Speaker Gingrich exposed Megyn Kelly as a Clinton supporter.
Some nerve claiming to be concerned about women, yet working as hard as she does to destroy Trump and get Bill Clinton back into the east wing. Let's not forget how she objectified herself by posing seductively in GQ and also engaging in dirty talk with Howard Stern. And yet here she is claiming to be concerned about sexual predation.
She's a joke, not a journalist.
Speaker Gingrich exposed Megyn Kelly as a Clinton supporter.
:amen:
Gingrich looked and sounded desperate.
As far as women not coming forward, I imagine there are many who are afraid to with the maniac trump attack team.
Mark Cuban was on TV talking about two he knows and has talked to on the phone who will not come forward, because of
family concerns.
Of course there is the woman anchor on CNN who personally knows and vouches for another victim who will not come forward.
American cannot elect a certified pervert for president.
Megyn is taking the same bitch pills that hillary is getting.
They must have the same doctor.
We remember Speaker Gingrich in 2012 when he slapped down the questioner in the moderated primary debate in Georgia. It was a salacious question meant to damage the Speaker. However, Gingrich brilliantly pointed out the biased questioning with a few choice words, and we all cheered.
Now that Speaker Gingrich is supporting our America First republican nominee, the NeverTrump/Hillary-for-president contingent here throws him under the bus and instead cheers the biased questioner. I refer specifically to stinkspur.
We're not blind. We see what you NeverTrumpers are doing.
I thought Megyn was unbearable..
Megyn is taking the same bitch pills that hillary is getting.
They must have the same doctor.
Now that Speaker Gingrich is supporting our America First republican nominee, the NeverTrump/Hillary-for-president contingent here throws him under the bus and instead cheers the biased questioner. I refer specifically to stinkspur.
Oh, and for the record, Trump isn't 'America First' He's 'Trump First'.
We remember Speaker Gingrich in 2012 when he slapped down the questioner in the moderated primary debate in Georgia. It was a salacious question meant to damage the Speaker. However, Gingrich brilliantly pointed out the biased questioning with a few choice words, and we all cheered.
Now that Speaker Gingrich is supporting our America First republican nominee, the NeverTrump/Hillary-for-president contingent here throws him under the bus and instead cheers the biased questioner. I refer specifically to stinkspur.
We're not blind. We see what you NeverTrumpers are doing.
SpeakerProgressive embarrassment Gingrich exposedMegyn Kelly as a Clinton supporterhimself as a loudmouth horses ass.
I thought Megyn was unbearable..
I thought Newt got in some good points about sex taking precedence over issues that matter, YET AGAIN, but whose fault is that? Trump's.@Weird Tolkienish Figure
Trump is his own worst enemy.
Newt couldn't really convincingly defend Trump's poll numbers or convince me that he really believed Trump would win.
@Weird Tolkienish Figure'
Newt wants a job in Trump Admin., as does Giuliani, Chris Christi, Huckabee, and the brain surgeon.
Newt turned off more women by accusing Megyn Kelly of being obsessed with sex. It is Trump who is obsessed with sex and the media is going to report what Trump says. Newt tried to push that onto Kelly and that is attacking another woman about sex. Newt has turned into another Trump.
I got kicked off TOS in 2012 for being anti-Noot. It is no surprise that FDR-worshiping, Nancy Pelosi-snuggling, no leadership skills having, Inner Beltway living, Establishment loving, Progressive Noot Gingrich would support a liberal like Trump.
Noot sucks, and so does Trump.
Oh, and for the record, Trump isn't 'America First' He's 'Trump First'.
We remember Speaker Gingrich in 2012 when he slapped down the questioner in the moderated primary debate in Georgia. It was a salacious question meant to damage the Speaker. However, Gingrich brilliantly pointed out the biased questioning with a few choice words, and we all cheered.
Now that Speaker Gingrich is supporting our America First republican nominee, the NeverTrump/Hillary-for-president contingent here throws him under the bus and instead cheers the biased questioner. I refer specifically to stinkspur.
We're not blind. We see what you NeverTrumpers are doing.
