Richard Grenell
@RichardGrenell
you have to suspend common sense to believe fraud only happened on one race of a long ballot.
They didn’t have faith in their election - there were too many discrepancies. They threw out 150k ballots over 10 cases? Absurd.
11:05 AM · Nov 17, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1328730917423091712
Mindy Robinson @iheartmindy
Dominion Voting System donated thousands of dollars to an anti-Trump Republican PAC linked to our Sec of State in Nevada.
Explain to me exactly “what†an election company is doing donating to ANY political side of an election they are contracted to run?
https://360newslasvegas.com/nv-repub-insiders-took-from-dominion-election-systems/
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnTCs0tVcAAQhlO?format=jpg&name=small)
4:38 PM · Nov 20, 2020·
https://twitter.com/iheartmindy/status/1329901868315623424
Josh Gerstein
@joshgerstein
JUST IN: Carson City, NV judge hearing election challenge filed by Trump electors has set a hearing for 12/3 at 130PM local. Will allow 15 depositions for each side between now and then. Atty is @SidneyPowell1's co-counsel in Flynn case, @jbinnall
.5:44 PM · Nov 24, 2020·TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1331368112332091395
Huge court win lets Trump present ballot evidence, could overturn Nevada result
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/huge-court-win-lets-trump-present-ballot-evidence-could-overturn-nevada-result (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/huge-court-win-lets-trump-present-ballot-evidence-could-overturn-nevada-result)
From the article:But its biggest claim was that the signatures on hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were not verified by human officials, as required by law.
What’s more, they found that officials used a machine to verify signatures, apparently against the rules, and even those machines were plagued with problems.
Schlapp said he is eager to get a chance to finally show its evidence of fraud and for the campaign to present the thousands of examples of signature machine errors. Since many states require signature verification, that is where the campaign’s fraud investigation is focused.
Here again lies the Constitutional issue. The Constitution specifically states that the legislature of a State determines election rules. But in Nevada, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona, the rules set forth by their respective legislatures were ignored. A Constitutional win in Nevada could cascade into the other races.
It's a pity the Judge is not serious about the election. 12/3 is a rotten date for a hearing, considering the Safe Harbor provision requiring State Certifications of the Election is 12/8. The judge kicked the can down the road far enough to make sure the water is still muddy by then.
In case it's escaped notice, I'm pizzed as Hell about this.
That's all true @Cyber Liberty but the same issue is being brought up in many states. Not just in Nevada.
According to Trump officials, the judge set a Dec. 3 hearing date and is allowing 15 depositions. What’s more, the campaign plans to present its evidence that could result in the rejection of tens of thousands of mail-in ballots in Democratic Clark County where Biden ballots outnumbered Trump ballots by 91,000 in unofficial results.
[…]
Oddly, there has been a virtual news blackout of the Trump court victory. However, there were major headlines on the state Supreme Court’s certification of Biden’s victory Tuesday.
In its court filing from Nov. 17, the Trump team made several allegations of voter fraud, including votes by nonresidents and the dead.
[…]
But its biggest claim was that the signatures on hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were not verified by human officials, as required by law.
What’s more, they found that officials used a machine to verify signatures, apparently against the rules, and even those machines were plagued with problems.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2020/11/25/trump-legal-team-scores-a-big-win-in-nevada-n2580692
BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned.
— Mark Meadows (@MarkMeadows) November 25, 2020
This thing still has legs.
I thought this was dead. This IS great news!!
This thing still has legs.
And I am not talking about an uncarved turkey on a platter.
(https://i.imgur.com/7sEP6gN.png)
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
A judge in Nevada has ordered Clark County officials to allow an inspection of the elections equipment and sealed containers used in the 2020 election by 1:00 P.M. tomorrow. @RichardGrenell
12:03 AM · Dec 1, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1333637865255923712
(https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1334612831615012866/G6IpaGX2?format=jpg&name=small)
https://thenationalpulse.com/news/nevada-fraud-hearing-obstruction-machines-dead/
A District Court judge in Carson City on Friday ruled against an attempt by President Donald Trump’s campaign to overturn Nevada’s presidential election results, saying there was insufficient evidence to support fraud accusations.
Judge James Russell issued his order after hearing several hours of argument from attorneys representing both Trump and President-elect Joe Biden’s campaigns on Thursday.
Trump’s campaign echoed the president’s own calls of voter fraud and alleged that Clark County election staff failed to address 40,000 cases of double voting and thousands more illegal votes from the deceased or voters who do not live in Nevada.
Democrats argued the challenge did not identify a single voter who allegedly committed fraud, nor did it provide any other evidence to warrant overturning the will of the majority of Nevada’s 1.4 million voters.