Kamala Harris Accepts Vice-Presidential Candidate Debate Offer from CBS

Olivia Rondeau 16 May 2024

Vice President Kamala Harris has agreed to take part in a VP candidate debate hosted by CBS News this summer, the Biden-Harris campaign confirmed Thursday.

The dates offered by CBS are July 23 or August 13, Harris’s team said.

“The Biden-Harris campaign has informed CBS News that we accept the network’s invitation to participate in a Vice Presidential debate, in studio, on either of two dates,” the campaign said in a statement obtained by ABC News.

The campaign agreed to the debate under the following guidelines: “It would not have an in-person audience, that there be firm time limits for answers, alternate turns to speak and candidate’s microphone should only be on when it is their turn to speak.”

“We look forward to the Trump campaign accepting one of these dates so that the full debate calendar for this campaign can be set,” the Biden-Harris campaign said.

Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump has yet to select a running mate. The presumptive Republican presidential nominee has already agreed to two debates before the general election — one with CNN on June 27 and one with ABC News on September 10.

Trump has previously said he’s putting off picking a vice-presidential candidate until closer to the Republican National Convention (RNC) in mid-July.

“Well, I’m not in a rush and we’ll do it sometime around the convention, but we have a lot of great people in the Republican Party,” the Republican said in an April interview with 6ABC.

https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/05/16/kamala-harris-accepts-vice-presidential-candidate-debate-offer-from-cbs/

Mr. Trump isn't taking my calls at the moment, but if he did I would advise him that accepting the offer before knowing "the rules" laid down by the leftists was a mistake, and to use them as an excuse to back out "for cause" while he still can.

An absolute requirement would be that any debate be held in front of a live audience, to prevent "editing" later on. Or perhaps even editing "in-progress".

CNN should be a no-go from the get-go.

And an equal number of moderators, half picked by the left and the other half by Mr. Trump. If only one moderator, the two sides submit 5 names each and the winner be drawn from a hat.

Better yet, NO debates at all.

I won't be watching in any case, but I see this as being only detrimental to Mr. Trump's chances, with no "gains" to be made -- unless ol' white joe suffers a complete breakdown at the podium...

My hunch is that it won't be a live debate, but pre-recorded and then televised with 'enhancements' and 'deletions' made to help Brandon.

Why did we hear not too long ago that their net worth was well above $10 million? Now it's under $2.6 million? The Chinese, Ukrainians and God knows who have been funneling gobs of money to this criminal for many years - so where is it?

I'm not buying it.

Somewhere offshore possibly.

Supreme Court rules in favor of CFPB, brainchild of Sen. Elizabeth Warren

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the funding mechanism that feeds the Obama-era agency Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is constitutional.

In a 7-2 decision, authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court held that Congress uniquely authorized the bureau to draw its funding directly from the Federal Reserve System, therefore allowing it to bypass the usual funding mechanisms laid out in the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution.

"For most federal agencies, Congress provides funding on an annual basis. This annual process forces them to regularly implore Congress to fund their operations for the next year. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is different. The Bureau does not have to petition for funds each year. Instead, Congress authorized the Bureau to draw from the Federal Reserve System the amount its Director deems ‘reasonably necessary to carry out’ the Bureau’s duties, subject only to an inflation-adjusted cap," Thomas wrote.

"In this case, we must decide the narrow question whether this funding mechanism complies with the Appropriations Clause. We hold that it does," the opinion states. ..................

.................Justice Samuel Alito dissented from the decision, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, saying, "The Court upholds a novel statutory scheme under which the powerful [CFPB] may bankroll its own agenda without any congressional control or oversight."...............

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-favor-cfpb-brainchild-sen-elizabeth-warren

Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
Devin Archer turned over "3.7 million documents never before been seen by any of the IRS investigators, the securities & exchange investigators."

These documents will "answer pretty much every question we've had about the source of these shady transactions" and Biden's role.

"We believe we've found new accounts"

"The evidence is overwhelming that Joe Biden was involved... Joe Biden was a central figure."

"If you were paying the Biden Family for the Biden Brand you were buying Joe Biden."
Post
Conversation
FoiaFan🇮🇱 reposted
Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
Devin Archer turned over "3.7 million documents never before been seen by any of the IRS investigators, the securities & exchange investigators."

These documents will "answer pretty much every question we've had about the source of these shady transactions" and Biden's role.

"We believe we've found new accounts"

"The evidence is overwhelming that Joe Biden was involved... Joe Biden was a central figure."

5:07 PM · May 16, 2024

New bank accounts of the Biden family have been found which were used for receiving money being laundered from China, Romania, & Russia while Biden was VP, with over $240K in checks being directly wired to Biden with no explanation.

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1791131198078456059