I thought Newt got in some good points about sex taking precedence over issues that matter, YET AGAIN, but whose fault is that? Trump's.
Trump is his own worst enemy.
==================================
These people have 'HILLARY CLINTON' tattooed across their foreheads in neon puke green.
Of course, beyond any shadow of a doubt, shape or form these are progressive neocon rino operatives of the first order.
No question about it.
Now that Speaker Gingrich is supporting our America First republican nominee, the NeverTrump/Hillary-for-president contingent here throws him under the bus and instead cheers the biased questioner. I refer specifically to stinkspur.
Megyn is taking the same bitch pills that hillary is getting.
They must have the same doctor.
Noot was forceful and made a good point about the ratio of press coverage after the debate. But once he went after her for the 'sexual predator' reference, Kelly quoted Trump's own words which in essence a description of what sexual predators do. Game, set, match.
Trump is also our worst enemy.
So Gingrich said that Trump is ahead in early voting in Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania doesn't have early voting. So how does that work, lol?
People involved with winning campaigns don't have on-air meltdowns. And as for "fascinated with sex", Kelly should have asked the repulsive obese troll-faced hack how many times he's been married.
Trump is a sexual predator. Period. End of discussion. Deal with it, bleep.
So a guy who served one of his ex wives divorce papers while she was in the hospital bed with cancer...and carried on an affair with a staffer (now third wife) while lecturing Bill Clinton over Monica Lewinsky is defending a...by his own admissions...sexual predator?
@CatherineofAragon
He's been married 3 times. She's been married twice. She's a lot younger then him so give her time.
I thought Megyn was unbearable..
http://www.redstate.com/aglanon/2016/10/25/newt-gingrich-to-megyn-kelly-you-are-fascinated-with-sex-and-you-dont-care-about-public-policy-video/One of the worst aspects of the Trump candidacy is that he has turned many erstwhile reputable conservatives into servile a**-kissers trying their best to cover the stinking messes their slimy master has made.
Worth noting that back when Bill Clinton was dealing more heavily with the accusations against him (which it’s laughable Newt pretends wasn’t covered), the pushback was that Republicans were “obsessed with sex.” And of course Republicans, including Newt, said that was ridiculous and that this was a character issue.
But as is the case with everything else in the Trump orbit, #LOLnothingmatters.
This wasn’t even all the crazy. He also spent the first half of the interview completely denying all polling and sounding like his analysis was given under duress. Has anyone confirmed that his loved ones are safe? Did Trump kidnap them and tell Newt he has 24 hours to turn the tide?
Newt is an adulterer. As far as I've read all of his affairs were with willing participants who were adults.
Can the same be said of Bill Clinton? Did Newt knowingly lie to defend a child rapist?
Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape of 13-year-old
There really is no comparison between the two.
@driftdiver
Is she a serial adulterer? Has she engaged in multiple affairs during both marriages? Did she serve divorce papers on her husband while he was recovering from cancer?
A lot of people have been married more than once. My husband's sister is married to her second husband, but she sure as hell isn't a moral sewer like Newt Gingrich.
So was Ginnifer Flowers...Lewinsky...a former Miss America...etc etc
Yes.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/12/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-alleged-rape-lawsuit
Only to people totally in the tank for Donny is there no difference.
Agree. I thought Gingrich gave a good defense. Kelly looked like she had an agenda.
So you don't believe in people getting their day in court.Indeed I do. I'm not one of the ones here saying "these women are either lying or deserved what they got" as some are doing.
I mean its quite obvious that most of these trolls came out of the wood work because he was running for President. They'll go away after the election just as fast as they appeared.
Trumps a scum bag. hard to believe folks are defending the Clintons as the moral model though.
@skeeter
Megyn is an entertainer first and foremost. She does whatever gets ratings. I used to like her but she's become a hateful troll since she got this timeslot.
No one here is defending the Clintons. That's an overly simplistic and false description.
We're showing they are merely two sides of the same coin.
Indeed I do. I'm not one of the ones here saying "these women are either lying or deserved what they got" as some are doing.
No they didn't just appear out of no where. this isn't just a recent problem with Trump either. There are 20 previous lawsuits he's had to settle over this very issue. That's a pattern of misconduct...not recent revelations by opportunistic trolls.
And besides...he opened the door for all of this to happen with the boats of being able to do what he wanted with women.
No one here is defending the Clintons. That's an overly simplistic and false description.
We're showing they are merely two sides of the same coin.
Dunno, she accused her first husband of cheating on her while she was on TV. Something he denies.
You threw a host of insults at Newt (fat troll and so on) and implied she was innocent. I simply posted that her marriage history isn't perfect.
Nobody's perfect. Trump is a serial womanizer. So is Hillary and her husband. The double standard she is applying is quite obvious.
Its really too bad someone like Cruz didn't get the nomination.
I liked Newt last go round, enough to phone bank for him. Still respect his knowledge and his brain - there are few sharper practical Repubs out there.
He did get his ass handed to him, neatly sliced and wrapped, this interview.
Agree. I thought Gingrich gave a good defense. Kelly looked like she had an agenda.I thought Newt handled himself quite well. Kelly came across as a b@tch. Fox news needs to can her.
I thought Newt handled himself quite well. Kelly came across as a b@tch. Fox news needs to can her.
It's really interesting how differently people see that interview. I thought he very clearly got under her skin -- she obviously grew more angry as the interview went on. She made two somewhat contradictory statements: 1) the massive time disparity is justified if Trump is a sexual predator, while conceding Newt's point that 2) we don't know if he is a sexual predator. Well, if you don't know it, then the time disparity it not justified.
As much as Trump deserved to be hammered as a consequence of that first Fox-moderated primary debate, I also think Kelly has diminished herself by making a "Womyn's Crusade" the most important thing in this election. I thought Newt's observation was generally correct, though he'd have been better off phrasing it as "gender issues" rather than "sex". For Kelly and some other women, it at least seems that this election has morphed into venting about pent-up gender frustrations, which seems somewhat irrational to me given that who is elected likely isn't going to affect any of those underlying issues one tiny bit. Kelly, at least, seems pretty obsessed by that, to the point where the "Womyn's Crusade" is not only the most important issue in the election, but actually more important than every other issue combined.
As a matter of politics, that may even be correct. Pissed-off women likely will decide this election in Hillary's favor. Though I think Newt is correct in pointing out that assigning such primacy to those issues shouldn't be the route for rational people. And no, I'm not saying that means people shouldn't vote for Trump. I'm simply saying that not voting for him solely on that basis seems rather messed up.
She came across as someone laying out a careful case against Trump. Newt's the one who flew off the handle, just as his boss does.I totally disagree.....your hate for Trump is showing. 8888forgot
Kelly's a brilliant interviewer and won't be going anywhere. Her counterpart, Hannity, is a dolt who couldn't get a job outside a far right media.
I totally disagree.....your hate for Trump is showing. 8888forgot
Who got angry? Newt. It was obvious.
Yes, I don't like Trump. But anyone who thought Newt came out on the better end of that interview (hell, he's still tweeting about it this morning) is showing his own confirmation bias.
You don't think she's pissed off when she mentions his "anger issues" at the end?
Look, I'm not saying that Newt didn't get angry. But he's the interviewee, and is supposed to be partisan. It's her job as the interviewer not to get emotionally involved in the subject matter, which she very clearly did. At least in my opinion. If his goal was to show that she has taken "a side" (and I think that was his primary goal), I think he succeeded. If he comes across as angry, I don't think he much cares.
Maybe. But she didn't come across as angry. Newt lost his cool. Do you think any non-Trump supporter watching that interview came away with a better feeling about Trump?
I don't.
Maybe that's why we see this differently.
I don't think the Newt's purpose in doing that interview was to make anyone watching it feel better about Trump. I think his goal in doing that interview was to make Kelly (and others in the media) look bad. If Newt himself looks bad in the process, I don't think he cared. He wanted to illustrate/emphasize media bias, and I think he accomplished that goal. Too much attention is being paid to the sexual stuff, and not enough to the substantive issues.
Newt looked bad, Trump looked bad. I don't know why you think making the media look bad will help Trump.
Yes Newt looked bad and trump looked bad. Kelly looked like most people.....fed up with the trump supporters on TV and the attempts to defend the pervert by bringing up examples
of other misdeeds by Bill.
I don't think anything Gingrich, etc., can do would make Trump look better. I think it is possible for surrogates like that make the media look worse by suggesting it is too heavily biased towards Hilary, and that makes her look worse.
Also, I do think there are some voters -- I'm one myself -- for whom the feeling that it is the media and Establishment deciding our elections is deeply disturbing. It was actually the ganging up on Trump, and (to me) downplaying of Hillary's foibles that moved me from NeverTrump to NeverHillary. The message Gingrich was trying to send was that "the fix is in", and hoping that has some appeal. I think it probably does. Not enough to actually win the race on its own, but about the most you can ask/expect a surrogate to be able to do on behalf of a candidate.
In other words, Gingrich is making an appeal to the "vote for Trump just to stick it to them" crowd.
Newt is not trying to appeal to people who have already decided how much they hate Trump and will not vote for him. There's no point in it. He's trying to appeal to people who are undecided/persuadable by pointing out to them how biased the media narrative is.
If you judge newt by the metric of "he didn't do anything to convince me that Trump isn't a scumbag who doesn't deserve my vote", then you're not whom Newt was targeting anyway. So in terms of what I think Newt was aiming to do, and who he was trying to reach, I thought he did well as possible in the face of a journalist who is so openly opposed to a particular candidate.
The trump surrogates are adulterers personified. Every one of them lied and cheated their spouses.
newtie is the last person on earth to have a shred of believability on the matter of the way women are treated. Not by him, not by roody, not by limbo, and not by the candidate himself.
The trump surrogates are adulterers personified. Every one of them lied and cheated their spouses.
newtie is the last person on earth to have a shred of believability on the matter of the way women are treated. Not by him, not by roody, not by limbo, and not by the candidate himself.
Its really too bad someone like Cruz didn't get the nomination.
What makes you think that Ted Cruz would have escaped the same fate as Donald Trump?
Cruz had his own issues that Hillary media operatives would have turned into media gold. Born outside United States of an immigrant father, for starters. And if not that, they would've just made up crap to smear him with...it's what they do to Republicans. In my opinion Ted Cruz would've been toast two months ago, with the polls showing Hillary +75 points....
What makes you think that Ted Cruz would have escaped the same fate as Donald Trump?
Cruz had his own issues that Hillary media operatives would have turned into media gold. Born outside United States of an immigrant father, for starters. And if not that, they would've just made up crap to smear him with...it's what they do to Republicans. In my opinion Ted Cruz would've been toast two months ago, with the polls showing Hillary +75 points....
Speaker Gingrich exposed Megyn Kelly as a Clinton supporter.
Only the Alt Right crazies think Cruz wouldn't have wiped the floor with Hillary.
On that we are in agreement.
You're absolutely correct, and I'm wrong.
After all, NeverTrumpers have such a sterling track record; as in, you guys have been dead wrong about everything Trump, starting with predictions that he would never be the nominee. In fact you NeverTrumpers were predicting every month since the day he declared that his candidacy was over, that he would deliberately drop out of the race and hand the victory to Hillary by design. Pretty sterling record...on being dead wrong. You guys have been goofy at every turn.
Totally !! We coulda had a V-8... and we coulda had a Ted Cruz. Sad, ain't it?
They read michael Moore thoughts on the election on the radio this morning, the guy sounded like he was ready to go out and vote trump. I thought I was hallucinating. But he said basically the same thing. Trump has s a vector for the nations malcontents to register their unhappiness with the political process in the country. I believe that, barring any other really bad tapes of trump out there, his poll numbers will trend towards where they were prior to pussygate.
Except now, when it really matters. We told you the media would destroy Trump, we told you there was stuff in his background that would come out, we told you that he wouldn't be able to resist sabotaging his own campaign.
