The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => Topic started by: Bigun on January 22, 2024, 01:21:46 am
-
BREAKING: Professor and Election Expert J. Halderman Hacks into Dominion Voting Machine in Court on Friday in Georgia in front of Judge Totenberg USING ONLY A PEN TO CHANGE VOTE TOTALS (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/breaking-professor-election-expert-j-halderman-hacks-dominion/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=breaking)
Update: After speaking with election integrity expert Garland Favorito we discovered the courtroom display was much more serious than we originally reported. J. Alex Halderman demonstrated in court how Dominion machines are hacked and their tabulations were altered.
A court drawing of J. Alex Halderman hacking a Dominion Voting Tabulator in court in Georgia on January 19, 2023, using only a pen! – via J. Alex Halderman on X
In June 2023, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia unsealed the 96-page Halderman Report – the Security Analysis of Georgia’s ImageCast X Ballot Marking Devices.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had been hiding this report from the public for two years.
University of Michigan Professor of Computer Science and Engineering J. Alex Halderman and Security Researcher and Assistant Professor at Auburn University Drew Sringall collaborated on the report where they discovered many exploitable vulnerabilities in the Dominion Voting Systems’ ImageCast X system.
Far-left Judge Amy Totenberg sealed and covered up the results of the investigation of Dominion voting machines in Georgia and sat on the report until this week.
As Americans Scramble to Protect Retirement Accounts With Physical Gold and Silver, A Faith-Based Company Shows Them How
The report confirmed that votes can be altered in the Dominion voting machines. In fact, the report revealed that the Dominion software is vulnerable and can be hacked.
Following its release, VoterGA founder Garland Favorito joined Steve Bannon on The War Room to discuss the findings from the explosive report.
Trump-hating Secretary of State Raffensperger hid this information from the public until 2023. Why was that?
Here is a copy of the Halderman Report released in June.
Halderman Report on Georgi… by Jim Hoft
Professor Halderman wrote about his findings in a blog post on Wednesday.
Back in September 2020, the Court granted the Curling Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security. Drew and I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers. The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction. This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.
Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place. While we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities have been exploited to change votes in past elections, without more precautions and mitigations, there is a serious risk that they will be exploited in the future.
After the release of the report, Professor Halderman tweeted that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger would not install Dominion’s security patches before the 2024 election.
Now this… on Friday, in a Federal Court In Atlanta, Georgia, J. Alex Halderman was able to HACK A DOMINION VOTING MACHINE to change the tabulation In Front Of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg in the courtroom!
excerpt, rest at link above
-
Trump-hating Secretary of State Raffensperger hid this information from the public until 2023. Why was that?
Because he was up for re-election in 2022, and he needed those exploits for his own campaign.
-
Professor Halderman wrote about his findings in a blog post on Wednesday.
Back in September 2020, the Court granted the Curling Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security. Drew and I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers. The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction. This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them.
Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia, including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place. While we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities have been exploited to change votes in past elections, without more precautions and mitigations, there is a serious risk that they will be exploited in the future.
After the release of the report, Professor Halderman tweeted that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger would not install Dominion’s security patches before the 2024 election.
Now this… on Friday, in a Federal Court In Atlanta, Georgia, J. Alex Halderman was able to HACK A DOMINION VOTING MACHINE to change the tabulation In Front Of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg in the courtroom!
@Bigun
I believe that is what gamblers call a "tell".
-
Because he was up for re-election in 2022, and he needed those exploits for his own campaign.
The SOB needs to be under the jail!
-
I have suspected that both parties have ignored the problems with election security, simply because elements of both parties have relied on those weaknesses at one time or another.
The Uniparty has to keep the 'balance of power' balanced to be able to keep this farce up.
-
I have suspected that both parties have ignored the problems with election security, simply because elements of both parties have relied on those weaknesses at one time or another.
The Uniparty has to keep the 'balance of power' balanced to be able to keep this farce up.
@Smokin Joe
I REALLY would LOVE to question that..................,BUT...................
-
Anyone that has systems knowledge knows how easy it is to hack a machine. However, I know with 100% certainty that if the manufacturer wants to alter data on their equipment, they can EASILY set that up. And I believe the truth of the matter is that it would take someone knowing the backdoor SECONDS to get in and alter data, and be out again, with no one the wiser.
If we as Americans want our republic back, it only happens with the END OF ELECTRONIC VOTING. As long as we have electronic voting, we will have FIXED ELECTIONS. PERIOD!!!!!!!
That means NO REPUBLIC
-
Another one of those quiet little articles that should have the effect of mountains falling and aircraft carrier sized cracks opening up in the earth.
Every jurisdiction that used Dominion machines has vote totals that are now suspect and unreliable. We now have no way of knowing if any of the elections where these things have been put in place are actually legit and who the actual winners really are.
-
Anyone that has systems knowledge knows how easy it is to hack a machine. However, I know with 100% certainty that if the manufacturer wants to alter data on their equipment, they can EASILY set that up. And I believe the truth of the matter is that it would take someone knowing the backdoor SECONDS to get in and alter data, and be out again, with no one the wiser.
If we as Americans want our republic back, it only happens with the END OF ELECTRONIC VOTING. As long as we have electronic voting, we will have FIXED ELECTIONS. PERIOD!!!!!!!
@jafo2010
I couldn't agree more,but I don't see it happening because the only people in a position to do that are the same people who benefit and enrich themselves through that system.
-
Another one of those quiet little articles that should have the effect of mountains falling and aircraft carrier sized cracks opening up in the earth.
Every jurisdiction that used Dominion machines has vote totals that are now suspect and unreliable. We now have no way of knowing if any of the elections where these things have been put in place are actually legit and who the actual winners really are.
:yowsa: Those are my thoughts exactly and they are not new.
-
Anyone that has systems knowledge knows how easy it is to hack a machine. However, I know with 100% certainty that if the manufacturer wants to alter data on their equipment, they can EASILY set that up. And I believe the truth of the matter is that it would take someone knowing the backdoor SECONDS to get in and alter data, and be out again, with no one the wiser.
If we as Americans want our republic back, it only happens with the END OF ELECTRONIC VOTING. As long as we have electronic voting, we will have FIXED ELECTIONS. PERIOD!!!!!!!
That means NO REPUBLIC
In Buffalo NY (Highly Demoncrat) The Dems would set the initial tally +500 for Dems and -500 for Republicans.
-
Our report explains how attackers could exploit the flaws we found
to change votes or potentially even affect election outcomes in Georgia,
including how they could defeat the technical and procedural protections the state has in place.
While we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities
have been exploited to change votes in past elections,
without more precautions and mitigations,
there is a serious risk that they will be exploited in the future.
Imagine a bank saying about their computer,
"While we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities
have been exploited to change balances in existing accounts,
(because we don't know what the balances are supposed to be,
but only what the computer tells us the balances are now.)"
It is NOT enough for the state to say,
"You can't prove the election was stolen!"
The state needs to be able to say honestly,
"The election was NOT stolen. Here is the proof."
These professors have now proven in court that
the election very well COULD have been stolen!
-
Imagine a bank saying about their computer,
"While we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities
have been exploited to change balances in existing accounts,
(because we don't know what the balances are supposed to be,
but only what the computer tells us the balances are now.)"
It is NOT enough for the state to say,
"You can't prove the election was stolen!"
The state needs to be able to say honestly,
"The election was NOT stolen. Here is the proof."
These professors have now proven in court that
the election very well COULD have been stolen!
:yowsa: pointing-up