The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => Topic started by: 17 Oaks on March 31, 2016, 01:08:00 am
-
Coming soon to a city near you. And of course the number 1 target (even more so than Israel) is the US. While PRIME targets would be Wall Street/NYC and Wash DC, this could be a building to tall to leap…unless our govt is completely numb and stupid they already know this can be reality far sooner than most will think. So nuke on Wall Street or Penn Ave could be a bridge to far at THIS time. Nukes are not a dime a dozen. So where would they pop the cork if its not in those 2 cities?
For ease and simplicity then pick a harbor city, you can go big from Ca to Va-NY. Prime could be Norfolk where we have SEAL Team 6 and some really BIG aircraft carriers located or head up the Potomac River and you have the Pentagon, Miami is cruise ships and lots of people.
While there can be an argument for a strategic site like Norfolk etc the reality is this. The last and only nuke was in Japan and at this time in the world, a nuke popped on a empty wheat field in Kansas would have near the same global effect as one on Wall Street.
That said lets up hope and pray it does not happen between now and ObuttBoy leaving the WH. If it does, the man who kisses the worlds ass will along with Lurch (J Kerry) do what they must to raise their arms with white flags in both hands and offer to pay them more $billions to not do it again, initiate Sharia Law across the US immediately if not sooner and make all Americas bow to the East 5 times a day.
Hopefully we will have a man in the WH who will come on TV before the mushroom cloud sinks to the ground and tell the America people and the people of the world, 3 words: “Game over man”. Then tell us I have just promoted someone to General of our Military, someone who thinks with both sides of his brain, General Georgie Patton on one side and John Duke Wayne on the other side and I gave him a specific order: Call me when the 'fat lady sings’. He told me me he was going to go thru the ME like Krap thru a goose and grease the wheels of our Army with bodies of ragheads just like Patton did in Germany.
A Nuclear-Armed ISIS? It’s Not That Farfetched, Expert SaysMARCH 29, 2016BY PATRICK TUCKER
A Harvard researcher says the terror group might be closer to wreaking some sort of radioactive havoc than we think
[size=78%]The murder of a security guard at a Belgian nuclear facility just two days after the Brussels attacks, coupled with evidence that Islamic State operatives had been watching researchers there, has re-ignited fears about ISIS and nuclear terrorism. Some experts, including ones cited by the [/size][size=78%]New York Timesand others, dismiss the possibility that ISIS could make even a crude nuclear bomb. But Matthew Bunn, the co-principal investigator at the Project on Managing the Atom at Harvard’s Belfer Center, says that the threat is quite real.[/size][/font]
[/b]
Belgium has seen numerous suspicious events related to nuclear material and facilities. In August 2014, a worker at the Doel-4 nuclear power reactor opened a valve and drained a turbine of lubricant. The valve wasn’t near any nuclear material, but the act caused at least $100 million in damage and perhaps twice that. Later, Belgian authorities discovered that a man named Ilyass Boughalab had left his job at Doel-4 to join the Islamic State in Syria. (His last background check was 2009.)
In November, shortly after the Paris attacks, Belgian authorities arrested a man named Mohammed Bakkali and discovered that he had video surveillance footage of an expert at Belgian’s SCK-CEN nuclear research facility in Mol. It now seems that the footage was collected by Ibrahim and Khalid el-Bakraoui, two of the suicide bombers in the recent Brussels attacks.
Dirty Bombs
But beefing up security at explicitly nuclear sites still leaves a lot of radioactive material less well protected. “Radiological materials are available in many locations where they would be much easier to steal, in hospitals, industrial sites, and more,” than at the SCK-CEN center, Bunn wrote Such materials can allow a terrorist to turn a regular-size blast into a catastrophe that renders an entire area essentially poisonous, greatly increasing the costs of cleanup and the long-term danger to survivors, first responders, etc. In 1987, four people died in the Brazilian city of Goiânia from exposure to cesium salt, derived from junked medical equipment.
Bunn points to a recent report from the Nuclear Threat Initiative, which notes that the material to make a dirty bomb exists in “tens of thousands of radiological sources located in more than 100 countries around the world.”
In 2013 and 2014, there were 325 incidents of radioactive materials being lost, stolen, or in some way unregulated or uncontrolled, according to the report, which cites estimates from the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation.
One material of particular concern is Cesium-137, or Cs-137. Abyproduct of fission that’s commonly used in radiation cancer therapy,“it exists in many places much less well protected than SCK-CEN,” Bunn writes.
The ultimate nightmare takes the form of a nuclear bomb composed of highly enriched uranium. Bunn wrote that stealing highly enriched uranium from SCK-CEN would have been very difficult for the Brussels suicide bombers. And yet, he wrote, “The Times story largely dismissed – wrongly, in my view – the idea that the HEU at SCK-CEN might have been the terrorists’ ultimate objective, saying that the idea that terrorists could get such material and make a crude nuclear bomb ‘seems far-fetched to many experts.’”
Citing a recent Belfer Center report, he wrote, “repeated government studies, in the United States and elsewhere, have concluded that this is not far-fetched.”
One key passage in the report offered this insight, that according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, 13 incidents of the “illegal possession, sale, or movement” of highly enriched uranium occurred between 1993-2014. None of those involved material over a kilogram, not nearly enough to build a nuclear bomb. But “Incidents involving attempts to sell nuclear or other radioactive material indicate that there is a perceived demand for such material. The number of successful transactions is not known and therefore it is difficult to accurately characterize an ‘illicit nuclear market.’”
It’s hard to tell how successful an assault on a facility like SCK-CEN would be if attempted by two lone gunmen, even if they had kidnapped an expert. But ISIS’s attraction to nuclear material, and perhaps even a nuclear bomb, seems to be growing.
http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2016/03/nuclear-armed-isis-its-not-farfetched-expert-say/127039/?oref=d-river (http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2016/03/nuclear-armed-isis-its-not-farfetched-expert-say/127039/?oref=d-river)