The Briefing Room
State Chapters => Florida => Topic started by: RoosGirl on October 20, 2018, 07:24:37 pm
-
Prohibits Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling; Prohibits Vaping in Enclosed Indoor Workplaces
Prohibits drilling for the exploration or extraction of oil and natural gas beneath all state-owned waters between the mean high water line and the state's outermost territorial boundaries. Adds use of vapor-generating electronic devices to current prohibition of tobacco smoking in enclosed indoor workplaces with exceptions; permits more restrictive local vapor ordinances.
Yes
-or-
No
-
Just Say No to the Nanny State. It's all poison pills, this one.
-
It's already a State constitutional amendment not to allow smoking in restaurants. *****rollingeyes*****
-
No. Doesn't belong at the constitution level.
-
No. Doesn't belong at the constitution level.
I don't think the vaping thing should be applied by the state at all. There are two completely unrelated issues here. I notice several of the Amendments @RoosGirl posted contain unrelated issues. This is the sort of crap that makes me vote "No" on all props, regardless of their value.
-
I don't think the vaping thing should be applied by the state at all. There are two completely unrelated issues here. I notice several of the Amendments @RoosGirl posted contain unrelated issues. This is the sort of crap that makes me vote "No" on all props, regardless of their value.
Yep! The other thing I don't like is that the sample ballot does not give any information on further research of any of the amendments.... like actual wording of the amendments and not what some idiot at the supervisor of elections office wrote up for me.
-
Yep! The other thing I don't like is that the sample ballot does not give any information on further research of any of the amendments.... like actual wording of the amendments and not what some idiot at the supervisor of elections office wrote up for me.
We get a thick manual containing the props, with details and pro & con arguments. I like that. Dittos for candidates. I'd like to see more details about the Judge Retention votes. I usually don't vote on that, unless I have someone to vote against because he/she is a bleep.
-
I don't think the vaping thing should be applied by the state at all. There are two completely unrelated issues here. I notice several of the Amendments @RoosGirl posted contain unrelated issues. This is the sort of crap that makes me vote "No" on all props, regardless of their value.
I agree on both counts. However, if there is going to be a statewide ban on vaping (or smoking), it doesn't belong in the constitution.
Same thing with pot. I voted against legalization amendments at least twice. Not because I really care that much about pot one way or the other, I just don't think the word marijuana belongs in our constitution.