The Briefing Room
General Category => Editorial/Opinion/Blogs => Topic started by: mystery-ak on March 31, 2021, 01:01:36 pm
-
March 31, 2021
The Supreme Court: Cowards, Crooks, or Compromised?
By Andrew W. Coy
They appear to be cowards or crooks or compromised. Cowards, crooks, or compromised seems to be the only way to explain the decision-making of the United States Supreme Court. The Court's unwillingness to make any decisions regarding the presidential election of 2020 is a historic failure. These last twelve months have seen the Court refuse to do its duty. The Court refused to be a co-equal branch of the federal government.
With the Bush v. Gore of 2000, there is legal precedent. Just twenty short years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court took Bush v. Gore, a presidential election case, so the precedent was there. Over this last year, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to address election law questions before the election last summer, right before the election, right after the election, and even prior to the inauguration in January. On all these occasions, the majority of the Supreme Court judges refused to hear any case dealing with the presidential election. They stuck their heads in the sand and acted as if they had no role.
more
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/03/the_supreme_court_cowards_crooks_or_compromised.html
-
The USSC has always been a political body.
So the most applicable word is "mostly crooks".
-
Compromised cowards...with three exceptions in the current court.
-
Another worthless article from American Stinker.
-
The title reads and presumes:
"Cowards, Crooks, or Compromised?"
Thomas, Alito -- none of the above (certainly not)
Roberts -- compromised (of course)
Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett -- cowards (in all likelihood, they were intimidated into submission by Roberts)
Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan -- communists.
How's that hit ya...?
-
The title reads and presumes:
"Cowards, Crooks, or Compromised?"
Thomas, Alito -- none of the above (certainly not)
Roberts -- compromised (of course)
Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett -- cowards (in all likelihood, they were intimidated into submission by Roberts)
Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan -- communists.
How's that hit ya...?
That'll do until we have evidence to the contrary.
-
The title reads and presumes:
"Cowards, Crooks, or Compromised?"
Thomas, Alito -- none of the above (certainly not)
Roberts -- compromised (of course)
Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett -- cowards (in all likelihood, they were intimidated into submission by Roberts)
Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan -- communists.
How's that hit ya...?
I agree, except Roberts is compromised AND a crook.