The Briefing Room
General Category => National/Breaking News => Topic started by: mystery-ak on November 17, 2017, 02:35:07 am
-
Clinton ally Gillibrand says Bill should’ve resigned over Lewinsky affair
By David K. Li
November 16, 2017 | 8:46pm
New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a long-time political ally of Bill and Hillary Clinton, said Thursday the former president should have resigned after his affair with intern Monica Lewinsky was disclosed, according to a report.
Asked if the 42nd president needed to step down nearly 20 years ago, Gillibrand told the New York Times: “Yes, I think that is the appropriate response.”
The comments by Gillibrand, who holds the senate seat vacated by Hillary, make her the highest profile elected Democrat to make such a statement about the former President.
more
https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/clinton-ally-gillibrand-says-bill-shouldve-resigned-over-lewinsky-affair/
-
The words are just for throwaway, now.
-
No way in hell that was going to happen. They had to keep Hillary’s ambitions on track and they weren’t going to hand Gore the Oval Office.
-
Looks like a sneak attack on Trump. Bill Clinton has nothing to lose and this establishes that presidents can resign or be removed from office.
-
Of course he should have resigned.
Anyone with an ounce of honor would have.
But keep in mind that leftist women who claimed to be 'feminists' and 'liberated' back then, would have done anything to have Bill Clinton molest them.
This means nothing now. Nothing at all.
-
Looks like a sneak attack on Trump. Bill Clinton has nothing to lose and this establishes that presidents can resign or be removed from office.
Oh, if you think this will stop with Moore, you've another think coming... Now that everybody had hauled on their holier-than-thou clothes (on the record), and now that the libs have been 'cleaning their own house', it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see wha's next.
-
Of course he should have resigned.
Anyone with an ounce of honor would have.
But keep in mind that leftist women who claimed to be 'feminists' and 'liberated' back then, would have done anything to have Bill Clinton molest them.
This means nothing now. Nothing at all.
Then we would have had "President Gore". The guy who with Maurice Strong and George Soros stood to make trillions on the Chicago Carbon Exchange (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/09/collapse-chicago-climate-exchange-means-strategy-shift-global-warming-curbs.html), as soon as the cap and trade law passed. https://www.redstate.com/diary/barrypopik/2010/05/01/chicago-climate-exchange-is-sold-cap-trade-scam-of-the-century-continued/ (https://www.redstate.com/diary/barrypopik/2010/05/01/chicago-climate-exchange-is-sold-cap-trade-scam-of-the-century-continued/)
(We were scewed either way.)