The Briefing Room

General Category => Editorial/Opinion/Blogs => Topic started by: mystery-ak on October 26, 2014, 12:36:49 am

Title: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: mystery-ak on October 26, 2014, 12:36:49 am
http://www.youngcons.com/chicago-law-prof-on-obama-professors-hated-him-because-he-was-lazy-unqualified-never-attended-any-of-the-faculty-meetings/ (http://www.youngcons.com/chicago-law-prof-on-obama-professors-hated-him-because-he-was-lazy-unqualified-never-attended-any-of-the-faculty-meetings/)


David Rufful

Isn’t it refreshing to know we have such a competent Commander-in-Chief?
Doug Ross reported this and more: (http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2010/03/to-be-lawyer-or-not-to-be.html)

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered.


A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).
 

Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: mountaineer on October 26, 2014, 12:40:22 am
Quote
he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building
No surprise there.
Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: GourmetDan on October 26, 2014, 12:48:47 am
A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

Don't miss the point here.

Bambi was a 'post turtle' from way back...


Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: mountaineer on October 26, 2014, 12:51:49 am
Sure. Whose hand placed this idiot turtle on the post?
Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: Bigun on October 26, 2014, 01:16:33 am
Quote
The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

For some unknown reason I find this entirely believable!
Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: GourmetDan on October 26, 2014, 01:21:18 am
For some unknown reason I find this entirely believable!

So clearly our electoral process is so manipulated that an obvious loser like Bambi can be elected as president...


Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: Bigun on October 26, 2014, 01:27:33 am
So clearly our electoral process is so manipulated that an obvious loser like Bambi can be elected as president...

“No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders. “

Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, November 4, 1775

“Nothing is more certain than that a general profligacy and corruption of manners make a people ripe for destruction. A good form of government may hold the rotten materials together for some time, but beyond a certain pitch, even the best constitution will be ineffectual, and slavery must ensue.”

John Witherspoon, The Dominion of Providence Over the Passions of Men, 1776
Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: Fishrrman on October 26, 2014, 01:31:55 am
Sure. Whose hand placed this idiot turtle on the post?

I suspect it was someone associated with Valerie Jarrett…
Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: alicewonders on October 26, 2014, 01:40:46 am
Sure. Whose hand placed this idiot turtle on the post?

I think a wealthy Pakistani or Saudi Sheik, from his college days. 

Title: Re: Chicago Law Prof on Obama: “Professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified & never attended any of the faculty meetings”
Post by: massadvj on October 26, 2014, 03:37:52 am
Those who can't do teach.  Those who can't teach go into politics.