Laura Ingraham: 'Never Trump' stands with Clinton and partial birth
By T. Becket Adams (@becketadams) • 10/20/16 1:34 AM
Talk radio host Laura Ingraham claimed Thursday morning that conservatives who refuse to vote for GOP nominee Donald Trump explicitly support abortion.
"They're standing with the woman who stood up there today and said, 'I'm hundred percent for Roe v. Wade and partial birth abortion," Ingraham said in reference to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's performance Wednesday evening at the third and final presidential debate.
"That's what 'Never Trump' stands for, I guess," she said during an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity. "Roe v. Wade and partial birth abortion. Fantastic."
Her remarks came as fellow Trump fan and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee said that every evangelical and Roman Catholic must rally to the GOP nominee's side because of his promise to nominate pro-life justices to the Supreme Court.
Read More At: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/laura-ingraham-never-trump-stands-with-partial-birth/article/2605095
Notice how quickly these liberals attack conservatives?Troll
Laura Ingraham, "Kiss My Grits"!!!! :silly:
Notice how quickly these liberals attack conservatives?
Trump was great the other night when he brought abortion, I applauded...But for you Laura, to insinuate that conservatives who don't vote for your idol agree with abortionist.Back when I listened to conservative talk radio―this was about ten years ago―I came to the conclusion that Laura was a Republican first and a conservative second. It didn't seem to matter what kind of bad idea the GOP came up with, Ingraham was in favor of it (the exception being immigration). She wasn't so much a conservative thinker as she was a partisan parrot, spewing talking points (she even visited the White House for them at one point if I recall right).
My opinion of you Laura was more than you deserved....you my dear are not a conservative.
I know this because I am. My number one issue for years has been abortion. Everyone who knows me knows I am adamant about it.
Never Trumpers feel the same as I and how dare you throw this insult at us hoping that this will make us change our minds, for me it does the opposite...it sickens me that you have lowered yourself to this depth.
I think this election has made it quite obvious that almost every single "conservative" radio talk show host is a party first Republican when it comes down to it.
Another Trumprostitute pipes up.
Notice how quickly these liberals attack conservatives?
Notice how quickly these liberals attack conservatives?
Troll
I think this election has made it quite obvious that almost every single "conservative" radio talk show host is a party first Republican when it comes down to it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftbm8EZZDqI
In reality this election shows they don't want the GOP to win anything period. That is why almost of the talk shows supported Trump.
I don't understand why people like Ingraham don't recognize that every time they say something like that they've burnt another bridge. There are bridges on fire all over the place and they just keep lighting more - and then claim they're trying to win... Incredibly stupid.
Notice how quickly these liberals attack conservatives?True that.
Trump was great the other night when he brought up abortion, I applauded...But for you Laura, to insinuate that conservatives who don't vote for your idol agree with abortionist.
My opinion of you Laura was more than you deserved....you my dear are not a conservative.
I know this because I am. My number one issue for years has been abortion. Everyone who knows me knows I am adamant about it.
Never Trumpers feel the same as I and how dare you throw this insult at us hoping that this will make us change our minds, for me it does the opposite...it sickens me that you have lowered yourself to this depth.
I think this election has made it quite obvious that almost every single "conservative" radio talk show host is a party first Republican when it comes down to it.
Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity should stop. If they don't, the only audience they'll have are their true believers.
Hannity now has the number one show on cable news. Megyn NeverTrump Kelly has the lowest
A Mitt Romney shill like LI has exactly ZERO credibility when bitching at ANYONE regarding the abortion issue.
I don't understand why people like Ingraham don't recognize that every time they say something like that they've burnt another bridge. There are bridges on fire all over the place and they just keep lighting more - and then claim they're trying to win... Incredibly stupid.
You're right Obama was a much better choice to be president. Look at all the wonderful thing O has done to the USA. Things I'm sure Hillary will build on.
Hillary made it quite clear she is all in on abortion, even late term abortion. Trump stood solidly on the side of life.
If your number one issue is abortion who do you want appointing Supreme Court Judges?
Hannity now has the number one show on cable news. Megyn NeverTrump Kelly has the lowest
Trump was great the other night when he brought up abortion, I applauded...But for you Laura, to insinuate that conservatives who don't vote for your idol agree with abortionist.
My opinion of you Laura was more than you deserved....you my dear are not a conservative.
