Author Topic: The Killing of Bernell Trammell  (Read 135 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Luis Gonzalez

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,884
  • Gender: Male
  • Better to the grave with memories than dreams
    • Boiling Frogs
The Killing of Bernell Trammell
« on: Wednesday, Sep 02, 2026 10:50 am »
The Killing of Bernell Trammell
Why the case belongs to the Justice Department now

By Luis Gonzalez
The Last Wire | September 2, 2026



Five years ago, a man was shot dead outside his own storefront in Milwaukee, and the state that owns the crime scene has done nothing with it since. That alone should settle the question of whether Washington belongs in this case. Everything else is detail.

Bernell Trammell ran eXpressions Journal out of Riverwest for decades, and he was, by every account, impossible to file neatly: Black, Rastafarian, a street preacher who supported Donald Trump and Black Lives Matter and a Democratic mayoral candidate in the same breath. In the summer of 2020, with Milwaukee still smoldering from the unrest after George Floyd's killing, Trammell stood outside his shop with a homemade Trump sign. A neighbor later admitted the sight startled her, though she assumed the worst outcome would be an argument. Days before he died, Trammell told a bystander he'd already moved off one corner because people there were, in his words, "just about ready to kill" him. Warned that his sign might draw a thrown rock elsewhere, he said, "No fear. Come what may." On July 23, a man rode up on a bicycle, shot him, and pedaled away.

That is where the case has sat since. Police released surveillance stills of a cyclist. A reward climbed. No arrest followed, and none appears to be coming. Five years is not a slow investigation; it is a closed one that nobody has had the honesty to call closed.

This is where local jurisdiction has failed on its own terms, without any need to import a theory about political assassination. Milwaukee police floated the idea that the killer might have lived in Riverwest, and then that lead, like every other one, went nowhere. A homicide with physical evidence, a suspect description, and a monetary incentive does not stay unsolved for half a decade by accident. It stays unsolved because it stopped being anyone's priority the day the news cycle moved on.

That is precisely the condition federal civil rights investigators exist to address. The FBI's authority to examine potential politically or racially motivated violence, and the Justice Department's authority to review stalled state investigations where a civil rights violation may be in play, were not written for easy cases. They were written for the cases state and local police shelve. Trammell's killing fits that description regardless of what the evidence ultimately shows about motive. A citizen displaying an unpopular sign, warned explicitly that it endangered him, shot dead days later, and the case then abandoned in a drawer, is exactly the fact pattern that justifies a second set of eyes with subpoena power the Milwaukee Police Department either lacks or has declined to use.

Notice what this argument does not require. It does not require certainty that Trammell was killed for his politics. It does not require treating his death as the equivalent of George Floyd's in scale or symbolism, and the comparison between the two is worth exactly one observation: Floyd's killing produced a trial watched by the world, and Trammell's produced a segment on cable news and then quiet. That asymmetry is a fact about which deaths our politics finds useful, not a demand that Trammell's case be elevated to match it. The case for federal involvement rests on something narrower and more defensible: an American citizen is dead, a plausible civil rights motive has never been ruled out, and the agency with jurisdiction over that question has never been asked to look.

There is a version of this story where DOJ investigators reopen the file, run down the bicycle, and conclude the sign had nothing to do with it. That would be a fine outcome. It would close a case that deserves closing, one way or the other, instead of leaving it exactly where it has sat since 2020: unsolved, unexamined, and quietly understood by everyone involved to be going nowhere.

Bernell Trammell was a citizen who said what he thought in a neighborhood that mostly disagreed with him, and he paid for it with his life or he didn't. Nobody has bothered to find out which. The Justice Department should.


— Gonzo

*Luis Gonzalez writes on power, politics, and the systems that quietly shape everyday life.*
“Perhaps we’ll have some answers, at least, before the end. I always dreamed of dying well-informed.” ― Joe Abercrombie, The First Law Trilogy

"The growth of knowledge depends entirely upon disagreement." — Karl Popper

“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place." — Frederic Bastiat

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,572
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Killing of Bernell Trammell
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, Sep 02, 2026 11:25 am »
I'll wager you never imagined that one day in America, a person's life was only as valuable as whether he aligned with the approved political narrative.

Were a Trump aficionado to shoot an unarmed BLM activist: worldwide headlines would result.

Socially-approved vilification of anyone who ever uttered a kind word about Trump would follow.

And unlimited manpower would be brought to bear until the culprit was found, tried and convicted, not as much so that justice might prevail (as it should), as to provide the Institutional Left with yet another bloody shirt to wave.

As they would, endlessly and without a hint of shame.

What happened in this case? We don't yet know. But we will never know unless someone whose sworn duty it is, tries to find out.
"If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people."    -Calvin Coolidge

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,834
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
Re: The Killing of Bernell Trammell
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, Sep 02, 2026 01:14 pm »
I'll wager you never imagined that one day in America, a person's life was only as valuable as whether he aligned with the approved political narrative.

Were a Trump aficionado to shoot an unarmed BLM activist: worldwide headlines would result.

Socially-approved vilification of anyone who ever uttered a kind word about Trump would follow.

And unlimited manpower would be brought to bear until the culprit was found, tried and convicted, not as much so that justice might prevail (as it should), as to provide the Institutional Left with yet another bloody shirt to wave.

As they would, endlessly and without a hint of shame.

What happened in this case? We don't yet know. But we will never know unless someone whose sworn duty it is, tries to find out.

Sad! But true. pointing-up
Scientists, like all discoverers of truth, have always asked, "What?” “How?” “Why?” “What if?” and “Why not?” Questioning science is science.

Jaeger, John . Brilliant Creations : The Wonder of Nature and Life (p. 5). Kindle Edition.