The Briefing Room

General Category => National/Breaking News => Topic started by: flowers on July 15, 2014, 04:11:41 pm

Title: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: flowers on July 15, 2014, 04:11:41 pm

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/wh-weve-substantially-improved-tranquility-global-community

Quote

(CNSNews.com) – White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday the Obama administration’s foreign policies in a number of areas have enhanced the world’s “tranquility” – a word that raised eyebrows as reporters pointed to situations in Gaza, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Ukraine and the South China Sea.

More than one reporter during Monday’s press briefing referred to a front-page Wall Street Journal article highlighting some of those crises, and citing security strategists as saying “the breadth of global instability now unfolding hasn’t been seen since the late 1970s.”

“How does the White House react to the notion that the president is a bystander to all these crises?” asked Fox News’ Ed Henry, citing the widening gaps between the sides in the Iranian nuclear talks, the conflict in and around Gaza, and the Syrian civil war.

“I think that there have been a number of situations in which you’ve seen this administration intervene in a meaningful way, that has substantially furthered American interests and substantially improved the, uh, you know, the – the tranquility of the global community,” Earnest replied.

Title: Re: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: flowers on July 15, 2014, 04:12:07 pm

:banging:

Title: Re: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: musiclady on July 15, 2014, 04:15:12 pm

I wonder how "tranquil" Christians in Iraq, Egypt, China, North Africa, Syria, to mention a few, feel their lives have been?

Title: Re: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: rangerrebew on July 15, 2014, 09:58:35 pm

I believe the person who came up with this has Harry Reid syndrome.

Title: Re: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: Right_in_Virginia on July 15, 2014, 10:23:29 pm

 

Quote

WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’

9999what

This WH really needs to sober up.

Title: Re: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: Fishrrman on July 16, 2014, 12:47:48 am

[[ WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’ ]]

(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/239/b/d/re_imagined_ingsoc_logo_by_blakpik-d6k0n64.png)

Title: Re: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: DCPatriot on July 16, 2014, 12:51:52 am

I swear that I am losing my mind with these sons-a bitches.

Can't even watch the so-called news any longer.

Where the hell are the flag loving, Constitution loving American fighters ?

Hell.....I'd even settle for somebody named Oswald.

Title: Re: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: Chieftain on July 16, 2014, 01:16:25 am

"I'm sure I'll take you with pleasure!" the Queen said. "Two pence a week, and jam every other day."
Alice couldn't help laughing, as she said, "I don't want you to hire me – and I don't care for jam."
"It's very good jam," said the Queen.
"Well, I don't want any to-day, at any rate."
"You couldn't have it if you did want it," the Queen said. "The rule is, jam to-morrow and jam yesterday – but never jam to-day."
"It must come sometimes to 'jam to-day'," Alice objected.
"No, it can't," said the Queen. "It's jam every other day: to-day isn't any other day, you know."
"I don't understand you," said Alice. "It's dreadfully confusing!"

 :smokin:

Title: Re: WH: We've ‘Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’
Post by: kevindavis007 on July 16, 2014, 01:23:04 am

 :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly: