Author Topic: Report: How Radical Environmental Special Interests Manipulate the Federal Judiciary  (Read 179 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 194,185
  • Gender: Male
Report: How Radical Environmental Special Interests Manipulate the Federal Judiciary
September 30, 2026
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the House Judiciary Committee released an interim staff report titled, "How Radical Environmental Special Interests Manipulate the Federal Judiciary." The report reveals how the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), a left-wing environmental activist group that pushes for greater regulation of American industries, and its Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) target judges whom they believe may be likely to hear disputes surrounding climate change with one-sided judicial training seminars intended to influence the outcome of litigation. This targeted influence campaign undermines the American tradition of unbiased neutrality by predisposing federal and state judges in favor of plaintiffs bringing novel lawsuits against American energy producers.

Since August 2025, the Committee and its Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet have been conducting oversight of ELI's attempts to bias federal judges through its judicial "educational" programs. To date, the Committee and Subcommittee have received and reviewed more than 15,000 pages of documents and compelled day-long testimony from key players in ELI's initiative.

The Committee's and Subcommittee's oversight has highlighted the scope of radical environmentalists' efforts to indoctrinate and bias judges, including:

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/report-how-radical-environmental-special-interests-manipulate-federal
“Our government teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” Louis D. Brandeis

“A people who choose spectacle over skill will dance to the rhythm of their own extinction.” Pierre Lagrenat

Online rangerrebew

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 194,185
  • Gender: Male
I don't think they have to manipulate too hard with most liberal judges. **nononono*
“Our government teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” Louis D. Brandeis

“A people who choose spectacle over skill will dance to the rhythm of their own extinction.” Pierre Lagrenat

Online DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,262
  • Gender: Male
Does the Heritage Foundation have a rebuttal?  They're the ones that pick Trump's judge nominations.
"Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it’s entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - Alan Simpson, Frontline Video Interview

Online Smokin Joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 69,230
  • I was a "conspiracy theorist". Now I'm just right.
Back when the SPLC was guiding Federal Agencies about "hate groups and domestic terrorism", we got to see similar 'guidance'.

Bias seeped in the cracks, but most of it waked through the front door, with a casual nod to security.
How God must weep at humans' folly! Stand fast! God knows what he is doing!
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

C S Lewis