The Briefing Room
General Category => Editorial/Opinion/Blogs => Topic started by: 240B on June 08, 2017, 09:21:27 am
-
The Constitution
By Andrew West
June 6, 2017
There are some terrible ideas emanating from the left side of American politics in regard to how to effectively deal with radical Islamic terrorism.
The most infamous of these tactics was popularized by former U.S. President Barack Obama whose master plan for ISIS and their vile cronies was to ignore them. When the former democratic deity was forced to confront the Islamic terror threat, he did so by lamely insulting those who were waging war on all non-Muslims, calling them “desperate” and claiming that their attacks were indicative of an organization “on the run”.
Now, the once-apparent heir to the Obama throne, Hillary Clinton, has come forward with her own asinine theories on how best to combat jihadists, and they are no better than those of her former boss.
“The defeated presidential candidate told a fundraiser for a youth program that the best way to stop terrorism was to ‘understand’ other cultures and their food.
“Yes, really.
“Clinton said that Khan, who has called for Donald Trump to be banned from entering the UK for a state visit (while actual terrorists from Syria are free to return), had shown ‘steady, determined leadership’.
“Hillary said the best way of combating terror was to ‘reach out to the world’ in order to ‘understand’ people living in foreign countries.
“’Getting to know one another. Learning about the experiences, the lives, the cultures, the religions, the food,’ she added.”
This hands-off approach to terrorism has been thoroughly proven ineffective and dangerous over the course of the last 8 years, as vigilance around the globe waned in light of Obama’s shortsighted attitude toward the violence inherent in radical Islamic teachings.
(more)
http://constitution.com/hillary-believes-understanding-radical-islamic-food-will-stop-terrorism/