The Briefing Room
General Category => Elections 2020 => Topic started by: mystery-ak on November 18, 2020, 01:03:16 am
-
HUGE! Elections Security Expert Finds Wisconsin Results a COMPLETE FRAUD — Current Machines Do Not Have Capability to Count the Mass Dumps for Biden in Reported Time Period (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Published November 17, 2020 at 6:31pm
(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/russ-ramsland-wisconsin.jpg)
Russ Ramsland, of the Allied Security Operations Group, joined Lou Dobbs on Tuesday night to discuss the Wisconsin presidential election.
Ramsland confirmed the vote was fraudulent and he has proof!
The election was stolen!
Russ Ramsland: We have been out looking mostly at Michigan. We are beginning on turning our sights on Pennsylvania and Georgia. The things you find in Michigan are amazing. There are over 3,000 precincts where the presidential votes cast compared to the estimated voters from the SOS (Secretary of State) is 99% all the way up to 350%. Those kind of numbers don’t exist in the real world. So where did all those votes come from? And looking at that, we’ve gone back and looked at some of these huge vote dumps that were mostly Biden’s. We call them spikes. We’ve gone back and traced the spikes. We’ve seen where they were cast, primarily in four counties. We looked at how long it took to cast those votes. And we looked at the equipment that exists at all of those locations by serial number. And the fact of the matter is we can’t see any physical way possible for some of those votes to have been in those kind of numbers because they just don’t have the equipment that can produce it in that timing.
more
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-elections-security-expert-finds-wisconsin-results-complete-fraud-current-machines-not-capability-count-mass-dumps-biden-reported-time-period-video/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-elections-security-expert-finds-wisconsin-results-complete-fraud-current-machines-not-capability-count-mass-dumps-biden-reported-time-period-video/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons)
-
You mean to tell me that one voting machine can't handle 6,000 voters casting votes in a 3 minute period?
-
I wonder if SCOTUS will be moved by this overwhelming preponderance of evidence.
-
The Guinness Book of World Records should be notified.
-
Oh, that's a very neat argument.
-
:bkmk:
-
Oh, that's a very neat argument.
I really hope you are being serious.
-
I really hope you are being serious.
Why wouldn't I be being serious?
-
Never mind. I should not have suspected sarcasm from you. My mistake.
-
skeeter wrote:
"I wonder if SCOTUS will be moved by this overwhelming preponderance of evidence."
Even if they were... what kind of "judicial relief" can they order?
-
skeeter wrote:
"I wonder if SCOTUS will be moved by this overwhelming preponderance of evidence."
Even if they were... what kind of "judicial relief" can they order?
after what happened in Michigan today I'm beginning to think it is possible more counties will refuse to certify results.
-
Never mind. I should not have suspected sarcasm from you. My mistake.
:silly: Alright. I guess I deserved that. :beer:
But yes, I was being serious.
-
Oh, that's a very neat argument.
----------------------------
Roamer, a reflection.
The paranoia on parade has reached crescendo levels for some;
requiring medical attention!!!
-
----------------------------
Roamer, a reflection.
The paranoia on parade has reached crescendo levels for some;
requiring medical attention!!!
I am a step off of that @Absalom ... But I surely see it. To read through these threads you would think that every precinct everywhere is full of cheating Democrats, which is probably part of what offends @Victoria33 so much. By and large I think that our elections and their officials and workers try hard to uphold the standard one would expect.
But I am willing to entertain claims of malfeasance - Even massive fraud - But as one might suppose, proof is required. I think there will always be some cheating. That is unavoidable.
This particular instance is more along the lines of what I would expect as endemic - A small precinct overtaken by partisans, who try to shovel truckloads of fraudulent ballots through... That they did their work so very well winds up being their undoing, when the number of ballots they supposedly processed out-does their literal and mechanical means.
They have certainly cheated an order of magnitude above their capacity to process... And that is a hard argument to deny. That brings a chuckle... Maybe even a chortle... When they get hoisted upon their own petard. As they damn well should.
-
...To read through these threads you would think that every precinct everywhere is full of cheating Democrats,...
Nope! Just a few precincts in Philly, Pittsburg, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Detroit, Chicago, and Las Vegas. But there is likely a lot in other places as well.
-
You mean to tell me that one voting machine can't handle 6,000 voters casting votes in a 3 minute period?
I wonder what the average time is to mark a ballot? Depending on the Propositions,etc, if I read through them, more than three minutes.
-
Oh, that's a very neat argument.
It really is. And it should be a fairly simple thing to prove.
-
I think there will always be some cheating. That is unavoidable.
The primary reason for that is because cheating is never punished. In the risk-reward equation, risk is non-existent. And most posters here are really pissed off about it.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease, and this time around the wheel is a bit louder than usual. It will be nearly impossible to overturn the perennial fraud in Wayne County. Sure, they had more votes logged there than they have eligible voters. But that is true every election. But looking at the neighboring suburban counties, it is clear that Wayne-County-style ballot stuffing has been introduced.
-
It really is. And it should be a fairly simple thing to prove.
Nonsense. Just because 6,000 consecutive voters were able to cast votes for Joe Biden in a 3 min period on one voting machine without a single vote for Trump being cast, that doesn't prove anything.
-
Nonsense. Just because 6,000 consecutive voters were able to cast votes for Joe Biden in a 3 min period without a single vote for Trump being cast, that doesn't prove anything.
And I'm sure it happens all the time.
-
Election headlines that start with "HUGE!" are usually the exact opposite IMO.
-
Election headlines that start with "HUGE!" are usually the exact opposite IMO.
I generally would agree with you @Weird Tolkienish Figure but not in this particular case.
-
Wisconsin Refuses to Initiate Statewide Recount Unless Trump Campaign Hands Over $7.9 Million
By Ryan Ledendecker
Published November 18, 2020 at 5:49am
Among countless other litigation-related decisions surrounding the outcome of the 2020 election, President Donald Trump is now forced to weigh whether or not he’s willing to spend vast amounts of money for official recounts in states that he lost by narrow margins to former Vice President Joe Biden.
According to the Daily Wire, one of those states is Wisconsin, where Trump lost to Biden by a narrow six-tenths of a point. Because of the thin margins, Trump is entitled to request an official state recount, but only if he’s willing to shell out a whopping $7.9 million to cover the costs of such a herculean effort.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission broke the news to the president this week, informing him that recounts are provided free of charge if the margin between winning and losing falls at 0.25 percent or less. Anything higher than that margin requires the person requesting the recount to fork out the money to cover it.
Adding to the president’s decision is the fact that the WEC informed Trump and his legal team that they only have until close of business this Wednesday to order the recount. If Trump’s team moves forward with it, the state would be forced to act quickly and finish the recount by December 1.
more
https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/wisconsin-refuses-initiate-statewide-recount-unless-trump-campaign-hands-7-9-million
-
"It will be nearly impossible to overturn the perennial fraud in Wayne County. Sure, they had more votes logged there than they have eligible voters. But that is true every election. But looking at the neighboring suburban counties, it is clear that Wayne-County-style ballot stuffing has been introduced."
@roamer_1
@Hoodat
@Cyber Liberty
Guys, TV this morning, Wednesday, says Wayne County has certified their results.
-
@roamer_1
@Hoodat
Guys, TV this morning, Wednesday, says Wayne County has certified their results.
Yes, they did it last night. I believe somebody has a Zoom video where somebody threatened the County Recorder's children. But, that's OK because we've had a whole summer of approved rioters beating the Shineola out of people. We're supposed to be used to violent lawbreakers.
-
@roamer_1
@Hoodat
Guys, TV this morning, Wednesday, says Wayne County has certified their results.
@Victoria33
Certified or not, it does not change the FACT that there were more ballots cast in Wayne County than there are people eligible to vote. Care to explain that one?
