The Briefing Room

General Category => Military/Defense News => Topic started by: mystery-ak on April 07, 2013, 01:15:37 pm

Title: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: mystery-ak on April 07, 2013, 01:15:37 pm
http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/blogs/rolling-out_714625.html (http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/blogs/rolling-out_714625.html)

Rolling Out
Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Geoffrey Norman
April 6, 2013 3:32 PM

Since the Shermans of General Patton's Third Army crossed the Rhine on March 22, 1945, there have been American tanks in Germany.  No more, as John Vandiver of Stars and Stripes reports.

Quote
    The U.S. Army’s 69-year history of basing main battle tanks on German soil quietly ended last month when 22 Abrams tanks, a main feature of armored combat units throughout the Cold War, embarked for the U.S.

    The departure of the last M-1 Abrams tanks coincides with the inactivation of two of the Army’s Germany-based heavy brigades. Last year, the 170th Infantry out of Baumholder disbanded. And the 172nd Separate Infantry Brigade at Grafenwöhr is in the process of doing the same.

     On March 18, the remaining tanks were loaded up at the 21st Theater Sustainment Command’s railhead in Kaiserslautern where they then made the journey to the shipping port in Bremerhaven, Germany. There they boarded a ship bound for South Carolina.

Good that they were there, all these years.  Better that they are no longer needed.
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: PzLdr on April 07, 2013, 08:00:23 pm
http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/blogs/rolling-out_714625.html (http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/blogs/rolling-out_714625.html)

Rolling Out
Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Geoffrey Norman
April 6, 2013 3:32 PM

Since the Shermans of General Patton's Third Army crossed the Rhine on March 22, 1945, there have been American tanks in Germany.  No more, as John Vandiver of Stars and Stripes reports.

Good that they were there, all these years.  Better that they are no longer needed.

They may still be needed. They're just not going to be there. Seems like the 20 watt bulb in the WH hasn't been paying attention to the Russian military buildup  :whistle:. And Europe couldn't even handle Serbia by itself.  :smokin:
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: Atomic Cow on April 07, 2013, 08:03:45 pm
The only thing which kept the Soviets out of Western Europe was the fact that they knew we'd deploy tactical nuclear weapons against their armored columns.

The whole purpose of our armored divisions was to simply delay the Soviets long enough (a few hours to a day at best) so we could deploy our nukes against them.
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: truth_seeker on April 07, 2013, 09:42:33 pm
How did it work winning in Iraq and Afghanistan, from the air?

Ten+ years later, and still uncertain of the future.
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: PzLdr on April 07, 2013, 11:09:07 pm
How did it work winning in Iraq and Afghanistan, from the air?

Ten+ years later, and still uncertain of the future.

Absolutely. And we've got a CinC who feels about nukes the same way a vampire feels about garlic pizza. And who takes longer to make a decision than the Colorado River took to carve the Grand Canyon. This is NOT a good move.  :patriot:
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: Ford289HiPo on April 08, 2013, 01:47:14 am


The whole purpose of our armored divisions was to simply delay the Soviets long enough (a few hours to a day at best) so we could deploy our nukes against them.

Soviet planners estimated it would take them 5 days from the onset of hostilities to reach Gibraltar.
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: Atomic Cow on April 08, 2013, 02:01:33 am
Soviet planners estimated it would take them 5 days from the onset of hostilities to reach Gibraltar.

The Soviet's were always a little optimistic in their estimates, even back in WWII when fighting the Germans.  They assumed NATO wouldn't risk nuclear escalation.

However, NATO would use SADMs to destroy bridges, tunnels, and mountain passes, leaving the Soviets with few routes for their tanks and causing traffic jams 20 miles long.
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: Ford289HiPo on April 09, 2013, 01:56:08 am
The Soviet's were always a little optimistic in their estimates, even back in WWII when fighting the Germans.  They assumed NATO wouldn't risk nuclear escalation.

However, NATO would use SADMs to destroy bridges, tunnels, and mountain passes, leaving the Soviets with few routes for their tanks and causing traffic jams 20 miles long.

Traffic jams, yes. The autobahns would have become the worlds largest parking lot. As for routes, the Soviets weren't actually dumb enough to plan on a main axis of attack through the Fulda Gap. That was our idea. A much better route would have been through the less defended, less restricted north across the Lueneberger Heide and then swing south.
We had the SADM's, and they were pulled out in the early 80's and the Green Light teams were disbanded.
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: truth_seeker on April 09, 2013, 02:15:30 am
Run by me again?

Who won the Cold War?

Glass half empty, versus glass half full.

I'm sure the Soviets had "plans" to win.

But we had plans to win too, and did.

I remember riding with my boss, back from annual marksmanship qualification at a range near Heidelberg. He said if fighting broke out, he'd send his wife in their private car, in the direction of France. He too had the story that the troops and equipment there, were a temporary holding force.

I guess it supports Reagan's strategy of peace through force. Make the other guy not want to be destroyed.
Title: Re: Rolling Out: Last Army tank leaves Germany.
Post by: Ford289HiPo on April 10, 2013, 03:12:40 am
Run by me again?

Who won the Cold War?

Glass half empty, versus glass half full.

I'm sure the Soviets had "plans" to win.

But we had plans to win too, and did.

I remember riding with my boss, back from annual marksmanship qualification at a range near Heidelberg. He said if fighting broke out, he'd send his wife in their private car, in the direction of France. He too had the story that the troops and equipment there, were a temporary holding force.

I guess it supports Reagan's strategy of peace through force. Make the other guy not want to be destroyed.

I would say that we were lucky.

Remember the book "The Third World War, August 1985"; by General Sir John Hackett?

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1375759.The_Third_World_War_August_1985 (http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1375759.The_Third_World_War_August_1985)

I was in the Border Cav (2 ACR) in West Germany at that time, and this work of fiction was taken as reality by our own side. We had 3x the amount of troops on our border camps, all prepared for the beginning of a war that was forecast in a work of fiction. Our General Defense Plan was to deploy 3 km inside Czechoslovakia prior to imminent hostilities.

As far as your bosses plan.......it would have failed. She would have never made it, and the equipment storage sites were not only painfully underequipped and had obsolete equipment, but they were big targets. 

Yeah, we spent the Soviets into oblivion, and Star Wars never came to fruition. We may not be so lucky the next time.