Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
1
 
Chinese Handcuffs: How China Exploits America’s Climate Agenda
May 6, 2024 
Erin Walsh and Andrew Harding

 SUMMARY
Since the 1970s, China has been waging an effective long-term strategy to transform its energy resource vulnerabilities into a net advantage. China’s growing control of and influence over global energy supply chains is providing it with new sources of leverage. Worse still, the U.S. is actively contributing to China’s dominance over the green energy domain while failing to exploit the challenges China has in this sector. With the energy policy trajectory under the Biden Administration, China is positioned to dominate future energy markets for decades to come. This dominance is not inevitable—but the U.S. must act now to prevent it and to free itself from its self-imposed “Chinese handcuffs.”

KEY TAKEAWAYS
America is one of the world’s three largest energy producers; China is the world’s largest energy importer. Yet, current U.S. policy puts energy security at risk.

Over the past few decades, China has been executing a plan to reverse these roles by dominating the so-called green movement openly embraced by the political Left.

The Biden Administration rejoined the Paris Agreement, jeopardizing U.S. energy security, saddling the U.S. with high financial costs, and giving China a free ride.

https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/chinese-handcuffs-how-china-exploits-americas-climate-agenda
2
Climate Change / The war on food
« Last post by rangerrebew on Today at 11:03:49 am »
The war on food
By
Duggan Flanakin
|
May 15th, 2024
 
Back in February, CBS News reported that food prices had continued to rise faster than the rise in the overall Consumer Price Index. Restaurant prices were increasing at an annual rate of 5.1 percent, while grocery prices were up 1.2 percent. But the real story is that supermarket prices are 25 percent higher now than in January 2020, while inflation had increased by 19 percent.

At the same time, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that “climate and conflict are two leading drivers of [our] global food crisis.” UN climate chief Simon Stiell chimed in that, “Rapid, sustained action to cut greenhouse gas emissions and to increase resilience is needed now to help stop [chronic hunger] from spiraling out of control.”

There are just three things wrong with the UN pronouncements. First, the slight increases in carbon dioxide have left the planet 20 percent greener than it was just 24 years ago – according to NASA. Crop yields have increased by 13 percent over the same period. Deserts are shrinking. This suggests, and science indicates, that decreasing atmospheric carbon dioxide would likely reverse this trend, decreasing the amount of arable land.

https://www.cfact.org/2024/05/15/the-war-on-food/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-war-on-food&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-war-on-food
3
There just might be 74 million reasons environmental charities ignore eagles and whales, and reject zero emission nuclear

By Jo Nova

Renewable billionaires would be crazy if they weren’t funding “Environmental Activists”

Nick Cater points out one mysterious charity, the Sunrise Project Australia had a “revenue” of $73.8 million* dollars last year and we don’t know where that came from.

Let’s say you made a fortune from Big-Government subsidies and rigged market rules — what would stop you pouring some of those parasitic profits right back into fake environmentalists groups to help “your favourite” politicians win? It has the added bonus that when your wind turbines chop up eagles or deafen the dolphins no one says a word. The same sell-out environmental groups would .. do nothing at all. Mum’s the word! Which is exactly what Greenpeace and the WWF seem to do — nothing.

Let’s just say hypothetically, that you ran a company completely dependent on politicians to create rigged market rules — like banning your main competitor? (Nuclear power). What would stop you funneling some of those profits into environmental cover groups to whip up “grassroots” whinges into a fully mature political campaign with digital databases and social media tracking?

And conveniently for them, as Nick Cater points out, the Australian Electoral Commission doesn’t classify […]

https://www.climatedepot.com/2024/05/14/there-just-might-be-74-million-reasons-environmental-charities-ignore-eagles-whales-reject-zero-emission-nuclear/
4
THEY AREN’T EVEN TRYING TO HIDE IT ANYMORE‼️

When they tell you who they are, believe them.

https://redstatenation.com/what-do-you-notice-when-you-mirror-the-image-of-king-charles-portrait-do-you-see-it/
5
Every time I see something like this, I think democrats and rinos can't possibly come with up dumber excuses to blame "global warming" for, they prove their massive creativity for excuses humbles my poor brain. rrthree
6
Gavin Newsom: Climate change a factor in CA budget deficit
California Gov. Gavin Newsom referenced climate change during his explanation for the state's massive budget deficit during a press conference on Friday.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6352866390112
7
There is one reason the framers of the Constitution planned on separation of church and state.  Clergy are not scientists. :nono:
8
Pope Francis Says World At ‘Breaking Point’ From Climate Change. Data Shows That’s False
by Jason Walsh  7 hours ago 

Pope Francis asserted during his introduction to a 3-day climate summit that climate change has brought the world to the “breaking point.” [emphasis, links added]

The pontiff wrote that he has “heartfelt concerns” for “our suffering planet,” adding that “the world in which we live is collapsing” because humanity fails to address the crisis.


The Pope argued that climate change’s impact will increasingly prejudice the lives and families of many people, adding that the effects are already felt in the areas of “healthcare, sources of employment, access to resources, housing, forced migrations, etc.”

The Pontiff said that climate change “is one of the principal challenges facing society and the global community” and its effects “are borne by the most vulnerable people, whether at home or around the world.”

https://climatechangedispatch.com/pope-francis-says-world-at-breaking-point-from-climate-change-data-shows-thats-false/
9
Scientist Or Activist? With Climate Change, It’s Often Hard To Tell The Difference
by I & I Editorial Board  3 hours ago 
 

Last week, Nature magazine allotted space to a researcher who wrote about “​​the importance of distinguishing climate science from climate activism.” [emphasis, links added]

While surprising, it is nonetheless encouraging. It’s well past the time the zealots in white coats were outed for who they were.


Ulf Büntgen, affiliated with multiple universities, wrote that he is “concerned by climate scientists becoming climate activists,” and is also “worried about activists who pretend to be scientists,” because doing so “can be a misleading form of instrumentalization.”

That Nature would allow something bordering on blasphemy in the climate cult to appear in its pages is rather remarkable.

https://climatechangedispatch.com/scientist-or-activist-with-climate-change-its-often-hard-to-tell-the-difference/
10
Totally rational thing for a US Secretary of State to do in a war zone... I'm disappointed Secretary Austin didn't join him on the Sax...
The 21st-century equivalent of Nero fiddling.


https://www.rightjournalism.com/video-as-russian-troops-advance-in-northeast-ukraine-heres-what-secretary-blinken-was-doing-in-a-bar-in-kyiv-and-people-share-their-opinion/

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10