Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
1
Solar power at midday is so useless, they plan to start charging homeowners for generating it
By Jo Nova

The glut in solar power in Australia is so big that next year solar panel owners in Sydney will have to pay 1.2c a kilowatt hour to offload their unwanted energy between 10am and 3pm. Nearly a million homes in Sydney have solar panels, but only 7% of them have batteries, which means basically, thousands of homes installed hi-tech generators that aren’t very useful. Worse, other homes were forced to pay part of the costs for them. The only winner was China.

Finally, a tiny part of the strangled free market is re-asserting itself, which might slow down future installations, or trick a few people into installing a $9,000 battery. Naturally this unpredictable rule change will hurt the poorest solar owners, but benefit those wealthy enough to afford a battery.

Solar panel owners slugged by Ausgrid for generating too much power
by Caitlin Fitzsimmons, Sydney Morning Herald

The biggest electricity distributor on the east coast plans to charge households with solar panels to export their electricity to the grid during the middle of the day.

Ausgrid will impose a penalty of 1.2¢ a kilowatt-hour for any electricity exported to the grid between 10am and 3pm above a free threshold that varies by month. During peak demand times, between 4pm and 9pm, Ausgrid would pay 2.3¢ an hour as a reward to customers exporting solar to the grid.

The tariff will be charged by Ausgrid and the retailer will decide how to package it. It is opt-in from July this year, and mandatory from July next year.

https://joannenova.com.au/2024/05/solar-power-at-midday-is-so-useless-they-plan-to-start-charging-homeowners-for-generating-it/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=solar-power-at-midday-is-so-useless-they-plan-to-start-charging-homeowners-for-generating-it
2
Demonized as contributing to climate change, cattle may actually decrease emissions, research shows

The researchers found that 19%-30% of methane emissions were from the cattle, but the rest was from the wetland soils. If the cows are removed, their research shows, it actually increases the amount of methane the wetland ecosystems give off.
 
By Kevin Killough
Published: May 13, 2024 11:00pm

Updated: May 14, 2024 8:49am
 
Few things have escaped environmentalists' scorn, and even cows have not been exempt from blame for climate change. Emissions from livestock production have become an increasing focus of efforts to fight climate change. The United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that 11.1% of emissions worldwide come from livestock production, and the organization released a report last year urging Americans to eat less meat. If people aren’t eating meat, the argument goes, then fewer cows are produced. If there’s fewer cows, there’s less emissions.

However, research by pro-agribuisness outfits Alltech and Archbold suggests that the thinking on reducing emissions at the source is missing a bigger picture on cattles’ relationship with the land, and possibly, by removing grazing from pastures, emissions will actually go up.

Complex process

Besides trying to convince people to change their diets so we can get rid of more cows, other efforts seek to attack the emissions at the source. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation awarded a $4.8 million grant to a London-based company to develop a gas mask as a sort of carbon capture technology — on a cow. Other research is looking into food additives that go into the cows’ feed as a way to reduce the amount of emissions coming out of the animal.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/environment/demonized-contributing-climate-change-cattle-may-decrease-emissions
3
Biden To Ruin Thousands Of Miles Of Land For Green Energy Schemes
by James Taylor  25 mins ago 
 

The Biden administration has announced plans to despoil thousands of miles of land throughout the United States with new corridors for wind and solar transmission lines. [emphasis, links added]

In addition to stretching across thousands of miles of land in length, the Department of Energy reports the transmission-line projects may be up to 100 miles wide.


The transmission lines, necessary to deliver wind and solar power from rural wind and solar projects to distant population centers, will destroy an enormous amount of open spaces and wildlife habitats.

The Energy Department is tapping into $4.5 billion to make the project happen.
 
https://climatechangedispatch.com/biden-to-ruin-thousands-of-miles-of-land-for-green-energy-schemes/
4
‘Hydrogen town’ plan cancelled after protests over forced switch from natural gas
MAY 12, 2024
 
By Paul Homewood
 

The Net Zero disaster lurches from one crisis to another:
 

The Energy Secretary has scrapped plans for a pilot “hydrogen town” after a wave of protests against earlier trials.

