The Briefing Room
General Category => Editorial/Opinion/Blogs => Topic started by: 240B on November 20, 2017, 01:15:26 pm
-
Washington Examiner
by Becket Adams
Nov 18, 2017, 1:09 PM
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., built her political career on the backs of the Clintons.
But now that the former first family’s political fortunes have all but evaporated following the 2016 presidential election, the New York senator has jumped on a 20-years-too-late bandwagon that says it is time we get serious about Bill Clinton’s storied history of sexual misconduct.
Gillibrand was asked directly this week if Bill Clinton should’ve resigned from the White House when it was discovered he was engaged in an extramarital, extra-sleazy relationship with a 22-year-old intern named Monica Lewinsky. Remember, America’s 42nd president was 49-years-old at the time.
“Yes, I think that is the appropriate response,” the New York senator said during an interview this week for the New York Times’ podcast, “The New Washington.”
What a difference a year makes.
(more)
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sen-gillibrand-stabs-her-patrons-in-the-back/article/2641157
-
Just typical dem hypocrisy - does anyone seriously think she'd be saying this if Bill's odious remora had won? The Clintons are finally getting their richly-deserved and long overdue view of the underside of the bus...