The Briefing Room
State Chapters => Florida => Topic started by: libertybele on June 01, 2022, 08:07:05 pm
-
Florida sheriff debunks theory pushed by gun control advocates after Uvalde, warns active shooters what will happen to them
Florida Sheriff Grady Judd, the top cop in Polk County, pushed back on Tuesday against those who claim the Uvalde massacre proves more armed personnel on school grounds do not thwart active shooters.
What is the claim?
Proponents of gun control have seized on the Uvalde atrocity to advance their opposition to arming teachers and beefing up security personnel at schools.
In the case of Uvalde, the killer was inside the school for more than one hour before police killed him. The school had a resource officer (who was not present at the school when the killer first attacked), and dozens of law enforcement personnel stood outside the school while the gunman was inside on his killing rampage.
MSNBC columnist Zeeshan Aleem, for example, argued that because police officers failed to stop the killer before he murdered nearly two dozen people, teachers definitively could not have stopped him..........
..............."MSNBC doesn’t know so much about what they’re talking about, but that’s not unusual. If they did, they could create the training program, and we’d never have another active shooter," Judd said.
"But at the end of the day, as simple as it may sound, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun," he added. "There needs to be multiple people on that campus in advance, well trained, who are prepared to and can go in and stop the threat. And why those 19 police officers did [not do] that, I don't know."..........
https://www.theblaze.com/news/grady-judd-debunks-pro-gun-control-theory
-
The fact that the school had an SRO who was not present disproves the idea that an armed officer or teacher on campus could hinder or stop a school shooter? What moron is propagating that non sequitor?