I know this because I am. My number one issue for years has been abortion. Everyone who knows me knows I am adamant about it.
Never Trumpers feel the same as I and how dare you throw this insult at us hoping that this will make us change our minds, for me it does the opposite...it sickens me that you have lowered yourself to this depth.
If you're allowing Trump to come between you and abortion, repudiating Trump is more important than the unborn. Which is fine, I guess, but at least we know where you stand.
If you're allowing Trump to come between you and abortion, repudiating Trump is more important than the unborn. Which is fine, I guess, but at least we know where you stand.
You got that from what @mystery-ak said?
Here I think you might need to study this:
(http://pxhst.co/avaxhome/ab/7b/000e7bab_medium.jpeg)
Hillary made it quite clear she is all in on abortion, even late term abortion. Trump stood solidly on the side of life. If your number one issue is abortion who do you want appointing Supreme Court Judges?
Weak and feckless "conservatives" in Congress take their cues from weak "conservatives" here and elsewhere. Unwilling to stand up for what they believe in and quickly fold to the liberals every time.
You wouldn't know a conservative if you met one.
Weak and feckless "conservatives" in Congress take their cues from weak "conservatives" here and elsewhere. Unwilling to stand up for what they believe in and quickly fold to the liberals every time.
:tongue2: :tongue2: :tongue2:
QuoteNever Trumpers feel the same as I and how dare you throw this insult at us hoping that this will make us change our minds, for me it does the opposite...it sickens me that you have lowered yourself to this depth.
I won't abandon the unborn; because my self-righteousness is so important. Laura is absolutely correct.
If Boehner and McConnell and the rest of the GOP leadership had listened to the type of Conservatives we have on this board and other Conservative political websites...there wouldn't have been a second Obama term, the entire laundry list of things Obama has done that are un/post Constitutional would have never happened and we wouldn't be in the weak position we are on the Global stage.
Instead like your idol...Orange Jesus...they spent more time trying to destroy anyone within their party that wouldn't go along with them.
Does it bother one how merely being for the nominee subjects one to the most uncivil, hostile and basest comments.
Pot Kettle. And crocodile tears.
You Go Girl! Tell "Em Laura!
(http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/fashion/daily/2016/07/21/21-laura-ingraham.w1200.h630.jpg)
They wanna abandon the most innocent, the least of our brothers, that's their problem,
I'm glad someone points that out.
There has never been a more pro-life Republican on the ticket than Mike Pence, never, not with Reagan, Palin nor anyone else and certainly not with Romney.
Trump stood solidly on the side of life.
If your number one issue is abortion who do you want appointing Supreme Court Judges?
Hillary made it quite clear she is all in on abortion, even late term abortion. Trump stood solidly on the side of life. If your number one issue is abortion who do you want appointing Supreme Court Judges?
No, he didn't. New York values, remember?
Ted Cruz.
Notice how quickly these liberals attack conservatives?Yep, I expected more respect from Ingraham.
If you're allowing Trump to come between you and abortion, repudiating Trump is more important than the unborn. Which is fine, I guess, but at least we know where you stand.
Donald Trump told Mark Halperin yesterday that his sister, a federal judge, would be a “phenomenal” Supreme Court justice. He also said that “we will have to rule that out now, at least.”
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/423196/trump-praises-his-sister-pro-abortion-extremist-judge-ramesh-ponnuru
Laura Ingraham: 'Never Trump' stands with Clinton and partial birth
Ingraham is as dense as the fools who claim that as a Never Trumper; Hillary thanks me for my support.
Laura Ingraham: 'Never Trump' stands with Clinton and partial birth
Ingraham is as dense as the fools who claim that as a Never Trumper; Hillary thanks me for my support.
No, he didn't. New York values, remember?
Ted Cruz.
You Go Girl! Tell "Em Laura!
(http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/fashion/daily/2016/07/21/21-laura-ingraham.w1200.h630.jpg)
They wanna abandon the most innocent, the least of our brothers, that's their problem,
I'm glad someone points that out.
At least, she's supporting someone who doesn't put Christians who have been in Iraq since right after Christ died, in the firing line.
Really brilliant.
I hope after this election a lot of talk shows go away, like Laura Ingraham..
I'd ask what the HELL does that mean? What are you talking about. But I see this is just another Tom Sea effort to be meaningful.
FAIL.
@TomSea
Trump supports abortion. Always has. Planned parenthood does many "wonderful things" he says.
