The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => Topic started by: rangerrebew on March 16, 2019, 03:53:27 pm
-
March 16, 2019
Michigan's Big Brother Attorney General Will Crack Down Hard on Free Speech
By T.R. Clancy
"Know this: we are watching."
Who makes this kind of threat? Reinhard Heydrich, the notorious SS general and chief of the Gestapo? KGB head Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov? Big Brother?
They all talked that way. Last Friday, it was Michigan Department of Civil Rights director Agustin Arbulu's turn to say it. He and Dana Nessel, the new state attorney general, announced plans "to increase the documentation and prosecution of hate crimes and incidents" in the state.
Not just hate crimes. Hate incidents.
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/michigans_big_brother_attorney_general_will_crack_down_hard_on_free_speech.html#ixzz5iLnhlmIO (https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/michigans_big_brother_attorney_general_will_crack_down_hard_on_free_speech.html#ixzz5iLnhlmIO)
-
42 U.S. Code § 1983. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
http://www.constitution.org/brief/forsythe_42-1983.htm (http://www.constitution.org/brief/forsythe_42-1983.htm)
They tread on some really thin ice when it comes to First Amendment Rights.
Disagreement is not "hate" but the hatred of disagreement can manifest itself that way.
-
This needs to be challenged in the courts
-
This needs to be challenged in the courts
Eventually it will be. Why else would the rats still have RBG propped up in the corner?
-
Nessel is a member of the Democratic party. She is the first openly gay person elected to statewide office in Michigan.
Gee, who would've thought? *****rollingeyes*****