The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => SCOTUS News => Topic started by: Elderberry on March 12, 2024, 12:30:56 am
-
WND 3/11/2024
Smallpox-era precedent ignores modern legal analysis of requirements
A court precedent allowing governments to order populations to take shots is being challenged because it comes from a smallpox era from which medicine has advanced greatly, and it was abused during COVID-19.
The New Civil Liberties Alliance said it has petitioned the Supreme Court on behalf of clients Jeanna Norris, Kraig Ehm and D'Ann Rohrer over Michigan State University's "unlawful and unscientific COVID-19 vaccine mandate."
Two clients were fired by the school, even though they "had naturally acquired immunity to COVID," for refusing to take the experimental shots that the school had ordered them to accept.
Multiple studies now have documented the dangerous, even fatal, side effects from many of those shot programs that were developed – and sold to the government – during the pandemic.
"By conditioning their public employment on receiving unnecessary medical treatment, MSU violated their constitutional right to refuse medical intervention and ignored their statutory right to informed consent," the legal team said.
More: https://www.wnd.com/2024/03/shot-mandate-dating-back-1905-gets-constitutional-challenge/ (https://www.wnd.com/2024/03/shot-mandate-dating-back-1905-gets-constitutional-challenge/)