Trumps a crappy candidate and a crappy person.
I won't abandon the unborn; because my self-righteousness is so important. Laura is absolutely correct.
If you're allowing Trump to come between you and abortion, repudiating Trump is more important than the unborn. Which is fine, I guess, but at least we know where you stand.
And what has Ted Cruz done for the right to life, not 5% of what Governor Mike Pence has.Nice canard. I voted for the Vice Presidential candidate once. **nononono* Not again.
Remember?
Does it bother one how merely being for the nominee subjects one to the most uncivil, hostile and basest comments.
Pot Kettle. And crocodile tears.
@TomSeaFor you to say that on a thread accusing #Never Trump of being in favor of murdering babies, that's pretty deep. And I mean in the shovel ready sense.
There's a contingent here that loathes Trump and by proxy, his supporters.
It is a sad, all consuming hatred. Look at how quick they have turned on their own. For some people, even ambivalence towards Trump is too much support, worthy of reprimand and scolding. The only reason I continue to post here in spite of all the meanness is I refuse to succumb to it.
@TomSea
There's a contingent here that loathes Trump and by proxy, his supporters.
It is a sad, all consuming hatred. Look at how quick they have turned on their own. For some people, even ambivalence towards Trump is too much support, worthy of reprimand and scolding. The only reason I continue to post here in spite of all the meanness is I refuse to succumb to it.
For you to say that on a thread accusing #Never Trump of being in favor of murdering babies, that's pretty deep. And I mean in the shovel ready sense.
@TomSea
There's a contingent here that loathes Trump and by proxy, his supporters.
It is a sad, all consuming hatred. Look at how quick they have turned on their own. For some people, even ambivalence towards Trump is too much support, worthy of reprimand and scolding. The only reason I continue to post here in spite of all the meanness is I refuse to succumb to it.
Ugly stuff spews from the keyboards of pro-abortion Trump lovers......Well to be fair I don't doubt that their heart is in the right place. @TomSea for instance has done a good job keeping us up to date with new articles on the pro life news on this forum.
@TomSea
There's a contingent here that loathes Trump and by proxy, his supporters.
It is a sad, all consuming hatred. Look at how quick they have turned on their own. For some people, even ambivalence towards Trump is too much support, worthy of reprimand and scolding. The only reason I continue to post here in spite of all the meanness is I refuse to succumb to it.
Well to be fair I don't doubt that their heart is in the right place. @TomSea for instance has done a good job keeping us up to date with new articles on the pro life news on this forum.
But I would like to see some respect that we aren't on the side of abortion either. Just my dos centavos.
@TomSeaI have no use for Trump, am surprised the GOP voters in sufficient number fell for that charlatan, and keep in mind that was less than half of the ballots cast, with an unknown number of Democrat and other crossover votes.
There's a contingent here that loathes Trump and by proxy, his supporters.
It is a sad, all consuming hatred. Look at how quick they have turned on their own. For some people, even ambivalence towards Trump is too much support, worthy of reprimand and scolding. The only reason I continue to post here in spite of all the meanness is I refuse to succumb to it.
Those who profess to be pro life cannot possibly promote tRump. He was for partial birth abortion when he was a NY dem He proclaimed support for Planned Parenthood on one of the first days out as a republican.
Why don't we let Trump explain his views on abortion...
The problem with that is that it assumes that Trump is telling the truth. And since he lies at least half of the time he speaks, one can't rely on anything he says at any time as being truthful.
Now he's running as a "Republican" so he's pretending to be more pro-life than he is. What he said before he was running was more reliable as to what he actually thinks.
And what has Ted Cruz done for the right to life, not 5% of what Governor Mike Pence has.Pence is on the ballot for President? News to me. Unless Trump is elected, alternate reality maybe, and dies, Pence aint nothin but a doorstop in the White House, the V.P. doesn't have spit to do with policy and Trump doesn't listen to anything except maybe the little head between his legs and whats sad is that is the smarter one.
Remember?
Trump made the remarks during a town hall on the "Today" show on NBC on Thursday morning when host Savannah Guthrie asked him about abortion exceptions.
"The Republican platform every four years has a provision that states that the right of the unborn child should not be infringed," Guthrie said. "And it makes no exceptions for rape, for incest, for the life of the mother. Would you want to change the Republican platform to include the (abortion) exceptions that you have?"
"Yes, I would. Yes, I would. Absolutely," Trump said. "For the three exceptions, I would."
