The Briefing Room
General Category => Politics/Government => Topic started by: mystery-ak on October 14, 2019, 04:37:49 pm
-
October 14, 2019
Schiff is getting nervous
By Monica Showalter
House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, stands at the center of the impeachment of the president scam.
And as word gets out about his real game and how he got it — through a spying operation aimed at the White House that he directed, he's starting to get weirdly wobbly.
Two instances just from the weekend are starting to stand out.
First, in stark contrast to the big hullabaloo he made about hearing from the so-called "whistleblower" in Congress ahead of the planned Trump execution, Schiff suddenly doesn't think the whistleblower is so very, very necessary to testify at his hearings at all:
"We don't need the whistleblower who wasn't on the call to tell us what took place during the call," he claimed.
According to National Review:
House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff (D., Calif.) announced on Sunday that the whistleblower at the center of an impeachment inquiry into President Trump may not testify before Congress due to concerns over the person's safety.
"Our primary interest right now is making sure that that person is protected," Schiff told interviewers on CBS's Face the Nation.
Schiff explained that Democrats may be able to gather enough evidence to impeach Trump without revealing the person's identity.
Trump blasted Schiff's comments on Twitter on Monday morning .
"Adam Schiff now doesn't seem to want the Whistleblower to testify. NO!" Trump wrote. "We must determine the Whistleblower's identity to determine WHY this was done to the USA."
more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/10/schiff_is_getting_nervous.html (https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/10/schiff_is_getting_nervous.html)
-
"We don't need the whistleblower who wasn't on the call to tell us what took place during the call," he (Schitt) claimed."
So, Schitt is capable of making a factual statement. Is he too stupid to see that this admission obviates the entire fake impeachment?
-
"We don't need the whistleblower who wasn't on the call to tell us what took place during the call," he (Schitt) claimed."
So, Schitt is capable of making a factual statement. Is he too stupid to see that this admission obviates the entire fake impeachment?
He just doesn't want the Republicans to shoot this bullshit into a million shards by questioning the Schitt plant. I think we can all reasonably assume he doesn't give two Schitts about anybody's safety, other than his own.
This could very well backfire so badly Schitt loses his "safe" seat.
-
This could very well backfire so badly Schitt loses his "safe" seat.
What a lovely thought!
-
He has to keep Schiffting as his various dodges get exposed. That's what happens when the truth contradicts your narrative. You have to keep your goalposts on a cart for ease of movement.
-
If anyone has the inside scoop on Schiff it's AmericanThinker.