The Briefing Room

General Category => Science, Technology and Knowledge => Topic started by: rangerrebew on July 08, 2018, 11:04:38 am

Title: Saving Science
Post by: rangerrebew on July 08, 2018, 11:04:38 am
 
Saving Science
Science isn’t self-correcting, it’s self-destructing. To save the enterprise, scientists must come out of the lab and into the real world.

Daniel Sarewitz

Science, pride of modernity, our one source of objective knowledge, is in deep trouble. Stoked by fifty years of growing public investments, scientists are more productive than ever, pouring out millions of articles in thousands of journals covering an ever-expanding array of fields and phenomena. But much of this supposed knowledge is turning out to be contestable, unreliable, unusable, or flat-out wrong. From metastatic cancer to climate change to growth economics to dietary standards, science that is supposed to yield clarity and solutions is in many instances leading instead to contradiction, controversy, and confusion. Along the way it is also undermining the four-hundred-year-old idea that wise human action can be built on a foundation of independently verifiable truths. Science is trapped in a self-destructive vortex; to escape, it will have to abdicate its protected political status and embrace both its limits and its accountability to the rest of society.

https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/saving-science (https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/saving-science)
Title: Re: Saving Science
Post by: Oceander on July 08, 2018, 11:37:19 am
Sounds like a demand for the politicization of Science. 
Title: Re: Saving Science
Post by: Joe Wooten on July 08, 2018, 12:22:44 pm
Sounds like a demand for the politicization of Science.

Yep.
Title: Re: Saving Science
Post by: Sanguine on July 08, 2018, 05:20:47 pm
I read it as advocating for applied science.