Actually it's hard to tell when Trump is lying or truthing when it comes to abortion...
Donald Trump took 5 different positions on abortion in 3 days
But as it turns out — and as it has turned out repeatedly over the course of his life — that was not, in fact, Trump’s final position on the subject. This past week alone, he has held multiple contradicting positions, including that one. So we figured that a timeline was in order, so that you could see the date and time and know, concretely, what Trump’s abortion position was at that moment.
Though he might deny it.
April 1989
Trump co-sponsored a dinner at the Plaza Hotel in Manhattan (which he then owned) honoring Robin Chandler Duke, a former president of NARAL. He chose not to attend, the New York Times reported, after his family was threatened by anti-abortion activists.
more....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/04/03/donald-trumps-ever-shifting-positions-on-abortion/
@TomSeaI don't loath all Trump supporters, only the mindless trumpkins that gobble up every bit of gibberish that he utters as gospel and insult, ridicule and attempt to minimize anyone that won't swear fealty to their Orange Julius. But you are right about one thing I do loath Trump, just as much as I loath Clinton, they both believe they are entitled to do whatever they want.
There's a contingent here that loathes Trump and by proxy, his supporters.
It is a sad, all consuming hatred. Look at how quick they have turned on their own. For some people, even ambivalence towards Trump is too much support, worthy of reprimand and scolding. The only reason I continue to post here in spite of all the meanness is I refuse to succumb to it.
Hannity now has the number one show on cable news. Megyn NeverTrump Kelly has the lowestFirst off, being the number one cable news show is like being the tallest midget. Less than 1% of the American public watches those shows, and even then, it's mostly over 50.
There's a contingent here that loathes Trump and by proxy, his supporters.
Those who profess to be pro life cannot possibly promote tRump. He was for partial birth abortion when he was a NY dem He proclaimed support for Planned Parenthood on one of the first days out as a republican.
If Tom's heart is in the right place, he'll stop lying about those of us for whom the life of the unborn is the highest priority.
There are a lot of people here who do not like Trump but are going to vote for him because they dislike Hillary more.
There is no consuming hatred here...most here feel the need to confront and defend their conservative positions....we would all love to be united behind one conservative candidate but that isn't the case.
Sorry you feel the hatred here as I don't think anyone here wants that to happen.
YOU on the other hand are living vicariously through him. You have a choice to be 'other' and you won't. You parrot every bad thing about Trump as if you always held his beliefs as your own. Even when they invariably change week to week. Thats a whole other level of disgust we have for you.
Look at the post right before yours by @Norm Lenhart for a lovely example.
No, the life of the unborn must necessarily fall somewhere below repudiating Trump on your list of priorities.
People have disgust for you Trump fanatics. Lots of it. You brought it on yourself with your disgusting actions in support of a madman. Thats the reality you created here and in the real world.
If the shoe fits, wear it. If the truth hurts, good.
I'm going to assume you're not as dense as the things you post, and explain it clearly.......
It is precisely BECAUSE my first priority is the life of the unborn that I repudiate pro-abortion Trump.
And accusing people whose priority is the life of the unborn of being pro-abortion because we can't support pro-abortion Trump is the filthiest attack you can level at pro-lifers. (Laura Ingraham had better beg forgiveness from the Almighty God for this lie).
But this depth of smearing is not a surprise, considering how filthy the attacks Trumpists level have always been......
This one may be second only to accusing Ted Cruz' father of killing Kennedy.
It's vile, Axel, and you are vile for making the accusation.
I'm beginning to wonder if some of them even have a conscience left.
The lies are so egregious, it's hard to grasp what's going on in the soul of those leveling these attacks.
When I think about it, they use our morality against us, our Christianity against us, our pro-life passion against us.
It doesn't take a brilliant theologian to figure out where these attacks originate.....
And it's not a good place.
Don't act offended, because you're not. You can dish it out, and I know you can take it.
You repudiate "pro-abortion Trump" which necessarily allows Hillary the baby killer to take the throne. Your cognitive dissonance is impressive.
Been telling you for a while now they are liberals. You'll see it eventually ;)
They are what their actions show they are. No more, no less. Liberals have no conscience. History begins anew every morning for them and they fell, not think, What ever they feel is what is that day. Tomorrow may be different.
No conscience, no principle.