-
@Victoria33
Certified or not, it does not change the FACT that there were more ballots cast in Wayne County than there are people eligible to vote. Care to explain that one?
@Hoodat
IF what you say is true, it could happen if that state allows same day voter registration on election day. Other than that, I do not know.
-
Some cannot see the fire for all the damned smoke!
-
Some cannot see the fire for all the damned smoke!
It is willful. It isn't a matter of not being able to see. It is a matter of consciously refusing to look.
-
Some cannot see the fire for all the damned smoke!
And "some".... due to their hatred of Trump.... only see what they want to see.
-
@Victoria33
Certified or not, it does not change the FACT that there were more ballots cast in Wayne County than there are people eligible to vote. Care to explain that one?
This happens in every election that Democrats win. Has been happening for decades.
And the Republicans always ignore it. Once the election is over, all is forgotten.
Republicans haven't done a single solitary thing to stop Democrat fraud for decades.
The feeling I get from the Republican Congress all of them, for years and years is:
"I won. So screw everyone coming behind me. I got mine and that is enough!"
I guess once they get in, they just want to duck and hide and not to rock the boat.
-
It is willful. It isn't a matter of not being able to see. It is a matter of consciously refusing to look.
:yowsa: :amen:
-
@roamer_1
@Hoodat
@Cyber Liberty
Guys, TV this morning, Wednesday, says Wayne County has certified their results.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Wrong! At first they voted against because there were far more VOTES than PEOPLE (Sad!). Then they were threatened, screamed at and viciously harassed, and were FORCED to change their vote, but then REFUSED, as American patriots, to sign the documents. 71% MESS. Don’t Harass!
8:55 AM · Nov 18, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1329060562442067969
-
To set the record straight, my claim was incorrect. It isn't that there were more votes received, it's that there are more registered voters in Wayne County than there are people eligible to vote. My mistake.
I discovered the error shortly after posting it, but decided to leave it up just to see what @Victoria33 's response would be. She did not disappoint.
For each and every piece of evidence introduced indicating any election discrepancy or indication of fraud will either be explained away with some absurd scenario or completely ignored outright.
-
It really is. And it should be a fairly simple thing to prove.
Not anymore.... They certified anyway.
-
Not anymore.... They certified anyway.
The way I understand/read it... they conditioned that certification with a required audit. Then and only then would they sign off on the certification.
Does anyone here know exactly which scenario is the correct one?
-
Not anymore.... They certified anyway.
Doesn't the legislature have the authority to over turn the certification, if there is evidence of fraud.
-
This happens in every election that Democrats win. Has been happening for decades.
And the Republicans always ignore it. Once the election is over, all is forgotten.
Republicans haven't done a single solitary thing to stop Democrat fraud for decades.
The feeling I get from the Republican Congress all of them, for years and years is:
"I won. So screw everyone coming behind me. I got mine and that is enough!"
I guess once they get in, they just want to duck and hide and not to rock the boat.
Its just flat cowardice. Republicans are afraid of having the race card pulled on them if they raise any concerns. A good example is what happened during the Wayne County Board of Canvassers' Zoom call last night - those who initially refused to certify were called - wait for it - racists.
-
The primary reason for that is because cheating is never punished. In the risk-reward equation, risk is non-existent. And most posters here are really pissed off about it.
Well no... That may be, and in fact I believe it to be true... But even as honorable as feasibly possible, you will always find those that will push against the edges... It is the nature of some. Heck, it's MY nature. It's why I can do what I do... Some will ALWAYS try to hack the system.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease, and this time around the wheel is a bit louder than usual. It will be nearly impossible to overturn the perennial fraud in Wayne County. Sure, they had more votes logged there than they have eligible voters. But that is true every election. But looking at the neighboring suburban counties, it is clear that Wayne-County-style ballot stuffing has been introduced.
Well it is now neither here nor there, unless the court stops the cert... Which is highly unlikely. Its proofs no longer verifiable, and its purpose no longer actionable. Nearly spilt milk at this time.
-
Not anymore.... They certified anyway.
Nope. The two R members have not signed the certification. They've requested a full audit.
-
Election headlines that start with "HUGE!" are usually the exact opposite IMO.
LOL! That's probably the most verifiable fact on this whole thread.
888high58888
-
@Hoodat
IF what you say is true, it could happen if that state allows same day voter registration on election day. Other than that, I do not know.
No, the point being that they have no feasible way to process that many votes in the time frame in question. The quantity of votes far outstrips their ability to process them... That is a very good proof and a question that should be answered, albeit that it has been rendered moot.
-
The way I understand/read it... they conditioned that certification with a required audit. Then and only then would they sign off on the certification.
Does anyone here know exactly which scenario is the correct one?
Something like that... but it is literally kicking the can. If you think the fat cat politicos up the chain are more likely to enforce an audit than the boots on the ground, you've another think coming. Dollars to donuts, nothing will come of it now.
-
No, the point being that they have no feasible way to process that many votes in the time frame in question. The quantity of votes far outstrips their ability to process them... That is a very good proof and a question that should be answered, albeit that it has been rendered moot.
Not so @roamer_1 See @Right_in_Virginia post just above.
-
Doesn't the legislature have the authority to over turn the certification, if there is evidence of fraud.
I would suppose, as I also suppose the board o elections could stop the general cert from occurring because of the known certification of a questionable precinct. None of which becomes more likely with that certification at the precinct and the county being accomplished.
-
Nope. The two R members have not signed the certification. They've requested a full audit.
@Right_in_Virginia
Well that is excellent news. Source plz?
-
Guys, relax. They certified with audit conditions attached.
-
Guys, relax. They certified with audit conditions attached.
In other words, No audit no certification!
-
Guys, relax. They certified with audit conditions attached.
That's what I thought... And now we're going to see kick the can, followed by hot potato, followed by... nothing.
-
Guys, relax. They certified with audit conditions attached.
Yep. Like saying I will gladly buy your car if you will sell it for $1.
-
That's what I thought... And now we're going to see kick the can, followed by hot potato, followed by... nothing.
Nope! In the absence of a full audit, the documents remain unsigned and there is no certification.
-
In other words, No audit no certification!
I hope you're right. But I doubt you are. The weight is off the originators. Now comes the razzle-dazzle, where that weight will fall on no one.
-
Guys, relax. They certified with audit conditions attached.
The two Rs on the committee have not signed the certification @Weird Tolkienish Figure
-
The way I understand/read it... they conditioned that certification with a required audit. Then and only then would they sign off on the certification.
Does anyone here know exactly which scenario is the correct one?
According to the President the two Republicans have not signed the certification papers @XenaLee He's tweeted twice this morning about this. They're waiting for a full audit.
-
Something like that... but it is literally kicking the can.
Actually, it's literally holding the line.
-
Actually, it's literally holding the line.
Like I said, I hope that's true.
-
@Right_in_Virginia
Well that is excellent news. Source plz?
See my previous post.
-
According to the President the two Republicans have not signed the certification papers @XenaLee He's tweeted twice this morning about this. They're waiting for a full audit.
Which is exactly how I understood the situation to be. And which also means that anyone trying to present this as an automatic defeat for Trump/win for Biden is being misleading, at best....
and is outright lying, at worst.
Thanks.
-
Guys, relax. They certified with audit conditions attached.
You forgot this: :sarc:
-
I think it ought to be obvious to all here by now:
After the failure of Republicans to stand up to what happened in Wayne County last night, there's not much chance of Mr. Trump reversing his fortune and winning.
I wish I didn't have to say that.
But I call 'em as I see 'em.
And that's what I see comin' down the pike.
-
I'd write 'em a check, pronto.
-
For $7.9 million, Trump could conduct his own recount.
-
Take it out of the war on terror budget.
