The Briefing Room
General Category => Editorial/Opinion/Blogs => Topic started by: rangerrebew on October 20, 2019, 01:46:34 pm
-
Decorated CIA Officer: Adam Schiff’s Anonymous Whistleblowers May Not Even Exist
I recently raised the possibility with Kevin Shipp, a decocrated CIA Officer turned whistleblower, about intrigue that Congressman’s Adam Schiff’s alleged anti-Trump Ukraine whistleblowers may not even exist.
The conversation was before Schiff said Tuesday that his star witnesses – who nobody has seen — would not testify to Congress. And would not testify anywhere.
Shipp, now retired from the Agency, on his weekly Intel show on CrowdSource the Truth had an interesting take on Adam Schiff and what appears to be a Deep-State play.
Here is the exchange:
https://truepundit.com/decorated-cia-officer-adam-schiffs-anonymous-whistleblowers-may-not-even-exist/
-
Decorated CIA Officer: Adam Schiff’s Anonymous Whistleblowers May Not Even Exist
Sure they do! They are members of Schiff's blowup doll collection and they whistle when he lets the air out.
-
Of course he doesn't exist. How can a so called 'anonymous' whistleblower receive death threats if nobody knows who he is? The whole thing is just more stupid kabuki theater to harass Trump, to protect Biden and other Democrats, and to kill time until the next election.
-
I also have, half seriously, speculated that this leakblower might in fact be a fictional composite of several leakers. No one in their right mind believes the leakblower would be in the slightest danger were his/her identity known and (s)he made his/her claims in public. The secrecy is concealing something, not protecting the leakblower from harm.
-
I sensed the same thing about "the whistleblower" a few days' back in another thread -- that is, he may not exist at all, but rather serves as "the MacGuffin" (a la Hitchcock) in the democrat-communists' impeachment scenario.
If this is the case, this could really blow up in the demo-commies' faces.
Question: how many Republicans are "sitting in" on the closed sessions that lil' Schiff is holding?
-
That is exactly the reason why the law forces the accuser to face the accused.
To do otherwise makes a mockery of all of our laws.
-
That is exactly the reason why the law forces the accuser to face the accused.
To do otherwise makes a mockery of all of our laws.
Except.... that it doesn't....
or hasn't....
in Trump's case.
And make no mistake.... going forward (pardon expression)....
if the radical left gets the power back.... they will treat every one of us on the right the same way they've treated Trump.
-
That is exactly the reason why the law forces the accuser to face the accused.
To do otherwise makes a mockery of all of our laws.
During the Inquisition, prisoners were forced to name a certain number of 'others' under torture (witches, traitors, malcontents, etc.) or they would be killed. They would frequently simply name a few names they knew at random, and then those people would be arrested with no charge, accuser, and no evidence, and the system would perpetuate that way. All the accusers were nameless.
A person could accuse his neighbor or a shop owner anonymously for no reason other than he wanted his property or maybe his even wife. Anonymous accusers do in fact change justice from a matter of actual 'law' into more of a political thing.
-
Naming relatives and friends,, was quite the thing in the USSR, and their showcaase satellite, East Germany.
Even kids ratting out their parents.
Oscar Prize winning film, "The Lives of Others."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lives_of_Others