I think that "no conscience, no principle" is far beyond just liberalism. The fact that they're avidly supporting, lying for, cheating for, bullying for Trump is proof positive that they're liberals. No question about that.
But their problem is deeper, and spiritual in nature.
There's something very, very wrong with what they're doing, and their lack of conscience in doing it.
Don't act offended, because you're not. You can dish it out, and I know you can take it.
You repudiate "pro-abortion Trump" which necessarily allows Hillary the baby killer to take the throne. Your cognitive dissonance is impressive.
Hit dog howls. You're howling an awful lot as Trump gets closer to his deserved defeat.
22222frying pan
Move along, Axel. Nothing to see here. No visible hatred anywhere(!).
They just want to share their Coca-Cola with you and teach you how to sing.
No, the life of the unborn must necessarily fall somewhere below repudiating Trump on your list of priorities.
Move along, Axel. Nothing to see here. No visible hatred anywhere(!).
They just want to share their Coca-Cola with you and teach you how to sing.
Thats the very thing that makes them liberals. It's why they choose liberalism. Liberalism allows them to be completely free of any responsibility.
Do as thou will shall be the while of the law.
-Alester Crowley
If the life of the unborn was a priority, then Trump never would have been the nominee.
Look at the post right before yours by @Norm Lenhart for a lovely example.
I respectfully disagree, Norm. Not about liberalism, but about these few trolls who taint this forum.
The lies, the support for depravity, the disregard for the lives of the unborn, the mocking of people with moral standards...... these are signs of a deeper issue than just politics. There's a warped sense of self here.
I know people who are liberal politically, but are still ethical. I know people who are liberal politically who are still kind. I know people who are liberal politically who still treat others with respect.
These people are both liberal and empty. They are arguing that wrong is better than right. That evil is better than good.
As I said before, the source of the lies they're telling isn't difficult to figure out.
No doubt that they are liberals. NO conservative cheerleads for Trump. NONE. But there's far more wrong than that here.
There's an expression, "Perfection is the enemy of the possible",
Senator Ted Cruz co-sponsored the "the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" prohibiting abortions after 20 weeks.
There were some folks even complaining "Well, that means a baby can be aborted in the first 20 weeks";
It's more important to get things done, not be so pure in one's views that nothing can get done.
Those who profess to be pro life cannot possibly promote tRump. He was for partial birth abortion when he was a NY dem He proclaimed support for Planned Parenthood on one of the first days out as a republican.
If Tom's heart is in the right place, he'll stop lying about those of us for whom the life of the unborn is the highest priority.
So according to this logic, Ronald Reagan who signed abortion into California law, could never be considered a Pro-Lifer.
Thanks for playing! **nononono*
Talk about taking things completely out of contest.
Talk about taking things completely out of contest.
I've been pro-life since I found out about in elementary school, Catholic School;
If folks don't want to support a ticket with the most Pro-Life Republican ever on it, Mike Pence, that's your decision. It's not my problem.
Anti-Trumpers need not take cheap shots on others and accuse people of lying.
Does one want a list of pro-life endorsements of Trump,
Operation Rescue, Rick Perry, and on and on it goes.
I hope Mod3 steps in on these personal attacks, I'm not confrontational, so once the insult flag goes up, I won't read anymore of those posts.
I've been pro-life since I found out about in elementary school, Catholic School;
If folks don't want to support a ticket with the most Pro-Life Republican ever on it, Mike Pence, that's your decision. It's not my problem.
......
Does one want a list of pro-life endorsements of Trump,
Operation Rescue, Rick Perry, and on and on it goes.
.....
He HAS to take things out of context to keep perpetuating his lies.
This one is a master at distortion and deceit.
However, he's completely transparent, and therefore fails in all he attempts.
The lies aren't working because people here are too informed and too intelligent to fall for his Trumpian idiocy.
The propagandist Trumpocrats are only too transparent to those of us conservatives that know them for what they are and for what they supposedly stand for. Truth is...they stand for nothing. It's all "negotiable" with them. Their "core values" are like a pile of leaves, easily blown by the wind....the wind being the blowhard Trump. And they, like Trump, have proven themselves to be highly flexible when it comes to ethics and moral stances. As illustrated by how they have championed every flip-flop and every walk-back and betrayal of conservative values that Trump has made.
As for those that will vote for Trump despite his obvious flaws.... Trump and his core group of leftist cohorts have to be laughing themselves silly at how easily duped and fooled people are these days. Give people no choice and they will vote for what they "perceive" as the least damaging candidate. Problem is.... both candidates are of the same ilk....so the perception is skewed and faulty.