-
I think it ought to be obvious to all here by now:
After the failure of Republicans to stand up to what happened in Wayne County last night, there's not much chance of Mr. Trump reversing his fortune and winning.
I wish I didn't have to say that.
But I call 'em as I see 'em.
And that's what I see comin' down the pike.
I'd like to know what more could have been done. All Republicans refused to certify last night. Maybe they should have taken the Rats out back and beaten them like they were Corn Pop.
-
I'd like to know what more could have been done. All Republicans refused to certify last night. Maybe they should have taken the Rats out back and beaten them like they were Corn Pop.
Works for me.
-
Take it out of the war on terror budget.
Take it out of the Subsidize DC budget.
-
Works for me.
That would make a fortune on Pay Per View.
-
The rules (stop laughing!) say that if the vote difference is outside of certain limits, the candidate can still request one if they pay for it even if they get charged an exorbitant rate.
-
SHell out the money and pick your own people to do the recount instead of the ones who stuffed the boxes. Let them watch.
-
Trump is paying $3 million for Dane and Milwaukee Counties. After the fact, Dems are now trying to change the rules for recounts.
https://wiseye.org/2020/11/18/wisconsin-elections-commission-special-teleconference-meeting-13/
-
That would make a fortune on Pay Per View.
Enough to pay for a real recount/audit.
-
American Military News by Liz George November 18, 2020
President Donald Trump’s campaign filed a recount petition with the Wisconsin Elections Commission in two counties Wednesday, alleging illegally changed absentee ballots, illegally issued absentee ballots, and illegal advice from government officials that allowed Voter ID laws to be avoided.
According to a press release (https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-files-a-petition-for-recount-in-two-wisconsin-counties/) from Trump’s re-election campaign, Milwaukee and Dane counties were chosen because “they are the locations with the worst irregularities.†The estimated cost of the recount is around $3 million, and the Trump campaign said it transferred that amount to the state.
The release alleged that the Wisconsin Elections Commission told Wisconsin municipal clerks to modify incomplete absentee ballots, directly contradicting Wisconsin law.
“Clerks were instructed that they could rely on their own ‘personal knowledge,’ or unspecified ‘lists or databases at his or her disposal’ to add in missing information on returned absentee ballots,†the release stated. “Under Wisconsin law, incomplete absentee ballots may not be counted.â€
Trump’s campaign went on to claim clerks across the state of Wisconsin distributed absentee ballots to voters without an application, violating absentee voting safeguards.
More: https://americanmilitarynews.com/2020/11/trump-campaign-files-for-recount-in-2-wisconsin-counties-foots-3m-bill/ (https://americanmilitarynews.com/2020/11/trump-campaign-files-for-recount-in-2-wisconsin-counties-foots-3m-bill/)
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnHmqRDWEA4RE4G?format=jpg&name=small)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnHmqREXYAUJSnN?format=jpg&name=small)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnHmqUeXEAMGyR2?format=jpg&name=small)
-
bkmk
-
BREAKING: WI Elections Commission, after seeing President Trump’s recount petition and objections, is trying to change the recount manual at an emergency meeting tonight at 6 pm to make objections harder to make. This must be stopped.— Andrew Hitt (@AndrewHittGOP) November 18, 2020
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Look at this in Wisconsin! A day AFTER the election, Biden receives a dump of 143,379 votes at 3:42AM, when they learned he was losing badly. This is unbelievable!
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnJi0ynWEAwbBxs?format=jpg&name=small)
8:22 PM · Nov 18, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1329233502139715586
-
Reince Priebus
@Reince
Let’s get this straight.
The Trump campaign sent the Wis Election Comm. $3 mill and filed its petition for a recount. Then the WEC immediately called a special meeting to change certain recount rules that deal with the issues brought up in the petition? You can’t make this up!
11:00 PM · Nov 18, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/Reince/status/1329273194377777153
-
Reince Priebus
@Reince
Let’s get this straight.
The Trump campaign sent the Wis Election Comm. $3 mill and filed its petition for a recount. Then the WEC immediately called a special meeting to change certain recount rules that deal with the issues brought up in the petition? You can’t make this up!
11:00 PM · Nov 18, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/Reince/status/1329273194377777153
And those expostfacto changes WILL be challenged I'm sure.
-
And those expostfacto changes WILL be challenged I'm sure.
I'm counting on it. happy77
-
Wisconsin
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnSddgfXcAAGTnm?format=jpg&name=900x900)
-
Trump campaign fails to toss thousands of ballots during Wisconsin recount
The Trump campaign has set the stage for possible litigation in Wisconsin after it unsuccessfully attempted to eliminate tens of thousands of ballots from being tallied.
As Wisconsin’s two-county recount began on Friday, Christ Troupis, an attorney for the president’s campaign, asked the Dane County Board of Canvassers to throw out ballots that it said should not be included in the election’s results. The three-member board, consisting of two Democrats and one Republican, decided unanimously against most of Troupis’s requests.
President Trump’s team opted to hold a recount only in Milwaukee and Dane counties, both of which voted overwhelmingly for President-elect Joe Biden. Troupis asked that the board not include early in-person votes, mail-in ballots in which the applications are not able to be found, and the ballots of voters who listed themselves as “indefinitely confined†to their residences and were thus exempted from providing photo identification.
The first two requests failed unanimously, while the last one failed 2-1, with the Republican board member voting in favor, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-campaign-fails-to-toss-thousands-of-ballots-during-wisconsin-recount (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-campaign-fails-to-toss-thousands-of-ballots-during-wisconsin-recount)
-
Democrats and RINOs gotta Democrat. Well, all the sooner for the lawsuits to hit the Federal Courts.
-
.
-
.
Good point!
-
Good point!
com
-
Wisconsin Officials Find Uncounted Ballots During Recount
Wisconsin Officials Find Uncounted Ballots During Recount
By Zachary Stieber
November 24, 2020 Updated: November 24, 2020
Print
Election officials in Wisconsin on Tuesday found a batch of uncounted ballots during the state’s partial recount.
Officials found 386 uncounted ballots.
Milwaukee’s elections board voted 3-0 to count the ballots, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported.
Claire Woodall-Vogg, Milwaukee’s chief election official, took the ballots to be opened and counted.
“It was a human error on Election Day. I reviewed the paperwork, and it was new election inspectors who worked one shift on Election Day, so I know they left in the middle of the day,†she told reporters at the Wisconsin Center in Milwaukee.
“But the way that we discovered the error, all of the unopened ballots were on the bottom, with all of the open certificate envelopes on top. And knowing how thorough we are at central count, I have no doubt that they brought these ballots up to the table, saying that they were complete, not indicating to anyone that half of the ward was missing. So if there’s one positive to come out of the recount, it’s that every vote is indeed being counted, including these 386.â€
more
https://www.theepochtimes.com/wisconsin-officials-find-uncounted-ballots-during-recount_3591698.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-11-24-2 (https://www.theepochtimes.com/wisconsin-officials-find-uncounted-ballots-during-recount_3591698.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-11-24-2)
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
“In Wisconsin, somebody has to be indefinitely confined in order to vote absentee. In the past there were 20,000 people. This past election there were 120,000...and Republicans were locked out of the vote counting process.†@VicToensing @newsmax
8:17 AM · Nov 24, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1331225404351373313
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
“In Wisconsin, somebody has to be indefinitely confined in order to vote absentee. In the past there were 20,000 people. This past election there were 120,000...and Republicans were locked out of the vote counting process.†@VicToensing @newsmax
8:17 AM · Nov 24, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1331225404351373313
For the sake of comity can you just move on? Let’s not argue and haggle over who stole which election from whom.
(Psst, that’s a nice downtown business district you got there. We wouldn’t want anything... unfortunate to happen to it, would we?)
