🚨 Fresno County, CA: In January, 5 men were arrested for either Rape or Acting in Concert with Another to Commit Rape.

They were booked over a 5 hour period and 4 have the same last name.

They all have immigration detainers.

I will try to find more about this incident.


https://twitter.com/ImmigrantCrimes/status/1787112352917184806

Thanks, Pookie.

You're welcome, as always, Polly Ticks!

ICE Arrests Illegal Alien Released by Connecticut Officials Despite Manslaughter Conviction
Border Hawk
May 6, 2024
 
ICE Arrests Illegal Alien Released by Connecticut Officials Despite Manslaughter Conviction
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Federal authorities arrested an illegal alien convicted of first-degree manslaughter who was released by officials in Connecticut despite an immigration detainer filed against the him.

On Thursday, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced the apprehension of a 35-year-old Guatemalan national in Somers, Connecticut.

The Guatemalan illegally entered the United States at an unknown location in 2007.

In 2013, he was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree and sentenced to 17 years in prison.

That same year, Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) officers “encountered the Guatemalan national at the MacDougall Correctional Institute in Suffield and filed an immigration detainer for his custody with the Connecticut Department of Corrections,” ICE explained in a press release.

https://borderhawk.blog/ice-arrests-illegal-alien-released-by-connecticut-officials-despite-manslaughter-conviction/

Why You Should Care that Kansas Is Attempting to Intervene in Ninth Circuit Border Case
Section 212(f) is a powerful tool — but only if the courts allow the president to use it
 
By Andrew R. Arthur on May 7, 2024
On March 7, five states — led by Kansas Attorney General (AG) Kris Kobach — filed a motion to intervene in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden, a case currently pending on appeal in the Ninth Circuit. You should care how that request plays out, because it could possibly either reinforce or spell doom for a future president’s use of the authority under section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) — which is similar to but broader than Title 42 — to secure the border against illegal migrants.

Section 212(f), in Brief. Section 212(f) of the INA provides, in pertinent part, that:

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

To put section 212(f) into context, the preceding section 212(a) of the INA contains the grounds of inadmissibility, reflecting Congress’ determinations as to which aliens should be admitted to the United States and on what terms, and which aliens should be barred from admission.

Section 212(f) trumps all of them, at least when it comes to admissibility. Basically, in section 212(a) of the INA, Congress says that certain aliens may be admitted to the United States, but then allows the president to say none of them are.

How broad is the authority in section 212(f)? As the Supreme Court explained in its landmark 2018 decision in Trump v. Hawaii (assessing the legality of executive branch travel restrictions for given aliens from certain countries, which were premised on that provision):

https://cis.org/Arthur/Why-You-Should-Care-Kansas-Attempting-Intervene-Ninth-Circuit-Border-Case

Relevant info starts at 5:37:50 mark.

Summary?