This is an historic election. In so many ways. Too bad the history books will be written to portray it other than truthfully.
Perhaps we conservatives should consider creating a time capsule with the real truth hidden for someone to find at a future date. It might, at least, make future generations take pause and consider how fragile their freedom really is....
or was.
Don't act offended, because you're not. You can dish it out, and I know you can take it.
You repudiate "pro-abortion Trump" which necessarily allows Hillary the baby killer to take the throne. Your cognitive dissonance is impressive.
Well said, some dish it out.
What Trump said was in 1999;
Romney has been criticized in the same way, I wonder if the poster could have stooped to vote for Romney? If they could vote for Mitt but not Trump, then, it starts to look like hypocrisy. I voted for Mitt,Palin, Bush, that is being consistent, not inconsistent.McCain
Anyway, it's not my problem, I will be consistent and not a hypocrite. That's their problem.
I think that one Evangelical Preacher said it correctly,
One can vote for the platform these candidates are running on and not the individual.
I'd say that is what I'm voting for.
-----
Again, take the Ted Cruz Lindsay Graham bill prohibiting abortions after 20 weeks, are we going to use some sort of warped logic as some do and say "but that allows abortion in the first 20 weeks", isn't it better to try to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks than have nothing at all.
Good luck to the cheap shot artist accusing me of lying about the right to life.
We can tell Metaxas and Father Pavone this too.
I think that one Evangelical Preacher said it correctly,
One can vote for the platform these candidates are running on and not the individual.
I'd say that is what I'm voting for.
-----
Again, take the Ted Cruz Lindsay Graham bill prohibiting abortions after 20 weeks, are we going to use some sort of warped logic as some do and say "but that allows abortion in the first 20 weeks", isn't it better to try to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks than have nothing at all.
Good luck to the cheap shot artist accusing me of lying about the right to life.
We can tell Metaxas and Father Pavone this too.
If folks don't want to support a ticket with the most Pro-Life Republican ever on it, Mike Pence, that's your decision.
Again, take the Ted Cruz Lindsay Graham bill prohibiting abortions after 20 weeks, are we going to use some sort of warped logic as some do and say "but that allows abortion in the first 20 weeks", isn't it better to try to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks than have nothing at all.
Romney has been criticized in the same way, I wonder if the poster could have stooped to vote for Romney? If they could vote for Mitt but not Trump, then, it starts to look like hypocrisy.
I respectfully disagree, Norm. Not about liberalism, but about these few trolls who taint this forum.
The lies, the support for depravity, the disregard for the lives of the unborn, the mocking of people with moral standards...... these are signs of a deeper issue than just politics. There's a warped sense of self here.
I know people who are liberal politically, but are still ethical. I know people who are liberal politically who are still kind. I know people who are liberal politically who still treat others with respect.
These people are both liberal and empty. They are arguing that wrong is better than right. That evil is better than good.
As I said before, the source of the lies they're telling isn't difficult to figure out.
No doubt that they are liberals. NO conservative cheerleads for Trump. NONE. But there's far more wrong than that here.
Your posts are always welcomed humor. Please keep em coming 888high58888
I'll bet you thought that post was about you, didn't you?
But I have to disagree with your reaction here.
There's nothing humorous about sin......yours, or anyone else's. That's where you go wrong, Axel.
You find evil enjoyable.......
You were clearly referencing myself and others who support Trump.
I will pray for you.
You were clearly referencing myself and others who support Trump.
I will pray for you.
To Donald or the devil?
Strange comment for someone defending sin, isn't it?
He's projecting, thats all. In this case, the illusion he's something he's not.
Diane Ladd was the original Flo.
(https://weminoredinfilm.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/alice-doesnt-live-here-anymore_diane-ladd_1974.jpg)
I do not see how these talk radio fools can ever regain their credibility
I do not see how these talk radio fools can ever regain their credibility
I defended Mitt's record in '12, I got to learn it well.
http://www.massresistance.org/romney/ <--- So read up on that.
So, if one defended Mitt; which could be done and there is no real reason to do it again, this is gravy now because Trump has never actually enacted legislation. What he said was in 1999.