*look*
-
Zoe Tillman
@ZoeTillman
New: Republicans in Wisconsin (the Trump campaign is not a party) filed an emergency petition in the state Supreme Court to stop the final certification of election results (HT @DemocracyDocket for the filing, screenshot of docket below)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Enna8-HWEAE0dTW?format=jpg&name=small)
3:36 PM · Nov 24, 2020·TweetDeck
(Full petition at link): https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/1331335974144651268
-
Group files emergency petition in Wisconsin after finding 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots (https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/group-files-emergency-petition-wisconsin-after-finding-potentially-150000)
"These discrepancies were a direct result of Wisconsin election officials’ willful violation of state law†– Amistad Project's Phil Kline
-
Group files emergency petition in Wisconsin after finding 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots (https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/group-files-emergency-petition-wisconsin-after-finding-potentially-150000)
"These discrepancies were a direct result of Wisconsin election officials’ willful violation of state law†– Amistad Project's Phil Kline
The national conservative group Amistad Project filed an emergency petition Tuesday with the Wisconsin Supreme Court challenging the state’s unofficial results in the 2020 presidential election, saying it has identified over 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots.
Results from the Nov. 3 balloting in the state show Democratic candidate Joe Biden defeated President Trump by a roughly 20,000-vote margin.
Phill Kline, director of the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, said the number of potentially fraudulent ballots identified are “more than enough to call into question the validity of the state’s reported election results.â€
“Moreover, these discrepancies were a direct result of Wisconsin election officials’ willful violation of state law,†he also said.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/group-files-emergency-petition-wisconsin-after-finding-potentially-150000
-
Trump Campaign Focusing on Unlawful Use of Absentee Ballot Process to Avoid Wisconsin ID Requirement
By Shipwreckedcrew | Nov 24, 2020 2:51 PM ET
The effort by the Trump Campaign to reverse the outcome of the election in Wisconsin is beginning to gain some attention — it now has my attention.
Reversing Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are necessary to call into question what will happen in the Electoral College on December 14.
As explained in this piece yesterday, in Georgia the focus is on invalid voter registrations which used a mail-drop or business location as a “residence†address on the voter and mail-in ballot application.
Pennsylania is a mish-mash of various claims, most of which are traceable back to partisan decisions of the state’s Supreme Court, which makes them all reachable in an omnibus review by the US Supreme Court.
But the approach in Wisconsin has been a bit of a mystery to me until now.
The margin of Biden’s “victory†in Wisconsin is only 43,000 votes out of 3.2 million cast. The reversal of Wisconsin from 2016 pretty much comes down to the additional 45,000 votes Biden received in Dane County compared to what Hillary Clinton received in 2016. That increase of 43,000 votes — from 217,000 to 260,000 — was an increase of 20%. Where did they all come from?
more
https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/11/24/trump-campaign-focusing-on-unlawful-use-of-absentee-ballot-process-to-avoid-wisconsin-id-requirement-n284528
-
Some Milwaukee Neighborhoods Reported Unusually High Election Turnout
By Petr Svab
November 25, 2020 Updated: November 25, 2020
Some 13,000 fewer people voted in Milwaukee in the 2020 election, compared to 2016. But in several neighborhoods, the number of ballots cast dramatically increased.
In one city ward, more than 105 percent of the eligible voting population cast ballots, based on demographic data from 2010—the most recent the city makes available. Another four wards had turnout over 92 percent.
Wisconsin is one of the states where President Donald Trump is contesting the results, which show his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, ahead by some 20,000 votes in unofficial results.
Milwaukee, a city of nearly 600,000, is divided into more than 300 wards, each reporting election results for its residents.
Ward 235 recorded 1,768 votes of which 1,391 were for Biden and 339 for Trump. But the ward only had a voting-eligible population of 1,680, according to the Milwaukee city election commission demographic data, which matches the 2010 census results.
It’s possible the ward’s population has increased in recent years. It does sport several new apartment buildings and reports over 2,100 registered voters. But voter registrations don’t necessarily reflect how many people actually live there. Most commonly, many voters don’t cancel their registrations when they move.
more
https://www.theepochtimes.com/some-milwaukee-neighborhoods-reported-unusually-high-election-turnout_3590601.html?utm_source=morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2020-11-26 (https://www.theepochtimes.com/some-milwaukee-neighborhoods-reported-unusually-high-election-turnout_3590601.html?utm_source=morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2020-11-26)
-
Mythinformed @Milwaukee Recount
@MythinformedMKE
The ballot observers had to be 6’ away from the ballot counters with a plexiglass barrier in between them.
Yet, Joe Biden’s attorneys can hold a face to face meeting. Who can explain this?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/En2NCNjXYAEgIza?format=jpg&name=small) (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/En2NCNgWEAMadi0?format=jpg&name=360x360)
12:30 PM · Nov 27, 2020 from Milwaukee, WI·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/MythinformedMKE/status/1332376138090487810
-
The ballot observers had to be 6’ away from the ballot counters with a plexiglass barrier in between them.
Ex post facto - distance rules created AFTER the Trump campaign paid for a recount.
-
Ex post facto - distance rules created AFTER the Trump campaign paid for a recount.
Typical Leftists, moving the goalposts.
-
Typical Leftists, moving the goalposts.
Typical Leftists violating the Constitution.
-
Typical Leftists violating the Constitution.
Typical Leftists getting away with it.
-
Biden picks up small number of votes in Milwaukee County after Trump-requested recount
(CNN)President-elect Joe Biden saw a small net gain in votes as Milwaukee County, Wisconsin's largest, certified its presidential general election results Friday after a recount requested by the Trump campaign.
The results showed a net gain of 132 votes for Biden, with President Donald Trump receiving 134,482 votes and Biden receiving 317,527 after the recount, the Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers announced Friday night.
CNN election results
But more than 27,000 ballots that are part of the count are being segregated after two objections by the Trump campaign.
The campaign objected to more than 25,000 absentee ballots cast by individuals who self-identified as "indefinitely confined," which allowed them to vote absentee because of pandemic fears.
more
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/27/politics/milwaukee-county-certifies-election-result/index.html (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/27/politics/milwaukee-county-certifies-election-result/index.html)
-
The signature “MLW†was used on the the fake votes.
These initials were found on thousands of “votes†by “indefinitely confined†people.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-exclusive-thousands-fake-votes-found-wisconsin-recount-dane-county-photos-report-gop-observer/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-exclusive-thousands-fake-votes-found-wisconsin-recount-dane-county-photos-report-gop-observer/)
-
The signature “MLW†was used on the the fake votes.
These initials were found on thousands of “votes†by “indefinitely confined†people.
"MLW" is not a signature. That alone should have disqualified these ballots.
-
Milwaukee County Recount Adds 132 Votes to Biden-Harris
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/28/milwaukee-county-recount-adds-132-votes-biden-harris/ (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/28/milwaukee-county-recount-adds-132-votes-biden-harris/)
-
EXCLUSIVE: President Trump Is After the Individual or Individuals Who Voted Illegally in Wisconsin – As Gateway Pundit Exposed Earlier
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/exclusive-president-trump-individual-individuals-voted-illegally-wisconsin-gateway-pundit-exposed-earlier/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/exclusive-president-trump-individual-individuals-voted-illegally-wisconsin-gateway-pundit-exposed-earlier/)
-
Wisconsin formally declares Biden won election following recount
By Julia Manchester - 11/30/20 05:13 PM EST
Wisconsin on Monday formally declared President-elect Joe Biden the winner of the state's presidential contest following a partial recount.
Biden won the Badger State by roughly 20,700 votes, according to Elections Commission Chairwoman Ann Jacobs (D), with Gov. Tony Evers (D) releasing a statement saying he had certified the results.
