopa County "Live Video Feed," these instances of what may have been illegal ballot harvesting took place throughout the early voting period and on Election Day itself.
Arizona law permits a family or household member or a caregiver to deliver a ballot on behalf of someone else to a drop box or polling place.
More: https://www.wnd.com/2022/11/watch-illegal-ballot-harvesting-allegedly-caught-camera-maricopa-county-report/ (https://www.wnd.com/2022/11/watch-illegal-ballot-harvesting-allegedly-caught-camera-maricopa-county-report/)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUoIfDJ8fBg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUoIfDJ8fBg)
-
This needs to be kept in the forefront as one of several things that needs to be addressed.
-
This needs to be kept in the forefront as one of several things that needs to be addressed.
What reason is there to be taking pictures of those stacks going in with cell phones--except someone is getting paid by the ballot.
-
What reason is there to be taking pictures of those stacks going in with cell phones--except someone is getting paid by the ballot.
:thumbsup:
-
While ballot harvest rings are illegal and need to be busted up, I'm more interested to see if harvesters filled out those ballots themselves, or even went as far as swapping those ballots out with Rat voting ballots, or even simply inserted whole cloth fake printed ballots into the mix.
Ballot harvesting or not, a high chunk of mail-in ballots get voted anyway. I don't see where runners bringing the minority that are out are going to sway very many elections. Even in my former heavily Rat dominated county, mail-ins were generally about a third of the vote, the rest were election day, in-office, or satellite.
Usually around 90% of those were returned, the remainder were a mix of all parties, with Indies the ones most not returned. Not even in a large metro county would it be enough to influence an election over 1% difference.
That can't be their secret to winning. It's got to be fake or altered votes.
-
While ballot harvest rings are illegal and need to be busted up, I'm more interested to see if harvesters filled out those ballots themselves, or even went as far as swapping those ballots out with Rat voting ballots, or even simply inserted whole cloth fake printed ballots into the mix.
Ballot harvesting or not, a high chunk of mail-in ballots get voted anyway. I don't see where runners bringing the minority that are out are going to sway very many elections. Even in my former heavily Rat dominated county, mail-ins were generally about a third of the vote, the rest were election day, in-office, or satellite.
Usually around 90% of those were returned, the remainder were a mix of all parties, with Indies the ones most not returned. Not even in a large metro county would it be enough to influence an election over 1% difference.
That can't be their secret to winning. It's got to be fake or altered votes.
Just one trick.
Figure X number of voters, subtract uncounted valid votes from GOP heavy precincts, substitute harvested ballots, and the numbers of total votes and voters seem more real.
Maricopa had problems in heavy GOP precincts only, not the heavy Dem ones.
Algorithms may apply as well.
-
Just one trick.
Figure X number of voters, subtract uncounted valid votes from GOP heavy precincts, substitute harvested ballots, and the numbers of total votes and voters seem more real.
Maricopa had problems in heavy GOP precincts only, not the heavy Dem ones.
Algorithms may apply as well.
Yep, another reason I don't like dragging elections out so far past poll voting day. See who hasn't voted off the registered list, and viola! A brand spankin' new straight Rat ballot!
-
Yep, another reason I don't like dragging elections out so far past poll voting day. See who hasn't voted off the registered list, and viola! A brand spankin' new straight Rat ballot!
I'll keep saying it in support of the potential associated with your claim.
This has to be squeaky clean. And it wasn't even close.
How do you screw things up this bad when the whole freaking nation is watching you ?
-
It's a bit of a pity nobody at all ever caught people doing this in 2020 on video and cell-phone tracking data.
Oh wait....
-
Lake's first lawsuit.
She needs to stick to finding those facts and not interpreting them.
They will tell the story themselves if there was something wrong.
Glad to see her pursuing this.
Maricopa County did an absolutely terrible job.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2022/11/25/kari-lake-files-first-lawsuit-over-midterm-election-results-n2616375
-
Lake's first lawsuit.
She needs to stick to finding those facts and not interpreting them.
They will tell the story themselves if there was something wrong.
Glad to see her pursuing this.
Maricopa County did an absolutely terrible job.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2022/11/25/kari-lake-files-first-lawsuit-over-midterm-election-results-n2616375
They did in 2020, too. But this appears to be even worse.
-
They did in 2020, too. But this appears to be even worse.
What's really disgusting is the lack of transparency with the Recorder.