Again, we are out of the primaries, where Trump was never my choice candidate as in 2012, I was for Santorum not Romney. My record is pretty clear, I never voted for Trump in the daily polls at FR, I voted for Cruz usually and I broke and voted for Kasich 1 time as well as Carson, maybe more than once.
Point being, if one could vote for Romney just say based on the pro-life issue, Trump has less baggage on that one issue.
Because their audience are sheep.
3000 abortion clinics, or 1800, what ever the number, it's a lot, have been close since 1992;
MS and MO have but one clinic in the whole state.
I'd suggest one get informed on what the pro-life organizations have done.
Laura Ingraham likewise is a reknown Pro-Lifer, maybe a convert to Catholicism, so if one wants to attack people with long records of being pro-life, that's not my problem.Okie dokie. I will. How in the world can anyone pro-llife support that man? What over rode your respect for those babies enough to get you to support him? Enquiring minds want to know?
Trump has many pro-life supporters, insult them all if that is what it takes.
I do not see how these talk radio fools can ever regain their credibilityIt is very simple, NeverTrumpers are helping elect the biggest supporter of "woman health" ever. She will pack the courts judges that are pro choice. Trump on the other hand is pro-life. And is on record as saying he will appoint pro-life judges. So now tell me who has the credibility problem.
It is very simple, NeverTrumpers are helping elect the biggest supporter of "woman health" ever. She will pack the courts judges that are pro choice.You act as if you are entitled to our votes, and our not bowing down is the cause of Hillary Clinton winning. The reality is that choosing a reality show star was the real reason Hillary even stood a chance. Even Ted Cruz, as polarizing as he is with an increasingly liberal America, could have put up a more credible fight, but you went with the reality show star with a history of lies, misogyny, and general incompetence that was known well before he even got into the race (that's the important part here, because this was never an invention of the Hillary camp). Trump was never going to win. We tried to tell you this.
Trump on the other hand is pro-life. And is on record as saying he will appoint pro-life judges.Words are cheap. His record is nonexistent. When he wasn't running for office, he was pro-choice.
So now tell me who has the credibility problem.Nope, just the Russian stooge.
You act as if you are entitled to our votes, and our not bowing down is the cause of Hillary Clinton winning. The reality is that choosing a reality show star was the real reason Hillary even stood a chance. Even Ted Cruz, as polarizing as he is with an increasingly liberal America, could have put up a more credible fight, but you went with the reality show star with a history of lies, misogyny, and general incompetence that was known well before he even got into the race (that's the important part here, because this was never an invention of the Hillary camp). Trump was never going to win. We tried to tell you this. Words are cheap. His record is nonexistent. When he wasn't running for office, he was pro-choice. Nope, just the Russian stooge.
Let me know when your my way or the highway approach to politics produces a winner.
You do realize don't you that should Hillary win you will be one of the most hated political group in the USA. The democrats are simply using you as useful idiots and will throw you under the bus in a NY second once Hillary is elected. Republicans on the other hand will remember who elected Hillary (NeverTrumpers) and will hate you for it. Don't believe me? Go have a look at the facebook pages of prominent NeverTrumpers.
You're going to have to start your own little political party, how about the NeverAmericaAgain party. Since electing Hillary means the end of America as we know it.
:hands: :hands: :hands: :hands: :hands:
Sparky, you fundamentally don't understand the dynamic in play here. You should go forth, stand in our field of fornication, and see that it is barren. We don;t CARE if a bunch of leftist Trumpers/leftist Democrats (a distinction without a difference) 'hate us'.
Not. One. Bit.
And yea, forming a better party or adopting one is called 'working toward a solution'. We already have shown the power to deny you and yours your liberals like Romney when we actually stand behind our rhetoric. We are about to show you that power again in a couple weeks. We can't yet front a candidate that can win. But we can, are and will deny YOU the ability to elect liberals.
Eventually people are gonna either get on board with US, or they can get used to Democrats winning every election. Because we have had enough of your way. They might get mad at us. We don't care. We arent electing liberals. So there's your options.
Don't like it? Good. The bottom line is principle. You can get some and stand with us, or 'Enjoy your liberals' without us. YOU do not have a choice.
Let me know when your my way or the highway approach to politics produces a winner.Here, let me call you a Waaahmbulance 8888crybaby
You do realize don't you that should Hillary win you will be one of the most hated political group in the USA. The democrats are simply using you as useful idiots and will throw you under the bus in a NY second once Hillary is elected. Republicans on the other hand will remember who elected Hillary (NeverTrumpers) and will hate you for it. Don't believe me? Go have a look at the facebook pages of prominent NeverTrumpers.
