Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
1
Netanyahu is correct. I have been watching this with ever increasing amounts of alarm.

Yes it is very alarming.  Perhaps a test run for things to come by the subversive group(s) that have been uprising.

BTW, welcome @artifactsofmars to The Briefing Room.   0005a
2
Trump WAS elected on his campaign and promise of securing the border and building the wall.  He FAILED.  The majority of the wall that was erected under him was mostly repairing existing wall that was built years ago.

Are you seriously trying to compare this built in 2006:



With this:????




Quote
Next.

I'm not sure what you're looking for with "next" @libertybele  ---- But, I'm kinda hoping ""next" includes you stop telling folks how worried you are about illegal immigration because you're posts strongly suggest you don't understand the history of the battle or your concern is disingenuous.

3
A shocking new poll revealed that over 40 percent of Americans believe their country could be torn apart by another civil war within the next five years.

Rasmussen Reports conducted a national telephone and online survey, which revealed 41 per cent of likely US voters think a second civil war is on the horizon, with 16 per cent saying one in the next five years would be very likely.

On the other hand, 49 per cent of participants did not believe a civil war in the next five years is likely to occur, and 20 per cent responded not likely at all.

It also showed that this is a partisan issue, with 37 per cent of voters agreeing that a civil war is more likely to happen if Joe Biden is re-elected this year.

By comparison, 25 per cent saw the conflict being more likely under Donald Trump, and 30 per cent said it would not make much difference who the president is.


https://www.the-express.com/news/us-news/136485/america-civil-war-five-years-poll
4
Netanyahu is correct. I have been watching this with ever increasing amounts of alarm.

Many of us wondered how the "Final Solution" in 1930's Germany took root.

Imagine how it would have been if there was a "Facebook" and other social media back then.

Welcome to TBR!  @artifactsofmars  :beer:
5
We're awash with cockroaches. Will this fact coupled with the damage done by the Dems/Biden administration in the past 3 years end up being our undoing? Stay tuned.
6
I posted Biden would step down at the DNC convention to be replaced with a moderate Bill Clinton 2 0 string on crime and illegal immigration and was attacked as a troll

Biden is getting exponentially worse each month. Guy can barely walk 10 steps

The person who replaced him will be out of the blue.  If Trump is still in he will not know what hit him
 Maybe moderate dem gov  Laura Kelly from Kansas
75% of Dems do not want biden

Well, I wasn't one that attacked you...so moving forward .....if Joe steps down now or replaced at the convention Harris would still be in the picture, so what they are going to do with her, I'm not sure of.  Harris as president for a short time, and then her VP would move into her slot.  Harris is a liability.  I believe she's already been told her days are numbered.

Look for someone like Holder, Jarret, Michelle, maybe even Newsome.....

I believe the DEMS' plan has been in the works for quite awhile and they are just waiting for the right opportunity to make their move.

I agree; Trump is going to be blindsided.
7
I don't know about the "Conservative" angle, but voter turnout was 40.5%.

Wow!  Pretty low turnout.

An great example of "You get the government you deserve!"
8
Can't help but wonder how many Londoners failed to partake because the candidate chosen to oppose Khan wasn't sufficiently "Conservative" in their eyes.

:bolt:

I don't know about the "Conservative" angle, but voter turnout was 40.5%.
9
Don't you find it interesting how Biden is able to divert DoD money to support DEI and other LBGTQ+WXYZ bull crap, but Trump wasn't able to do so with a real life protect-America project of building a wall?  The part about not being given the money is no excuse.  Trump was able to spend $8 trillion that we didn't have during his term.  He could have found a hundred different ways to fund that wall.  He just simply didn't do it.  Because maybe that might have upset Democrats.

Well, he kinda/sorta did.  Remember the "emergency" DoD funding he used to build the parts of the Wall that did get built?  He just waited too long to get started because of that stupid "Mexico will pay for it" pledge.
10


Thanks @Elderberry . The article offers some clarification.

It's not the use of the device but the sale of service using the device. The article does state that it is legal for a rancher to use a sonogram on owned livestock or by a paid employee . So I think it's a pretty fine line between paid employee and hiring a company. It will be interesting to see how this turns out.

FWIW...I still think these guys stepped on somebody's toes. The lack of bail is worrisome.


There was no sentencing hearing and no option for bail.

“The state of Pennsylvania had a judge sign an order of imprisonment for two people without ever naming them as parties to a case, without them being charged with any crime, without any hearing before an order of imprisonment was issued, all of which is completely illegal under Pennsylvania law and the United States Constitution.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10