Claire Coutinho has shelved proposals to force thousands of homes and businesses to replace their natural gas supplies with hydrogen by 2030 to test the fuel’s viability.

Aberdeen, Scunthorpe, and two Welsh towns were among those being considered for wholesale conversion to hydrogen for heating.

It was meant to be a trial run to test the use of low-carbon hydrogen as a replacement for natural gas, which was being considered as part of the UK’s drive to reach net zero by 2050.

However, ministers have been forced into a rethink following a wave of protests in two smaller communities – Redcar in Yorkshire and Whitby, near Ellesmere Port – that had been earmarked as testbed “hydrogen villages”. Both proposed trials were ultimately abandoned.

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2024/05/12/hydrogen-town-plan-cancelled-after-protests-over-forced-switch-from-natural-gas/
5
It's all part of the crisis Trump created by programs that protected America, and Americans, from such an invasion.  If his administration had been as ineffective as Biden's more people would have snuck in earlier and it wouldn't be as big a problem as it is now. :whistle:
6
Trump Twirls the Windmills of Doom: The Guardian’s Theatrical Take
18 hours ago Charles Rotter 50 Comments


Ah, The Guardian, ever the beacon of balanced journalism, has outdone itself yet again. With a flourish of melodramatic despair, they’ve painted a portrait of Donald Trump as an eco-villain, brandishing policies like a black cape in a horror show of environmental doom. Let’s dive into their latest apocalyptic prophecy.

Donald Trump has vowed to immediately halt offshore wind energy projects “on day one” of a new term as US president, in his most explicit threat yet to the industry and the latest in a series of promises to undo key aspects of the transition to cleaner energy.

The drama unfolds with Trump, the presumed puppet master of planetary destruction, vowing to dismantle the beloved wind projects. Never mind that the industry might warrant a critical inspection of its impacts; The Guardian is more interested in framing this as an opening scene of a Shakespearean tragedy.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/05/15/trump-twirls-the-windmills-of-doom-the-guardians-theatrical-take/
7
Climate Change / Re: Drax To Build Wood Power Cargo Ship
« Last post by rangerrebew on Today at 10:39:11 am »
Are they naming it Titanic? :whistle:
8
Climate Change / Drax To Build Wood Power Cargo Ship
« Last post by rangerrebew on Today at 10:38:28 am »
Drax To Build Wood Power Cargo Ship
MAY 15, 2024
 
By Paul Homewood

 

British power company Drax has drawn up plans for the world’s first wood-powered cargo ship, claiming that the controversial power source can help to cut greenhouse gas emissions from sea freight.

Drax, which operates a tree-burning power station in the UK, has signed a deal with three Japanese shipping companies to develop a “bioship” fuelled by wood chips instead of marine diesel. It hopes to see the first wood-fuelled cargo ship set sail by 2029.

The vessel would itself be used to ferry woodchips harvested by Drax from North American forests to new markets in Japan.

Drax and its Japanese partners said such ships would open the way to zero-emission shipping for many other cargoes.

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2024/05/15/drax-to-build-wood-power-cargo-ship/
9
Michigan Government: Stacked Top to Bottom with Donor-provided Climate Activist “Staff”
2 hours ago Guest Blogger 1 Comment

From Government Accountability & Oversight

With Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filing the “climate” lawsuit that campaign supporter Michigan LCV had lobbied her to file against energy companies, and the UM law school faculty putting the shoulder to the wheel as well, GAO recalls the recently unearthed record of just how occupied Michigan’s government is with donor-financed “climate staff”.

First, recall Nessel’s embrace of taking in an activist lawyer provided by Michael Bloomberg to file this suit, just as Bloomberg-provided lawyers have filed numerous others for AGs from New York to Oregon:


And Michigan’s Public Service Commission asking for Bloomberg-provided “staff”, brokered by a renewable energy trade association “founded and funded” by Tom Steyer to push his agenda:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/05/16/michigan-government-stacked-top-to-bottom-with-donor-provided-climate-activist-staff/
10
Juanita Broderick?  She’s still around?  There’s a blast from the (Klintoon) past!
She's a Twitter stalwart - very popular in conservative circles.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10