Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
1
Yes, I remember Roy Moore.

I thought it had been proven awhile ago, that Trump did sleep with her???

Obviously not.

A very dear friend of mine left TBR because she was positive Moore was guilty, despite the lack of any evidence. She fought like hell with other members for months. Makes me sad that she would not budge and left us.
2
a few seconds ago
'Very well': Trump responds when asked how trial day is going
By Kyle Schnitzer

When asked by a pool reporter how the trial is going Tuesday, Donald Trump said "very well."

"Mr. Trump, how's it going in there?" a reporter shouted in the hallway.

The former president held his right hand to his mouth, saying, "Very well."
4
Why every person needs to do research from all sides, left, middle and right.  Never believe anything from the far left or far right without doing your own research .  Both sides  mislead and misinform and leave out pertinent information.

If a person only receives their info from the far left or far right they eventually become misinformed.

I watch and read plenty of varying POV's, and still haven't seen that.  What's your source?  du?
5
Why every person needs to do research from all sides, left, middle and right.  Never believe anything from the far left or far right without doing your own research .  Both sides  mislead and misinform and leave out pertinent information.

If a person only receives their info from the far left or far right they eventually become misinformed.

Sounds like you researched that claim. Do you care to share that here?
6
Do you have ANY proof that Trump ever slept with Stormy Daniels (or whatever her real name is) If so ,  I would love to see it.  Do you remember Roy Moore?

Yes, I remember Roy Moore.

I thought it had been proven awhile ago, that Trump did sleep with her???

Obviously not.
7
I'm hoping the City of Grants Pass v. Johnson case ends up overturning or gutting the Boise decision. Boise basically makes it extremely difficult for cities to remove Sacred Homeless who want to live on sidewalks and parks and park trails. It is in force in the Ninth Circuit, but it's a potential precedent against any city in the US. Overturning Boise won't magically create in every city the will to remove Sacred Homeless, but it will free up cities that do want to but have been restrained/constrained by Boise.

 :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
8
:amen: And it's not accidental!

This is somewhat anecdotal, but this was one of the favorite moments of my career.

Our local  state office had brought us in for an enforcement conference around a real vague fugitive emissions infraction that had one set of interpretive analysis that had been understood as the standard for years. 

The agressive enforcement agent started reading the regulation to us with vigor and anger and accused us of intentionally breaking the rule.
However, I had a consultant particpate in the hearing, who countered the opposite.  The agent lashed out and accused him of not knowing what he was talking about.

My consultant responded......  Do you know who wrote this regulation?  Me!!!!  Our consultant was a former head and lead General Counsel of the state's Reguatory Section.   Man did that pencil head's face  turn red.   :silly:
9
15:01
Court is taking a short break

Stormy Daniels cross-examination is paused for short break.
10
I'm hoping the City of Grants Pass v. Johnson case ends up overturning or gutting the Boise decision. Boise basically makes it extremely difficult for cities to remove Sacred Homeless who want to live on sidewalks and parks and park trails. It is in force in the Ninth Circuit, but it's a potential precedent against any city in the US. Overturning Boise won't magically create in every city the will to remove Sacred Homeless, but it will free up cities that do want to but have been restrained/constrained by Boise.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10