Tampering with evidence??  Isn't that punishable under law?

It is -- unless you are a well-connected Democrat.  Well-connected Democrats have privilege in its original sense, a private law that applies only to them, rather than the law that applies to everyone else.  (cf. the Democrats-only mens rea clause the FBI created out of thin air in the statute governing mishandling of classified documents so they wouldn't have to pursue the prima facia case against Hillary Clinton.)

You want a real explosion? Check into what happened in Halifax, Nova Scotia or Beirut, Lebanon.
Like you said, every industry has its risks.

Don't forget the Texas City explosion in Galveston Bay.

Oil and gas companies are making record profits. The greatest in their history.

Well the greatest since Obama, anyway.

Well, gawrsh... 

That video won you a lot of fans on TBR, @jmyrlefuller!

Well, the Stanford professors are using the word solar for panels that generate electricity at night so I guess I can also.

Had you bothered to actually read the article before posting it, you would have seen that the amount in question was 0.025% of daytime output.  So to match the 15 acres of daytime output at Stihl, one would need over 93 square miles of these "special" panels.

From your article:

There are still a lot of questions to be answered before any commercial application can be rolled out, Geoff Smith, emeritus professor in applied physics at The University of Technology Sydney, wrote in an email response to questions. Smith, who was aware of the research but not involved, has doubts that it ever will be an economically viable source of energy.

"Adding complexity and avenues for degradation to renewable energy systems despite being scientifically interesting rarely makes it in practice," he wrote.

Hey how about rebutting me on the ivermectin/Japan thing.

What kind of rebuttal are you looking for?  Are you disputing that Japan has one of the oldest populations in the world?