You're going to have to start your own little political party, how about the NeverAmericaAgain party. Since electing Hillary means the end of America as we know it.
Here, let me call you a Waaahmbulance 8888crybaby
***ambulance
It's great being off the GOP plantation. I am bloody sick and tired of the contempt the GOP has shown for Conservative voters, election after election, EXPECTING us to vote for whatever they throw at the glass because we have no place else to go, flogging people into line with the threat of what life will be like with the alternative. Even the Democrats get their votes the old fashioned way--they buy them with tax dollars. You think you can threaten us into voting for your candidate? Think again, peaches, that dog won't hunt.
Well, we do have some place to go. I'd take the highway over your way, but I honestly believe I have found a better Party. You want my vote, EARN it, but as a political Party, YOU'RE FIRED. buh bye
Keep in mind that those who won't be ashamed of their vote for Mr. Trump are a small minority in America. :nometalk:
As for the alternative, don't blame us. Should Hillary win, the ones who hobbled the GOP with that charlatan will be the ones who get the blame, not the people who tried repeatedly to warn you fools that he was unelectable. :chairbang: I'll vote to give the GOP the Congress, and from there, if that big Clinton horror show ISN'T going to happen, it will be because the Congress asserted its Constitutional Authority and STOPPED it (for a change). Maybe they'll actually fight over something besides which group can put us farther in the hole the fastest and strip away more of our Rights than the other. :politics:
Otherwise, the Republicans rats can own the mess they aided and abetted the Democrats in making.
****slapping
Let me know when your my way or the highway approach to politics produces a winner.
You do realize don't you that should Hillary win you will be one of the most hated political group in the USA. The democrats are simply using you as useful idiots and will throw you under the bus in a NY second once Hillary is elected. Republicans on the other hand will remember who elected Hillary (NeverTrumpers) and will hate you for it. Don't believe me? Go have a look at the facebook pages of prominent NeverTrumpers.
You're going to have to start your own little political party, how about the NeverAmericaAgain party. Since electing Hillary means the end of America as we know it.
Don't like it? Good. The bottom line is principle. You can get some and stand with us, or 'Enjoy your liberals' without us. YOU do not have a choice.
as a political Party, YOU'RE FIRED.
It is very simple, NeverTrumpers are helping elect the biggest supporter of "woman health" ever. She will pack the courts judges that are pro choice. Trump on the other hand is pro-life. And is on record as saying he will appoint pro-life judges. So now tell me who has the credibility problem.
Let me know when your my way or the highway approach to politics produces a winner.
Only a certified moronic idiot would believe Trump is pro-life.
I guess in Trump world his coercing mistresses to get abortions doesn't make him pro choice.
I'll bet you thought that post was about you, didn't you?I can't help but hear that in Carly Simon's voice. :laugh:
Back when I listened to conservative talk radio―this was about ten years ago―I came to the conclusion that Laura was a Republican first and a conservative second. It didn't seem to matter what kind of bad idea the GOP came up with, Ingraham was in favor of it (the exception being immigration). She wasn't so much a conservative thinker as she was a partisan parrot, spewing talking points (she even visited the White House for them at one point if I recall right).
I can't help but hear that in Carly Simon's voice. :laugh:
I don't either.Conservatism, true Conservatism, (not 'being Republican automatically makes you a conservative conservatism') requires principles.
I think most of them will fall in line with the new populist party that will be promoted by the new Trump news network that will be created after Trump loses the election. They will scream and yell and the Pubs will be a minority party in the near future, especially after they sign off on immigration reform with border control in name only.
Conservatism is in decline. It doesn't mean it's wrong, it's not. It's in decline because in order for it to thrive and grow it requires an educated population that believes in individual liberty, property rights and consequences for decisions that are made. We no longer have any of these qualities in abundance in this country. Talk radio use to be a source for serious intellectual discussion and like everything else has devolved into an emotion driven belief system. So it's no surprise when someone rejects the newly appointed political savior that emotional response is that person, or persons, supports evil incarnate. In this case the evil incarnate is hillary.
Where were these "high minded" talk radio folks when the nominee was being selected. Other than Levin, I don't remember any of them pointing out what a disaster it would be to nominate someone with no moral foundation and an inability to control himself when he's goaded by his opponent.