Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
1
Watch: Sen. John Kennedy on Fire, Torches Climate Professor - 'You Gonna Call Me a Sick F***?'

 By Allison Anton
  May 1, 2024 at 2:14pm

While too many senators on the right haven’t been willing to call out radical wokeness, the obnoxiousness with which these activists have their defended their alarmist claims might have just pushed some senators over the edge.

Or, at least one, Republican Senator for Louisiana John Kennedy.

During a hearing on Wednesday regarding certain environmental topics, titled “Denial, Disinformation, and Doublespeak: Big Oil’s Evolving Efforts to Avoid Accountability for Climate Change,” Sen. Kennedy went toe-to-toe with professor Geoffrey Supran on the groups he publicly supports on social media.

And, as seen in a clip of the hearing shared to the social media platform X, the questioning got quite heated.

https://www.westernjournal.com/watch-sen-john-kennedy-fire-torches-climate-professor-gonna-call-sick-f/
2
Really disappointed that Schlichter fell for the "puppy" line.
3

Trending Politics
By Chris Powell
May 1, 2024

Former President Donald Trump stands as the first former president in U.S. history to be criminally tried, but the prosecutors’ case in Manhattan has some legal analysts concerned about its prospects. The case, led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, hinges on charges that Trump falsified business records relating to alleged hush money paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign.

As the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee, Trump’s trial has been a crucible of public opinion, with significant implications for both his political future and issues of accountability in office. Legal analyst Rebecca Roiphe called attention to a critical challenge faced by Bragg’s prosecution: the complexity of the case may confuse jurors, potentially obscuring the central issues at stake.

In a New York Times opinion piece, Roiphe warned that while the details of financial transactions and corporate law might be legally pertinent, they can easily become bewildering for a jury not versed in the nuances of business law. The potential confusion could undermine the prosecution’s efforts to present a clear, compelling narrative of wrongdoing.

(more)
https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/legal-analyst-warns-alvin-bragg-of-huge-mistake-in-trump-trial-mace/
4
Seattle coffee shop workers call 911 when homeless man causes disturbance; no officers arrive
Video shows assault on Seattle cafe employees; police do not respond to inquiry
Pilar Arias By Pilar Arias Fox News
Published April 30, 2024 2:37pm EDT
 

A homeless man in Seattle was caught on camera causing a disturbance in an ice cream and coffee shop, and the small business's owner says police officers were not dispatched when his workers called 911.

The incident took place around 7 p.m. April 24 in the Pike Place Market area near Seattle's famous Gum Wall, according to Baxter & Frost owner Ian Halcott. Security camera footage shows a man wearing a beanie and hoodie with his hands in his front pockets talking to an employee before shoving things off a counter display, making a mess in the establishment.

A second clip shows the man pushing a movable display case at two workers, prompting one to pull a knife to defend himself and his coworker while the other grabbed a spatula and baking tray. The workers continued arguing with the man, before he left and a Pike Place Market security guard showed up.


"This video includes an assault on one of my employees as well as the destruction of my service counter by a deranged criminal," Halcott told radio host Jason Rantz in an email.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/seattle-coffee-shop-workers-call-911-when-homeless-man-causes-disturbance-no-officers-arrive
5


Davidson also claimed that the $130,000 that Daniels received to buy her silence about the alleged one-night-stand "wasn’t a payoff, and it wasn’t hush money."

He prefers to describe the arrangement as a "consideration," he testified.

Quote of the trial thus far.....    :silly:
6
Sounds like Andy Biggs got it right. He usually does.
7
Horseshit. Back in the first week of December last year Johnson said the border was "the hill to die on". He flat out lied and HE is the one that betrayed this country.

Okay, so let's talk about what Johnson did on the border.

Johnson clearly was engaged in hard bargaining/brinksmanship with Senate Democrats, trying to get them to act on the border legislation, HB 2, that the House had passed last July.   The leverage Johnson was trying to use was refusing to pass any other aid unless Senate Democrats also agreed to that border security bill.

The problem turned out to be that the Democrats were willing to let aid to both Ukraine and Israel die rather than past that border bill.   And that shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody, because the vast majority of the Democratic party would go apeshit if the Senate passed that border bill, and Biden signed it.

In other words, the border bill was not going to pass no matter what Republicans did, and there was nothing Republicans could do to change that.  It's unfortunately what happens when you have such a small majority in the House, and the other party controls both the Senate and the Presidency. You simply can't push through major controversial legislation against a hostile Senate and President.  That has never happened.

So that was the reality with which Johnson was faced this spring - that the Republican priority of a border bill was not going to happen.  That became even more certain when President Trump himself came out and said that the Republicans should not agree to any border bill unless it provided 100% security. Obviously, Trump said that because he didn't want to lose the issue for the November election. In any case, Trump's own statement killed whatever chance there was for even a compromise border bill.

So at that point, Johnson's threat not to pass any other aid without a border bill had failed. If you want to call that some unbreakable "promise", fine, but I think it was pretty clearly a negotiating tactic by Johnson.  He tried a poker bluff, it failed, and the Democrats simply had the much better hand. It happens.

So once Johnson accepted the reality that the border bill was not going to pass, the merits of the other legislation had to be considered on their own. And that's exactly what he did.

So there were only two choices:

1) have no border bill, and pass aid to Ukraine and Israel, or

2) have no border bill, and no aid to Ukraine or Israel either.

At that point, the border is irrelevant.  So you either support aid to Ukraine and/or Israel, or you don't. And it's pretty clear that MTG was perfectly happy with Ukraine getting absolutely no military aid whatsoever, regardless of whether  a border bill was being passed or not. 

She should be honest enough to admit that she doesn't want Ukraine getting any military aid regardless, and quit hiding behind the border as an excuse.
8
Trump’s VP Pick Should Be Someone Who Has Never Admitted to Shooting a Puppy
Kurt Schlichter


The speculation over Donald Trump’s veep pick is heating up, and his potential choices’ respective pole positions have changed a lot since the last time I wrote about this. Now, I’ve been pretty clear that there were three main criteria for picking a running mate. One, the appointment cannot hurt the GOP, like by putting a seat at risk. Two, the nominee must be competent to be president. Three, the pick must bring something to the table as far as winning the election. And I guess I now have to add a fourth qualification. The nominee can’t have shot any puppies.

Now, I wouldn’t think that I would have to tell anybody that shooting puppies is a bad idea if you want to be elected by the American people. Americans like puppies. They don’t like people who shoot puppies. So, the thought process of anybody who wants to be liked by the American people admitting to shooting puppies escapes me.

Yet, Kristi Noem capped Cricket the dog and then wrote about it in her book. Besides being bizarre and cruel, this was politically insane. It’s totally disqualifying, and apparently Donald Trump agrees because rumor has it that she’s off his shortlist. Somewhere across the rainbow bridge, Cricket is wagging her tail as she watches Noem’s political future dragged to the gravel pit and given the Joe Pesci in “Goodfellas” treatment.

more
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2024/05/02/trumps-vp-pick-should-be-someone-who-has-never-admitted-shooting-a-puppy-n2638470
9
Is he considered a repeat offender or were all the charges dismissed because of the effect of global warming on him? *****rollingeyes*****
10
there is no way that bumbling fool Biden got that many votes. They cheated and then tried to stop you from pointing out that they cheated. But they cheated.

And it'll be a lot more difficult for them to cheat this time but they'll try. That and bitching on end is what the left excels in.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10