The Briefing Room
General Category => Health/Education => Topic started by: rangerrebew on November 11, 2018, 01:29:54 pm
-
Patient who died during robot surgery had 99% chance of living if human operated
Stephen Pettitt, 69, died following a "catalogue of errors" and lead surgeon Sukumaran Nair had not been trained enough to use the robot
ByHayley Coyle
04:22, 9 NOV 2018Updated22:09, 9 NOV 2018
A heart patient who died after a robot performed complicated surgery said the man would have had a “99 per cent†chance of survival if a human had operated.
The doctor leading the surgery on Stephen Pettitt, who died after a "catalogue of errors: was not trained enough to use the robot and had only practised using it on a simulator, an inquest heard.
In February 2015, the father-of-three, 69, was the first person in the UK to undergo robotic mitral valve surgery.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/patient-who-died-during-robot-13560373 (https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/patient-who-died-during-robot-13560373)
-
It wasn't the robot.
It was "operator error".
-
It wasn't the robot.
It was "operator error".
Correct. The robot isn't doing it's own thing, like a robot repeating the same move over and over on a manufacturing line. The surgeon is controlling it.
-
A heart patient who died after a robot performed complicated surgery said the man would have had a “99 per cent†chance of survival if a human had operated.
Seriously? WTF? The heart patient, who died, commented on his own chances of survival?
-
Hope the robot is insured for malpractice.
-
Garbage In, Garbage Out
-
I had 20% of one kidney removed via robotic surgery. It would have taken far longer to recover if it had been done the traditional way.