The Briefing Room

General Category => Midterm Elections 2022 => Topic started by: GeneralCarlosQ17 on December 29, 2022, 08:53:35 pm

Title: Fishy Business – Arizona Mandatory Recounts Revealing Significant GOP Gains
Post by: GeneralCarlosQ17 on December 29, 2022, 08:53:35 pm
Fishy Business – Arizona Mandatory Recounts Revealing Significant GOP Gains, Hobbs Sealed Results Until After Her Lawsuit Completed
Oh, now this is just the proverbial cherry on the fishy cake in Arizona.
#elections  #fraud  #arizona  #lawsuits  #politics  
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/12/29/fishy-business-arizona-mandatory-recounts-revealing-significant-gop-gains-hobbs-sealed-results-until-after-her-lawsuit-completed/   
Title: Re: Fishy Business – Arizona Mandatory Recounts Revealing Significant GOP Gains
Post by: Hoodat on December 29, 2022, 09:19:50 pm
Quote
Apparently, in her role as Secretary of State Katie Hobbs filed a motion with the court to seal the final recount result until after the lawsuit filed in Maricopa County against her was concluded.  That means the Lake team did not have the results of three recounts to use in court as evidence that something sketchy in Arizona had taken place.

It appears Mrs. Hobbs intentionally did not want the recount information coming out until her lawsuit to become governor was completed.

The legal term for this is 'obstruction of justice'.
Title: Re: Fishy Business – Arizona Mandatory Recounts Revealing Significant GOP Gains
Post by: GeneralCarlosQ17 on December 30, 2022, 01:44:13 am
The legal term for this is 'obstruction of justice'.

yes it is. these types belong in gitmo
Title: Re: Fishy Business – Arizona Mandatory Recounts Revealing Significant GOP Gains
Post by: Polly Ticks on December 30, 2022, 01:57:06 am
Quote
Apparently, in her role as Secretary of State Katie Hobbs filed a motion with the court to seal the final recount result until after the lawsuit filed in Maricopa County against her was concluded.  That means the Lake team did not have the results of three recounts to use in court as evidence that something sketchy in Arizona had taken place.

It appears Mrs. Hobbs intentionally did not want the recount information coming out until her lawsuit to become governor was completed.

The legal term for this is 'obstruction of justice'.

Presumably Lake can use this info in her appeal, yes?