“Today I carried out my duty to certify the November 3rd election, and as required by state and federal law, I've signed the Certificate of Ascertainment for the slate of electors for President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris,†Evers said. "I want to thank our clerks, election administrators, and poll workers across our state for working tirelessly to ensure we had a safe, fair, and efficient election."
The development comes hours after Arizona officials affirmed Biden as the victor in that state as well.
more
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/528034-wisconsin-formally-declares-biden-won-election-following-recount
-
TRUMP CAMPAIGN FILES LAWSUIT IN WISCONSIN TO RESTORE ELECTION INTEGRITY
Dec 1, 2020
President Donald J. Trump’s re-election campaign filed a lawsuit to the Wisconsin Supreme Court following the campaign's requested recount to uncover fraud and abuse that irrefutably altered the outcome of this election. Today's suit includes four cases with clear evidence of unlawfulness, such as illegally altering absentee ballot envelopes, counting ballots that had no required application, overlooking unlawful claims of indefinite confinement, and holding illegal voting events called Democracy in the Park. These unlawful actions affected no less than approximately 221,000 ballots out of over the three million ballots cast in Wisconsin.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission directed municipal clerks to illegally alter incomplete absentee ballot envelopes contrary to Wisconsin law. Clerks were instructed that they could rely on their own “personal knowledge,†or unspecified “lists or databases at his or her disposal†to add in missing information on returned absentee ballots. Under Wisconsin law, incomplete absentee ballots must be corrected by the voter, and only the voter or they may not be counted.
In another example, municipal clerks issued absentee ballots to voters without requiring the mandatory application, in direct conflict with Wisconsin’s absentee voting safeguards. Wisconsin law expressly requires that absentee ballots may not be issued without receiving a written application requesting the ballot. Despite clear statute, clerks in Madison and Milwaukee issued thousands of absentee ballots without collecting a written application during the two-week in-person absentee voting period that ran from October 20, 2020, through November 1, 2020.
Voter identification is an essential requirement in Wisconsin to ensure only eligible voters cast ballots. In Madison and Milwaukee, voters were fraudulently permitted by election officials to circumvent voter ID laws and claim an absentee voting status that is only to be used for voters who are indefinitely confined under the circumstances that they are physically ill, infirm, elderly, or disabled. More than 20,000 voters claimed that status and received and returned ballots without providing proper identification and without meeting the requirements for that status, and those ballots should not be counted in accordance with Wisconsin statute.
Finally, the city of Madison created unlawful polling locations at over 200 parks and city locations through their Democracy in the Park voting events. These voting events were held outside of the county’s approved polling locations and did not follow the state’s strict absentee voting requirements. Not only did they not follow the law, but Joe Biden’s campaign encouraged this unlawful voting, advertising these events as opportunities to vote and telling voters to bring their completed ballot to turn in or their incomplete ballot to have a so-called “poll worker†serve as a witness. Voters are not allowed to turn in their absentee ballots anywhere other than the designated polling locations, and any ballots illegally cast there should not be counted.
More: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-files-lawsuit-in-wisconsin-to-restore-election-integrity/ (https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-files-lawsuit-in-wisconsin-to-restore-election-integrity/)
-
Bob Spindell
@BobSpindell
To clarify, today the Wis Elec Com Chair will “make determination†of elect & recount - NOT A “CERTIFICATION†allowing party 5 days to file appeal of this Determination. After resolution of appeal only then can WEC Commissioners meet to certify election. Will keep you informed!
2:22 PM · Nov 30, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/BobSpindell/status/1333491712837234691
-
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
(Ballot transport) Video: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1333873500931690499
3:39 PM · Dec 1, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
-
Donald J. Trump Retweeted
Andrew Havranek
@Andrew_Havranek
The #Wisconsin Supreme Court has ordered @GovEvers to respond to President @realDonaldTrump / @TeamTrump's lawsuit filed this morning, claiming abuse of absentee voting and illegal activity that affected roughly 220,000 ballots.
https://spectrumnews1.com/wi/milwaukee/news/2020/12/01/trump-files-lawsuit-after-wisconsin-recount-confirms-biden-win
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoLnnITXEAEtmkw?format=jpg&name=900x900)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EoLnnITXEAEtmkw?format=jpg&name=900x900)
4:18 PM · Dec 1, 2020·TweetDeck
https://twitter.com/Andrew_Havranek/status/1333883106001039360
-
Wisconsin high court declines to hear Trump election lawsuit
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A split Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear President Donald Trump’s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state, saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts.
The legal defeat on a 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of losses for Trump’s post-election lawsuits. Judges in multiple battleground states have rejected his claims of fraud or irregularities. Dissenting conservative justices said the decision would forever “stain†the outcome of the election.
Trump asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots in the state’s two biggest Democratic counties, alleging irregularities in the way absentee ballots were administered. His lawsuit echoed claims that were earlier rejected by election officials in those counties during a recount that barely affected Biden’s winning margin of about 20,700 votes.
more
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-wisconsin-lawsuits-2917742813e06908608848410ff41b0c
-
Wisconsin high court declines to hear Trump election lawsuit
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A split Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear President Donald Trump’s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state, saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts.
The legal defeat on a 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of losses for Trump’s post-election lawsuits. Judges in multiple battleground states have rejected his claims of fraud or irregularities. Dissenting conservative justices said the decision would forever “stain†the outcome of the election.
Trump asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots in the state’s two biggest Democratic counties, alleging irregularities in the way absentee ballots were administered. His lawsuit echoed claims that were earlier rejected by election officials in those counties during a recount that barely affected Biden’s winning margin of about 20,700 votes.
more
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-wisconsin-lawsuits-2917742813e06908608848410ff41b0c
Paging Justice Barrett, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
-
Wisconsin judge dismisses Trump campaign’s challenge to state’s election results
The Trump campaign says it will appeal the ruling to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
By Daniel Payne Updated: December 11, 2020 - 12:02pm
A Wisconsin judge on Friday dismissed the Trump campaign’s legal challenge of state election results, upholding what the judge said was the correct certification of Joe Biden as the winner of the presidential race in Wisconsin.
“The certification of the results of the 2020 Wisconsin presidential election, after the Dane County and Milwaukee County recounts, is affirmed,†Reserve Judge Stephen Simanek said during the virtual hearing.
Simanek said there has been “no credible evidence of any misconduct or wide-scale fraud†in the race.
He said the case turned on whether the recent recounts in Dane and Milwaukee counties “occurred in compliance with the Wisconsin election laws.â€
Simanek said petitioners on behalf of Trump’s campaign had not demonstrated that those laws had been violated.
Trump’s legal team brought the case before Simanek after the state’s Supreme Court declined to hear the case before lower courts had ruled on it. The case can now be appealed to the high court.
Trump attorney Jim Troupis said following Simanek’s ruling that the state Supreme Court “is expecting to hear from us shortly.â€
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-trump-hearing-friday
All moot if the SC does what's right.
-
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
NEW: Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear @TeamTrump election integrity case in arguments at noon local time Saturday.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1337437525003087873/wSOggJid?format=jpg&name=small)
6:29 PM · Dec 11, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1337539993095577605
-
Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear arguments in Trump’s lawsuit seeking to overturn state’s election results
https://www.chicagotribune.com/election-2020/ct-trump-wisconsin-lawsuit-ruling-20201211-if7qllakvvhmfnxwbmyg4th3su-story.html (https://www.chicagotribune.com/election-2020/ct-trump-wisconsin-lawsuit-ruling-20201211-if7qllakvvhmfnxwbmyg4th3su-story.html)
-
Wisconsin Supreme Court Oral Argument
Live stream:
Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8NT9iBoytE#)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8NT9iBoytE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8NT9iBoytE)
-
Judges appear to be a wee bit hostile. :whistle:
-
Wisconsin judge, appointed by Trump, dismisses election lawsuit…
A federal judge in Wisconsin on Saturday dismissed a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against the state elections commission.
