The Briefing Room
General Category => Science, Technology and Knowledge => History => Topic started by: Elderberry on October 05, 2019, 10:52:27 pm
-
The Post & Email
(Oct. 5, 2019) — On Saturday morning, The Post & Email received an email from reader Robert Laity, who has filed lawsuits and written extensively about the “natural born Citizen†provision contained in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution relating to presidential eligibility.
He reported that after reading an article on putative 21st President Chester Arthur at the National Constitution Center and attempting to leave a comment in response, he received a message indicating that the comment was considered “spam†and would not be published.
Published October 5 on the anniversary of Arthur’s birth in 1829 or 1830, as his tombstone reportedly states, the article begins, “Arthur was born on October 5, 1829 in Fairfield, Vermont. (In later years there were claims, never proven, that Arthur was born across the border in Canada, which would have threatened his eligibility to serve as President.)â€
More: https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/10/05/national-constitution-center-rejects-comment-about-chester-arthurs-presidential-eligibility/ (https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/10/05/national-constitution-center-rejects-comment-about-chester-arthurs-presidential-eligibility/)
-
Too late to complain about it now, I should think.
-
The Post & Email
(Oct. 5, 2019) — On Saturday morning, The Post & Email received an email from reader Robert Laity, who has filed lawsuits and written extensively about the “natural born Citizen†provision contained in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution relating to presidential eligibility.
Wish I had that much spare time on my hands.....
-
Old post.