It's all happening.
Except now, when it really matters. We told you the media would destroy Trump, we told you there was stuff in his background that would come out, we told you that he wouldn't be able to resist sabotaging his own campaign.
It's all happening.
I wouldn't say that, as she's rough on many fuests.
But she did flat-out lie and misrepresent what Trump said.
Even though I don't like Trump at all, that's just dishonest and wrong.
I agree...and I believe she intentionally set Newt up.
To me Megyn is unwatchable, she is so in the tank for Hillary.
She sure handed Newt his ass.
Will any Trump symp come out of this campaign with a better reputation than before they went in? Doubtful. Newt and Rudy are parodies.
Did you type "dirty talk with Howard Stern" and "objectifying" with a straight face? LOL!!!
Trump is as big a sexual predator as Clinton. How many women did he grope who won't come forward?
This interview will do wonders to improve Trump's standing with women.
We remember Speaker Gingrich in 2012 when he slapped down the questioner in the moderated primary debate in Georgia. It was a salacious question meant to damage the Speaker. However, Gingrich brilliantly pointed out the biased questioning with a few choice words, and we all cheered.
Now that Speaker Gingrich is supporting our America First republican nominee, the NeverTrump/Hillary-for-president contingent here throws him under the bus and instead cheers the biased questioner. I refer specifically to stinkspur.
We're not blind. We see what you NeverTrumpers are doing.
One of the things that "bugs" me about not supporting Trump is the lengths to which nevertrumpers will go to claim any Trump supporter was wrong and looked like a fool.
Gingrich absolutely destroyed Kelly. He exposed her as a hillary supporter, a tool of the establishment and a hypocrite. The final nail in her coffin was when she wouldn't call Bill clinton a sexual predator.
In their emotionally altered universe, NeverTrumpers have thrown every single lifetime, solid conservative supporter of the REPUBLICAN NOMINEE under the .... under the bus888
It's an astounding alteration of reality.
You don't think she's pissed off when she mentions his "anger issues" at the end?
Look, I'm not saying that Newt didn't get angry. But he's the interviewee, and is supposed to be partisan. It's her job as the interviewer not to get emotionally involved in the subject matter, which she very clearly did. At least in my opinion. If his goal was to show that she has taken "a side" (and I think that was his primary goal), I think he succeeded. If he comes across as angry, I don't think he much cares.
Gingrich made that point when he talked about the amount of time she spent on Wikileaks content vs the Trump charges.
Only us prudish Ned Flanders types care any more. Everyone else is voting Trump.
One thing a lot of people do not realize is when a guy has billions of dollars as well as a reputation of a womanizer he does not need to chase women and impose on them rudely.
I thought Megyn was unbearable..
I listened to a woman on Beck's show this morning and, like them, felt as if I must have been watching an entirely different interview. I simply don't get it.
She sure handed Newt his ass.
It is really a travesty that the American public is stuck with two miserable candidates for the highest office in the land.
A crook and a creep.
It all depends what you think the purpose/focus of the interview was. If you think the focus of the interview was Trump's own behavior, you probably think Kelly came off well. If you think it was media bias, you'd think Gingrich won. Kelly and Gingrich themselves were viewing it from opposite perspectives, which is why it was a trainwreck.
The point of discussing this is, regardless of who the two individuals are who are representing their party in this election, the press, which enjoys a special place in our governmental system, are massively and openly abusing the trust put in them and the special privileges allowed them by actively and in concert working to overturn the will of the people.
It all depends what you think the purpose/focus of the interview was. If you think the focus of the interview was Trump's own behavior, you probably think Kelly came off well. If you think it was media bias, you'd think Gingrich won. Kelly and Gingrich themselves were viewing it from opposite perspectives, which is why it was a trainwreck.
The point of discussing this is, regardless of who the two individuals are who are representing their party in this election, the press, which enjoys a special place in our governmental system, are massively and openly abusing the trust put in them and the special privileges allowed them by actively and in concert working to overturn the will of the people.
Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are! :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :tongue2:
We're not blind. We see what you NeverTrumpers are doing.