The judge in the case, Brett Ludwig, who was appointed by Trump to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, held a hearing where the president’s lawyers made their arguments to set aside the result of the state’s popular election.
“This is an extraordinary case,†wrote Ludwig in his decision Saturday.
“A sitting president who did not prevail in his bid for reelection has asked for federal court help in setting aside the popular vote based on disputed issues of election administration, issues he plainly could have raised before the vote occurred.â€
“This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits,†the judge wrote. In his reply brief, plaintiff ‘asks that the Rule of Law be followed’ …. It has been,†the judge continued.
more
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/wisconsin-judge-appointed-by-trump-dismisses-election-lawsuit/ (https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/wisconsin-judge-appointed-by-trump-dismisses-election-lawsuit/)
-
In his reply brief, plaintiff ‘asks that the Rule of Law be followed’ …. It has been,†the judge continued.
I didn't realize that ballot stuffing was legal in Wisconsin.
-
[quoteIn his reply brief, plaintiff ‘asks that the Rule of Law be followed’ …. It has been,†the judge continued.
I didn't realize that ballot stuffing was legal in Wisconsin.
If there IS no rule of law, then the case can be made that any act follows it.
The statement "...set aside the popular vote..." implies that the judge does not understand that there is no popular vote when those numbers are tainted by fraud. What the electorate would have chosen is unknown: there is nothing to set aside. The ruling is made on a flawed and prejudicial premise, namely that the tabulation of votes is accurate and true. With assertions of fraud, that is not a given.
-
From 2016 to 2020, Trump increased his net total over his Democrat opponent in 50 of Wisconsin's 72 counties.
-
Zeke Miller
@ZekeJMiller
·
1m
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Supreme Court rules against Trump’s attempt to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the state.
-
BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court says election officials were wrong; ballots may not be counted
The opinion, which was released this morning, says local elections officials were wrong to suggest that voters could claim the status of "indefinitely confined" based on COVID-19. The majority decision also held that if voters falsely claimed they were indefinitely confined "their ballots would not count."
UPDATE: In a separate challenge, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has tossed President Trump’s case.
MADISON — The Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Mark Jefferson and the Republican Party of Wisconsin.
The opinion, which was released this morning, says local election officials were wrong to suggest that voters could claim the status of “indefinitely confined†based on COVID-19. The majority decision also held that if voters falsely claimed they were indefinitely confined “their ballots would not count.â€
But the court noted that a determination must be make in every case before tossing a ballot.
In a separate suit, President Trump has sought seek to invalidate all votes cast under the special status. In a second ruling released today, the court said the President was in error to ask that all ballots cast under the special status be tossed.
Under Wisconsin law, a voter may receive a ballot by mail and bypass Wisconsin’s voter ID law, if the voter, by his own determination, concludes he “confined†based on age, physical illness, or infirmity. This fall, roughly 215,000 voters in Wisconsin said they were indefinitely confined, nearly a four-fold increase from the 2016 election.
The court said the government’s interpretation of Wisconsin’s indefinitely confined was erroneous. “A county clerk may not “declare†that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic,†the court said. The court further stated that, “…the presence of a communicable disease such as COVID-19, in and of itself, does not entitle all electors [voters] in Wisconsin to obtain an absentee ballot…â€
https://electionwiz.com/2020/12/14/breaking-wisconsin-supreme-court-says-election-officials-were-wrong-ballots-may-not-be-counted/amp/
-
BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court says election officials were wrong; ballots may not be counted
LOL!
(https://rjlipton.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/johnlundstablehorsecroppedblendimagespaid.png)
-
Wisconsin Supreme Court rules state erred by giving blanket exemption to voter ID rules during COVID
Ruling opens door to challenge potentially tens of thousands of ballots in state where difference between Biden, Trump is just about 20,000 votes.
Just the News, Dec 14, 2020
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Monday that state and local election officials erred when they gave blanket permission allowing voters to declare themselves homebound and skip voter ID requirements in the 2020 election, potentially opening the door for Republicans to challenge tens of thousand of ballots.
More: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-state-erred-giving-blanket-exemption-voter
-
Wisconsin Supreme Court rules state erred by giving blanket exemption to voter ID rules during COVID
Ruling opens door to challenge potentially tens of thousands of ballots in state where difference between Biden, Trump is just about 20,000 votes.
Just the News, Dec 14, 2020
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Monday that state and local election officials erred when they gave blanket permission allowing voters to declare themselves homebound and skip voter ID requirements in the 2020 election, potentially opening the door for Republicans to challenge tens of thousand of ballots.
More: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-state-erred-giving-blanket-exemption-voter
Nice to know all those gubmint employees are right on it.
The "useless eaters" at the public trough aren't all on welfare..
-
Wisconsin Supreme Court rules state erred by giving blanket exemption to voter ID rules during COVID
Ruling opens door to challenge potentially tens of thousands of ballots in state where difference between Biden, Trump is just about 20,000 votes.
Just the News, Dec 14, 2020
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Monday that state and local election officials erred when they gave blanket permission allowing voters to declare themselves homebound and skip voter ID requirements in the 2020 election, potentially opening the door for Republicans to challenge tens of thousand of ballots.
More: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-state-erred-giving-blanket-exemption-voter
See now this is something... is there enough time?
-
See now this is something... is there enough time?
LOL! Nope, that's why we're finding about it now.
-
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
And what, exactly, is the substantive response to this testimony?
ForAmerica
@ForAmerica
"Three million people properly voted in the state of Wisconsin. More than 200,000 identified during this recount did not. But those votes got counted. Our statute says they should not have been. That in our view is a taint on our election in Wisconsin." -- Attorney James Troupis
Video: https://twitter.com/ForAmerica/status/1339237075678343171
12:05 PM · Dec 16, 2020·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1339255442694868992
Paging Ron Johnson, please pick up the white courtesy phone. Your objection is needed on Jan 6.
-
Second Biden Elector in Wisconsin Falsely Claimed Indefinite Confinement
Dan O'Donnell | Dec 16, 2020
A second presidential elector who cast one of Wisconsin's ten electoral votes for Joe Biden in Madison this week falsely claimed to be indefinitely confined to her home and likely committed election fraud, "The Dan O'Donnell Show" has discovered.
A Wisconsin Elections Commission list of indefinitely confined voters shows that Shelia Stubbs, a Democratic State Representative in Madison, claimed indefinite confinement even though she has actively campaigned for re-election this fall and has been active in her family's church.
(https://i.iheart.com/v3/re/new_assets/5fda1b1c9dfdf662e3b8cfea)
https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2020-12-16-second-biden-elector-in-wisconsin-falsely-claimed-indefinite-confinement/
This is the second Biden elector from Wisconsin who is in willful violation of Wisconsin's 'indefinite confinement' statute.
-
This is the second Biden elector from Wisconsin found so far who is in willful violation of Wisconsin's 'indefinite confinement' statute.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EqcVu8CVQAEqIIM?format=jpg&name=medium)
-
https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1393549478829957120
-
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1393648015521591296
-
https://rumble.com/embed/vhgz89/?pub=4
-
Report: Wisconsin Lost Track of 82,000 Ballots in State Biden Won by 20,000
Fred Lucas / @FredLucasWH / August 27, 2021
Wisconsin lost track of more than 82,000 mail-in ballots cast in the state in the November 2020 elections—more than four times the margin of difference separating the two presidential candidates in the state, according to a report by the nonprofit Public Interest Legal Foundation.
The legal foundation, an election integrity watchdog group, released a research brief Friday looking at one of the most closely contested states in the 2020 presidential election.
