Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10
1
MOL
14:19
Stormy Daniels is up for a fight

From Rob Crilly, Senior Political Reporter inside court:

The cross examination is riveting stuff.

Susan Necheles opened up by asking Stormy Daniels whether she had rehearsed for this moment with prosecution lawyers.

Daniels did not like that line of questioning and bristled.

She sat up straight, jutting her jaw to one side in defiant fashion, as she tried to hit the questions straight back at the questioner.

That set the tone for an increasingly bad tempered encounter as the defense tries to make out that she is a money-grabbing chancer.
2
Isn't that like saying "some people say Cruz's father killed Kennedy"? He's saying it but not saying it...

That's what the judge just did.

It's wrong period.

Which is what I've been shouting here for a LONG time!
3
Greta Van Susteren
@greta
·
1h
The judge thinks he can “fix” the outrageous prejudicial testimony elicited by the prosecutor from Story Daniels w/limiting instruction to the jury..ah..Juries can not UNHEAR what they just heard just because judge tells them to
4
What started out as a Kangaroo Court has turned into a farce of a 3-ring circus. 

The judical entities in NY have set back jurisprudence a 1000 years. 
5
LOL! You can't make this stuff up!

To my knowledge that case was only about the NDA being valid or not, not the contents of it or if she was telling the truth or not. It was simply confirmed to be a binding NDA.
6
That's a two way street. Didn't Trump try to destroy her over her trying to get out of the NDA "for her story"? Trump has a long trail of wreckage of people he's destroyed via lies. If she was telling the truth and Trump was calling her a liar, who holds the higher moral ground?

Now, I'm not suggesting that this farce of a trial involves any actual crime on Trump's part. It is setting a terrible legal precedence.

On that point I fully agree! Everyone involved with the prosecution of this should be disbarred with prejudice!
8
Excellent question! These NYC judges are a joke!

Isn't that like saying "some people say Cruz's father killed Kennedy"? He's saying it but not saying it...

That's what the judge just did.

It's wrong period.
9
Quote
When Necheles questions whether Trump won the case, Daniels counters 'he prevailed, I was not found to have lost.'

LOL! You can't make this stuff up!
10
I'm sick to DEATH of this "he said/she said crap being used in attempts to destroy people in the courts! Couldn't care less who the players are!

That's a two way street. Didn't Trump try to destroy her over her trying to get out of the NDA "for her story"? Trump has a long trail of wreckage of people he's destroyed via lies. If she was telling the truth and Trump was calling her a liar, who holds the higher moral ground?

Now, I'm not suggesting that this farce of a trial involves any actual crime on Trump's part. It is setting a terrible legal precedence.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 10