The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => Second Amendment => Topic started by: Elderberry on April 28, 2017, 12:07:15 am
-
Guns.com 4/27/17 | by Daniel Terrill
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz signed on as a co-sponsor to the Hearing Protection Act days before he’s scheduled to speak at the National Rifle Association’s annual convention, where the bill is expected to be a major talking point.
The proposed measure has so far gained 14 co-sponsors, all Republicans, in the U.S. Senate and a related measure in the House has gained 137 co-sponsors, including three Democrats.
This legislative session is the second round for the bill. When it was proposed in the Senate in 2015, it gained only three sponsors. While the Texas senator was not one of them, he is known among gun rights groups for his no-compromise stance on guns, even picking up a presidential endorsement by Gun Owners of America during his campaign.
If passed, the HPA would remove silencers from items listed on the National Firearms Act, which requires buyers to complete legal paperwork and pay a $200 tax before obtaining one. According to the bill’s language, silencers would be regulated like rifles.
Supporters of the measure argue silencers should be treated as a safety device because it reduces the sound of a gunshot and helps to prevent hearing damage.
More: http://www.guns.com/2017/04/27/ted-cruz-signs-on-to-hearing-protection-act/ (http://www.guns.com/2017/04/27/ted-cruz-signs-on-to-hearing-protection-act/)
-
This makes sense, anyway. "Silencers" don't silence the firearm, they suppress the muzzle noise, much as a muffler makes a car or a lawnmower quieter. We require mufflers on vehicles, but ban them on firearms, make them more difficult and expensive to own than they should be. That makes no sense.