However, the Wisconsin Elections Commission disputes those findings, as the commission spokesman said the report “mischaracterizes election systems and cherry-picks data,” adding, it is “unreliable and frankly, it’s sloppy work.”
Joe Biden defeated then-President Donald Trump by 20,682 votes in Wisconsin in the November presidential election. However, according to the legal foundation’s report, 82,766 mail-in ballots in the state were either undeliverable or suffered an unknown fate.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/08/27/report-wisconsin-lost-track-of-82000-ballots-in-state-biden-won-by-20000/
-
However, the Wisconsin Elections Commission disputes those findings, as the commission spokesman said the report “mischaracterizes election systems and cherry-picks data,” adding, it is “unreliable and frankly, it’s sloppy work.”
So is having 82,000+ ballots unaccounted for...
-
Wisconsin Group Finds 23,000 State Voters With The Same Phone Number (https://www.lifezette.com/2021/09/wisconsin-group-finds-23000-state-voters-with-the-same-phone-number/)
Although the Democrats continue to control Washington and the White House, they forget that major 2020 election audits are still taking place all over the country. While people might have believed that Joe Biden became the most voted for president in all of history on election night, seeing him in action has left many wondering if former president Donald Trump was right – yet again. With just a couple of days, until some audits are revealed, a group in Wisconsin called the Wisconsin HOT (Honest Open and Transparent) is asking election officials why 23,000 of the state’s voters share the same phone number?...
-
Wisconsin Group Finds 23,000 State Voters With The Same Phone Number (https://www.lifezette.com/2021/09/wisconsin-group-finds-23000-state-voters-with-the-same-phone-number/)
Although the Democrats continue to control Washington and the White House, they forget that major 2020 election audits are still taking place all over the country. While people might have believed that Joe Biden became the most voted for president in all of history on election night, seeing him in action has left many wondering if former president Donald Trump was right – yet again. With just a couple of days, until some audits are revealed, a group in Wisconsin called the Wisconsin HOT (Honest Open and Transparent) is asking election officials why 23,000 of the state’s voters share the same phone number?...
And we still even have Briefers who don't think this thing was stolen. These stories are littered all over the 6 states that Biden cheated. I also think they had their sites on NC, but came up a bit short.
-
Wisconsin Group Finds 23,000 State Voters With The Same Phone Number (https://www.lifezette.com/2021/09/wisconsin-group-finds-23000-state-voters-with-the-same-phone-number/)
Although the Democrats continue to control Washington and the White House, they forget that major 2020 election audits are still taking place all over the country. While people might have believed that Joe Biden became the most voted for president in all of history on election night, seeing him in action has left many wondering if former president Donald Trump was right – yet again. With just a couple of days, until some audits are revealed, a group in Wisconsin called the Wisconsin HOT (Honest Open and Transparent) is asking election officials why 23,000 of the state’s voters share the same phone number?...
My head is about to expode, @Bigun .......
-
My head is about to expode, @Bigun .......
And the odds of getting this story off page 12 is about 1 in a 1000000000.
-
My head is about to expode, @Bigun .......
I hope you don't think you are alone @Right_in_Virginia it was obvious to me what was going on LONG ago and now we are seeing the proof.
-
I hope you don't think you are alone @Right_in_Virginia it was obvious to me what was going on LONG ago and now we are seeing the proof.
Well, those who will look at the proof are seeing it.
I continue to be amazed at those who think the election was conducted fairly and above board.
-
Well, those who will look at the proof are seeing it.
I continue to be amazed at those who think the election was conducted fairly and above board.
Amen!! People need to get their heads out of the sand and face reality!!!
-
My head is about to expode, @Bigun .......
Please capture video if it does. I think we could sell tickets.
-
Well, those who will look at the proof are seeing it.
I continue to be amazed at those who think the election was conducted fairly and above board.
It's not a matter of believing the election had massive fraud, it's a matter of: what the hell can we do about it? The Dems have been cheating for decades.
-
It's not a matter of believing the election had massive fraud, it's a matter of: what the hell can we do about it? The Dems have been cheating for decades.
Indeed. But until enough people realize it and quit making excuses for accepting that outcome, it will continue.
At the rate things are going we'd better figure out how to stop it soon, while there still is a country.
Short of crying foul at the precinct level on livestream and turning out large, immediate rowdy protest crowds, I don't know.
(In my best John Wayne/Zombie apocalypse survivor voice) "If ya kill 'em, they'll just keep voting! "
////00000////
-
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1453793903065411594
-
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1453793300939481097
-
Wisconsin Group Finds 23,000 State Voters With The Same Phone Number (https://www.lifezette.com/2021/09/wisconsin-group-finds-23000-state-voters-with-the-same-phone-number/)
@Bigun
Causen dey all be libbing in de same BIG-ass house,dummy!
-
Wisconsin Sheriff's Investigation: Election Laws Not Just Broken But 'Shattered' During 2020 Election
By Nick Arama | Oct 28, 2021 7:00 PM ET
Racine County Sheriff Christopher Schmaling announced today the results of an investigation into election law problems in Racine County and Wisconsin.
“Election statute was in fact not just broken, but shattered by members of the Wisconsin Elections Commission,” Schmaling said.
Schmaling and Sgt. Michael Luell, who led the investigation, said that they determined that eight people were living at the Ridgewood Care Center who had diminished capacity and who couldn’t even recognize family members at the Ridgewood Care Center had nonetheless voted by mail-in ballots. The investigation began on the complaint of one woman who said her mother voted despite not even being able to recognize her and beginning to hallucinate.
Schmaling said that they might forward recommendations to the local DA but that they actually wanted a statewide investigation because they believed the problem was greater than in the one home but Luell’s investigation so far had only pertained to the one home.
more
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2021/10/28/wisconsin-sheriffs-investigation-election-laws-not-just-broken-but-shattered-during-2020-election-n465329
-
@Bigun
Causen dey all be libbing in de same BIG-ass house,dummy!
It's the only payphone in town....
-
https://mobile.twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1475542595673763848
-
https://mobile.twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1475542595673763848
Only if you believe the vote count.
I don't.
-
Judge Gableman Issues Subpoenas to Voting Machine Companies Including Dominion Voting Machines in Wisconsin 2020 Election Investigation
Gateway Pundit 1/17/2022
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/breaking-big-judge-gableman-issues-subpoenas-voting-machine-companies-including-dominion-voting-machines-wisconsin-2020-election-investigation/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/breaking-big-judge-gableman-issues-subpoenas-voting-machine-companies-including-dominion-voting-machines-wisconsin-2020-election-investigation/)
Now this…
Judge Gableman subpoenaed to two voting companies in his continued investigation of the 2020 presidential election.
Gableman subpoenaed Dominion Voting Systems and Electronic Systems & Software (ES&S) of Nebraska.
We have written about both of these companies extensively at The Gateway Pundit.
Former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman in December issued orders to Colorado-based Dominion Voting Systems and Electronic Systems & Software of Nebraska seeking records related to the location of the companies’ voting machines in Wisconsin during the primary and general elections in 2020.
Gableman also seeks information about staff members who worked on Wisconsin machines or communicated with anyone in Wisconsin during that period.
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLVp333VcAEt8Em?format=jpg&name=small)
-
NO MORE FRAUD BOXES – Big Ruling By Wisconsin Supreme Court
https://trendingpolitics.com/no-fraud-boxes-big-ruling-by-wisconsin-supreme-court-ethom/
-
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
ICYMI: Over 115K active Wisconsin ghost voters over 100 years old. Thousands more w/ no traceable ID. Zuckerberg partisans INSIDE the Wisconsin state election system with real-time, read-write access able to add, vote & delete ghost voters at will. What a total fraudulent mess.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FMzJ_MXXEAAMY6D?format=jpg&name=small)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FMzKC39XsAQdk-3?format=jpg&name=360x360)
6:00 PM · Mar 1, 2022 Twitter Web App
-
Marina Medvin
@MarinaMedvin
"Rampant fraud and abuse occurred statewide at Wisconsin’s nursing homes and other residential care facilities” — Wisconsin Special Counsel
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FM7l7L4XIAYiSS_?format=jpg&name=small)
9:18 AM · Mar 3, 2022 Twitter Web App
-
Did You Know Green Bay's Election Was Run by Michael Spitzer Rubenstein From A Hotel Room?
