The Briefing Room

General Category => Sports/Entertainment/MSM/Social Media => Shooting Sports => Topic started by: To-Whose-Benefit? on July 25, 2017, 08:37:01 pm

Title: Court Rules That Concealed Carry Is Permissible On Streets Of DC
Post by: To-Whose-Benefit? on July 25, 2017, 08:37:01 pm
dailycaller
Kevin Daley
Supreme Court Reporter
12:12 PM 07/25/2017

[excerpt]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/25/court-rules-that-concealed-carry-is-permissible-on-streets-of-dc/

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit entered an injunction Tuesday against a Washington D.C. law limiting the right to carry firearms outside the home, concluding that it may violate the Second Amendment.

The ruling is at odds with other federal courts that have generally limited the right to gun possession outside the home.

The law is third gun control regulation promulgated by the D.C. Council that has struggled in the courts. In its latest iteration, the D.C. law strictly proscribed the circumstances under which concealed-carry licenses may be issued. The court concluded these provisions may be unconstitutional.
 
Title: Re: Court Rules That Concealed Carry Is Permissible On Streets Of DC
Post by: thackney on July 26, 2017, 12:06:41 pm
Quote
The Washington law provides that a concealed-carry permit may only be issued if an individual shows a “good reason to fear injury” or demonstrates a need to carry firearms for work.

Can you imagine this requirement being placed on any part of the first amendment?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You must show a "good reason" to be allowed to buy a permit to use your right outside of your home?
Title: Appeals court blocks enforcement of District’s strict concealed-carry law
Post by: txradioguy on July 26, 2017, 04:38:37 pm
A federal appeals court on Tuesday blocked the District from enforcing strict limits on carrying concealed firearms in public, restrictions that police officials have said are necessary to promote public safety in the nation’s capital.

In a 2-to-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the District’s system, which requires a “good reason” to obtain a permit, is akin to an outright ban in violation of the Second Amendment.

“The good-reason law is necessarily a total ban on most D.C. residents’ right to carry a gun in the face of ordinary self-defense needs,” wrote Judge Thomas B. Griffith, who was joined by Judge Stephen F. Williams.

“Bans on the ability of most citizens to exercise an enumerated right would have to flunk any judicial test.”

The court’s rejection of the District’s permitting system is the latest legal blow for city officials who have been forced to rewrite gun-control regulations ever since the Supreme Court in 2008 used a D.C. case to declare a Second Amendment right to gun ownership. The ruling follows proposals from Republican members of Congress that would require the District to honor concealed-carry permits from other states in the wake of a June shooting at a GOP congressional baseball practice.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/appeals-court-blocks-enforcement-of-districts-strict-concealed-carry-law/2017/07/25/29bcbdfc-7146-11e7-9eac-d56bd5568db8_story.html?utm_term=.bac734349ea1
Title: Re: Appeals court blocks enforcement of District’s strict concealed-carry law
Post by: Free Vulcan on July 26, 2017, 05:21:16 pm
Nice win for the 2nd amendment.
Title: Re: Appeals court blocks enforcement of District’s strict concealed-carry law
Post by: txradioguy on July 26, 2017, 05:23:39 pm
Nice win for the 2nd amendment.

Always refreshing to see the Constitution being applied as it was written in the Nation's Capitol LOL!
Title: Re: Court Rules That Concealed Carry Is Permissible On Streets Of DC
Post by: txradioguy on July 26, 2017, 08:07:10 pm
Can you imagine this requirement being placed on any part of the first amendment?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You must show a "good reason" to be allowed to buy a permit to use your right outside of your home?

Libs try to place limitations on the 1st all the time to keep you and I from exercising our rights granted by it.
Title: Re: Court Rules That Concealed Carry Is Permissible On Streets Of DC
Post by: To-Whose-Benefit? on July 26, 2017, 08:44:09 pm
Libs try to place limitations on the 1st all the time to keep you and I from exercising our rights granted by it.

Indeed Sir!

The FCC Is Just Another Dishonest, Authoritarian Arm of the Obama Administration

April 18 2016, Seton Motley

http://www.redstate.com/setonmotley/2016/04/18/fcc-just-another-dishonest-authoritarian-arm-obama-administration/