There are so many newsworthy details contained in the just-released Wisconsin Special Counsel Report on the 2020 Election that it’s hard to know where to begin. Every American citizen should read this report because it explains how the election was stolen by Democrats. That alone makes it worthwhile.
Let’s start with this story:
The OSC learned that all machines in Green Bay were ESS machines and were
connected to a secret, hidden Wi-Fi access point at the Grand Hyatt hotel, which was the location used by the City of Green Bay on the day of the 2020 Presidential election. The OSC discovered the Wi-Fi, machines, and ballots were controlled by a single individual who was not a government employee but an agent of a special interest group operating in Wisconsin.
Wow. So one guy hidden at the Grand Hyatt Hotel controlled Green Bay’s election from his room? What is that guy’s name? According to the report: his name is Michael Spitzer Rubenstein. Why was a lawyer from Brooklyn in control of an election in Wisconsin?
That’s a good question. Let’s begin, though, with an explanation of why it’s been so hard to get any good questions answered at all. Just take a look at your calendar: it’s March 2022. The retired Wisconsin Supreme Court judge who conducted this Special Counsel investigation would remind all of us, first, that we’re talking about companies that are hiding their tracks.
https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/did-you-know-green-bays-election?s=r
-
Wow. In a just world, people would be wearing orange coveralls and shackles over this.
-
Wow. In a just world, people would be wearing orange coveralls and shackles over this.
:yowsa: pointing-up
-
Wow. In a just world, people would be wearing orange coveralls and shackles over this.
There is still the lake of fire awaiting in the other world....
-
So we now have three States - Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin, where it has been proven that enough fraudulent votes were submitted to sway the election from Trump to Biden. Those three states alone would put the electoral vote at 269-269. And there's still Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Nevada.
-
There is still the lake of fire awaiting in the other world....
Roger that.
I'm glad to be washed in the Blood of The Lamb...
-
:police:
Wow. In a just world, people would be wearing orange coveralls and shackles over this.
In a just world this would be an act of treason and after the firing squad people would be wearing caskets. That's my opinion, and I hold it for anyone that commits treason against the Republic.
-
BREAKING BIG: Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Public Absentee Drop Boxes ILLEGAL! (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-big-wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-absentee-drop-boxes-illegal/)
Bad news for Democrats!
-
https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1545433798917197825
-
BREAKING BIG: Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Public Absentee Drop Boxes ILLEGAL! (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-big-wisconsin-supreme-court-rules-absentee-drop-boxes-illegal/)
Bad news for Democrats!
Looks like they'll be switching to Private Absentee Drop Boxes.
-
Wisconsin Supreme Court: Ballot Drop Boxes Violate State Law
Jacob Bliss 8 Jul 2022
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 on Friday that absentee ballot drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law, vindicating a legal argument advanced by the Trump campaign in 2020 — though the ruling will govern elections in 2022 and the future, and cannot change previous election results.
Justice Rebecca Bradley began for the court majority in the new case:
This case concerns two documents created by employees of the Wisconsin Elections Commission (“WEC”). These documents authorize municipal clerks and local election officials to establish ballot drop boxes. According to one of the documents:
A drop box is a secure, locked structure operated by local election officials. Voters may deposit their ballot in a drop box at any time after they receive it in the mail up to the time of the last ballot collection Election Day. Ballot drop boxes can be staffed or unstaffed, temporary or permanent.
The other document adds, “a family member or another person may … return the ballot on behalf of the voter,” i.e., an agent of the voter may place the voter’s absentee ballot in a drop box.
more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/08/wisconsin-supreme-court-ballot-drop-boxes-violate-state-law/
-
(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/liz-2.jpg)
-
Kimberly Zapata ballot fraud case; guilty as charged on all counts
Christina Van Zelst | March 20, 2024 | 5:20pm CDT
MILWAUKEE - A Milwaukee County jury has reached a verdict in the trial of Kimberly Zapata – and found Zapata guilty on all counts against her.
The jury started deliberations around 10:30 a.m. Wednesday – and the verdict was read just before 4 p.m.
Zapata is the fired Milwaukee Election Commission deputy director accused of illegally requesting military ballots and sending them to the home of State Rep. Janel Brandtjen (R-Menomonee Falls).
The prosecutor in this case said Zapata used her position to commit fraud – while her defense attorney said she just wanted to expose loopholes in the election system.
"She was a whistleblower. She was showing with the truth, with an action, an imperfect action but a truthful action of what was going on," said Dan Adams, defense attorney.
"She brought to light the situation by lying on these applications. By having these fraudulent ballots issued. That’s not blowing the whistle on the problem, it’s aggravating the problem," said Matthew Westphal, assistant district attorney. . . .
https://www.fox6now.com/news/kimberly-zapata-ballot-fraud-case-guilty-all-counts
This is the same Kimberly Zapata who in 2020 gained notoriety for 'discovering' a flash drive with 120k Biden votes on it in the early morning following the 2020 election:
https://twitter.com/pepesgrandma/status/1770825330388820070
-
The Zapata thumb drive:
(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Wisconsin-Data-Pic-Showing-Dump.jpg)
-
Well there is ten electoral votes that went the wrong way, but that ten is ten less for Biden, and ten more for Trump, which makes a difference between the two totals of twenty.
-
Wow....
That means there is enough proof that Arizona (11 EV's) Georgia (16 EV's), and WI (10 EV's) were all stolen.
If you add those 37 to Trump's EV Total?
Trump- 269 EV
Biden- 269 EV
And consiering there was enough monkey business in Philly? I hope there isn't anyone else here at TBR, who thinks that this wasn't outright stolen.
-
Wow....
That means there is enough proof that Arizona (11 EV's) Georgia (16 EV's), and WI (10 EV's) were all stolen.
If you add those 37 to Trump's EV Total?
Trump- 269 EV
Biden- 269 EV
And consiering there was enough monkey business in Philly? I hope there isn't anyone else here at TBR, who thinks that this wasn't outright stolen.
I think it has been evident to those who simply examined the jumps in Biden's vote counts that there has been a crime committed. What you know, and what you can prove often are different things. It is just now that the proof is emerging.
As Chaucer said, "Murder will out!", and this unprecedented crime is no different.
Consider,too, that this administration has had the assistance and material support of intelligence chiefs*, past and present, people who cut their eye teeth rigging elections elsewhere, and the mechanisms start to come into focus.
*The Hunter Laptop 'hoax' hoax. Q.E.D.
-
"She brought to light the situation by lying on these applications. By having these fraudulent ballots issued. That’s not blowing the whistle on the problem, it’s aggravating the problem," said Matthew Westphal, assistant district attorney.
And cut past all that chest beating boilerplate, that is an admission that there is a problem which is not being dealt with.
-
I think it has been evident to those who simply examined the jumps in Biden's vote counts that there has been a crime committed. What you know, and what you can prove often are different things. It is just now that the proof is emerging.
As Chaucer said, "Murder will out!", and this unprecedented crime is no different.
Consider,too, that this administration has had the assistance and material support of intelligence chiefs*, past and present, people who cut their eye teeth rigging elections elsewhere, and the mechanisms start to come into focus.
*The Hunter Laptop 'hoax' hoax. Q.E.D.
:yowsa: pointing-up